Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Neuroscience and Physiological Sciences Graduate Interdisciplinary Programs, and BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona and Arizona Alzheimer's Disease Consortium, Tucson, AZ, USA; Brain Imaging, Behavior and Aging Laboratory, Department of Psychology and Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Brain Stimul. 2023 May-Jun;16(3):904-917. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.05.021. Epub 2023 May 26.
There is a need for effective interventions to stave off cognitive decline in older adults. Cognitive training has variably produced gains in untrained tasks and daily functioning. Combining cognitive training with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may augment cognitive training effects; however, this approach has yet to be tested on a large-scale.
This paper will present the primary findings of the Augmenting Cognitive Training in Older Adults (ACT) clinical trial. We hypothesize that receiving active stimulation with cognitive training will result in greater improvements on an untrained fluid cognition composite compared to sham following intervention.
379 older adults were randomized, and 334 were included in intent-to-treat analyses for a 12-week multidomain cognitive training and tDCS intervention. Active or sham tDCS was administered at F3/F4 during cognitive training daily for two weeks then weekly for 10 weeks. To assess the tDCS effect, we fitted regression models for changes in NIH Toolbox Fluid Cognition Composite scores immediately following intervention and one year from baseline controlling for covariates and baseline scores.
Across the entire sample, there were improvements in NIH Toolbox Fluid Cognition Composite scores immediately post-intervention and one year following baseline; however, there were no significant tDCS group effects at either timepoint.
The ACT study models rigorous, safe administration of a combined tDCS and cognitive training intervention in a large sample of older adults. Despite potential evidence of near-transfer effects, we failed to demonstrate an additive benefit of active stimulation. Future analyses will continue to assess the intervention's efficacy by examining additional measures of cognition, functioning, mood, and neural markers.
需要有效的干预措施来延缓老年人的认知能力下降。认知训练在未训练任务和日常功能方面都取得了不同程度的收益。将认知训练与经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)相结合可能会增强认知训练的效果;然而,这种方法尚未在大规模研究中进行测试。
本文将介绍 Augmenting Cognitive Training in Older Adults(ACT)临床试验的主要发现。我们假设,与假刺激相比,在干预后,接受主动刺激的认知训练在未训练的流体认知综合测试上会有更大的提高。
379 名老年人被随机分组,334 名老年人被纳入意向治疗分析,接受为期 12 周的多领域认知训练和 tDCS 干预。在认知训练期间,每天在 F3/F4 给予真刺激或假刺激,持续两周,然后每周 10 周。为了评估 tDCS 的效果,我们在干预后和基线后一年分别对 NIH 工具包流体认知综合评分的变化进行了回归模型拟合,同时控制了协变量和基线评分。
在整个样本中,NIH 工具包流体认知综合评分在干预后即刻和基线后一年都有所提高;然而,在这两个时间点,tDCS 组之间没有显著的差异。
ACT 研究模型在一个大样本的老年人中进行了严格、安全的联合 tDCS 和认知训练干预。尽管有近迁移效应的潜在证据,但我们未能证明主动刺激的附加益处。未来的分析将继续通过检查认知、功能、情绪和神经标记的其他测量来评估干预的效果。