Suppr超能文献

较低的认知基线分数可预测健康老年人在 6 个月后的认知训练成功:一项在线 RCT 的结果。

Lower cognitive baseline scores predict cognitive training success after 6 months in healthy older adults: Results of an online RCT.

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, Neuropsychology and Gender Studies & Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Department of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;35(9):1000-1008. doi: 10.1002/gps.5322. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying predictors for general cognitive training (GCT) success in healthy older adults has many potential uses, including aiding intervention and improving individual dementia risk prediction, which are of high importance in health care. However, the factors that predict training improvements and the temporal course of predictors (eg, do the same prognostic factors predict training success after a short training period, such as 6 weeks, as well as after a longer training period, such as 6 months?) are largely unknown.

METHODS

Data (N = 4,184 healthy older individuals) from two arms (GCT vs. control) of a three-arm randomized controlled trial were reanalyzed to investigate predictors of GCT success in five cognitive tasks (grammatical reasoning, spatial working memory, digit vigilance, paired association learning, and verbal learning) at three time points (after 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months of training). Possible investigated predictors were sociodemographic variables, depressive symptoms, number of training sessions, cognitive baseline values, and all interaction terms (group*predictor).

RESULTS

Being female was predictive for improvement in grammatical reasoning at 6 weeks in the GCT group, and lower cognitive baseline scores were predictive for improvement in spatial working memory and verbal learning at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that predictors seem to change over time; remarkably, lower baseline performance at study entry is only a significant predictor at 6 months training. Possible reasons for these results are discussed in relation to the compensation hypothesis. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:-, 2020.

摘要

背景

确定健康老年人一般认知训练(GCT)成功的预测因素有很多潜在用途,包括辅助干预和改善个体痴呆风险预测,这在医疗保健中非常重要。然而,预测训练效果的因素以及预测因素的时间进程(例如,相同的预后因素是否在短期训练(如 6 周)后以及长期训练(如 6 个月)后预测训练成功?)在很大程度上是未知的。

方法

对三臂随机对照试验的两个组(GCT 与对照组)的数据(N = 4184 名健康老年人)进行重新分析,以研究在五个认知任务(语法推理、空间工作记忆、数字警戒、成对联想学习和言语学习)中的 GCT 成功的预测因素在三个时间点(6 周、3 个月和 6 个月训练后)。可能的预测因素包括社会人口统计学变量、抑郁症状、训练次数、认知基线值以及所有交互项(组*预测因素)。

结果

在 GCT 组中,女性在 6 周时语法推理的改善是预测因素,而较低的认知基线分数在 6 个月时是空间工作记忆和言语学习改善的预测因素。

结论

我们的数据表明,预测因素似乎随时间而变化;值得注意的是,在研究开始时较低的基线表现仅在 6 个月的训练时是显著的预测因素。这些结果的可能原因与补偿假说有关进行了讨论。美国老年医学会杂志 68:-,2020 年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验