Robinson Oliver, Chadeau Hyam Marc, Karaman Ibrahim, Climaco Pinto Rui, Ala-Korpela Mika, Handakas Evangelos, Fiorito Giovanni, Gao He, Heard Andy, Jarvelin Marjo-Riitta, Lewis Matthew, Pazoki Raha, Polidoro Silvia, Tzoulaki Ioanna, Wielscher Matthias, Elliott Paul, Vineis Paolo
MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Computational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu and Biocenter Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Aging Cell. 2020 Jun;19(6):e13149. doi: 10.1111/acel.13149. Epub 2020 May 3.
Markers of biological aging have potential utility in primary care and public health. We developed a model of age based on untargeted metabolic profiling across multiple platforms, including nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in urine and serum, within a large sample (N = 2,239) from the UK Airwave cohort. We validated a subset of model predictors in a Finnish cohort including repeat measurements from 2,144 individuals. We investigated the determinants of accelerated aging, including lifestyle and psychological risk factors for premature mortality. The metabolomic age model was well correlated with chronological age (mean r = .86 across independent test sets). Increased metabolomic age acceleration (mAA) was associated after false discovery rate (FDR) correction with overweight/obesity, diabetes, heavy alcohol use and depression. DNA methylation age acceleration measures were uncorrelated with mAA. Increased DNA methylation phenotypic age acceleration (N = 1,110) was associated after FDR correction with heavy alcohol use, hypertension and low income. In conclusion, metabolomics is a promising approach for the assessment of biological age and appears complementary to established epigenetic clocks.
生物衰老标志物在初级保健和公共卫生领域具有潜在用途。我们基于多平台的非靶向代谢谱分析开发了一种年龄模型,这些平台包括来自英国电波队列的大量样本(N = 2239)中的尿液和血清的核磁共振光谱法和液相色谱 - 质谱法。我们在一个芬兰队列中验证了模型预测因子的一个子集,该队列包括来自2144名个体的重复测量数据。我们研究了加速衰老的决定因素,包括过早死亡的生活方式和心理风险因素。代谢组学年龄模型与实际年龄高度相关(独立测试集的平均r = 0.86)。在错误发现率(FDR)校正后,代谢组学年龄加速(mAA)增加与超重/肥胖、糖尿病、大量饮酒和抑郁症相关。DNA甲基化年龄加速测量与mAA不相关。在FDR校正后,DNA甲基化表型年龄加速增加(N = 1110)与大量饮酒、高血压和低收入相关。总之,代谢组学是评估生物年龄的一种有前途的方法,并且似乎是对已建立的表观遗传时钟的补充。