• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国甲状腺协会超声风险和 Afirma 基因表达分类器单独及联合用于诊断 Bethesda Ⅲ类细胞学的甲状腺结节。

American Thyroid Association Sonographic Risk and Afirma Gene Expression Classifier Alone and in Combination for the Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules with Bethesda Category III Cytology.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA.

Division of Endocrinology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Thyroid. 2020 Nov;30(11):1613-1619. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0673. Epub 2020 May 26.

DOI:10.1089/thy.2019.0673
PMID:32364010
Abstract

The Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) has been used to aid in the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules having Bethesda category III fine-needle aspiration cytologic diagnosis (B3 nodules). The American Thyroid Association sonographic risk stratification system for thyroid nodules (ATA-US) may stratify B3 nodules and aid in the decision to order a molecular test. The aim of this study was to assess the association between ATA-US and GEC as well as to determine their individual and combined diagnostic performances when applied to B3 nodules. A retrospective single-center study included B3 nodules that had undergone evaluation by GEC. Each ultrasound was reviewed by three radiologists, and nodules were classified using the 2015 ATA sonographic risk categories. Nodules were determined to be benign or malignant based on surgical pathology or minimum 11 months of follow-up. Positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated for GEC, ATA-US, and GEC across all ATA-US categories. One hundred twenty-six B3 nodules with GEC results were included and deemed benign or malignant based on final pathology or follow-up. Prevalence of malignancy was 32%. The rate of malignancy was similar in the ATA-US high suspicion (HS) and intermediate suspicion (IS) categories at 42% and 38%, respectively; and lower in nodules with low suspicion sonography (LS) and very low suspicion sonography (VLS) at 23% and 11%, respectively. The PPV and NPV of ATA-US was calculated by designating HS or IS sonography as a "positive" test and the lower risk categories as "negative." ATA-US had a PPV of 40% and NPV of 79%. The GEC PPV was 40% and NPV was 83%. The PPV of GEC was 50% in nodules with HS or IS ATA-US and lower at 28% and 20%, respectively, in LS and VLS nodules. The NPV of GEC was 80% in HS, 77% in IS, 84% in LS, and 100% in VLS sonography categories. In B3 nodules, ATA-US and GEC have similar diagnostic performance. The PPV of GEC varies across ATA-US categories, while the NPV remains similar. These data support the need for future prospective studies.

摘要

Affirma 基因表达分类器(GEC)已被用于辅助诊断和管理具有 Bethesda 细针抽吸细胞学诊断类别 III(B3 结节)的甲状腺结节。美国甲状腺协会(ATA)的甲状腺结节超声风险分层系统(ATA-US)可对 B3 结节进行分层,并有助于决定是否进行分子检测。本研究旨在评估 ATA-US 和 GEC 之间的相关性,并确定当应用于 B3 结节时它们各自和联合的诊断性能。这是一项回顾性单中心研究,纳入了接受 GEC 评估的 B3 结节。每位放射科医生对每个超声进行了审查,并使用 2015 年 ATA 超声风险类别对结节进行了分类。根据手术病理或至少 11 个月的随访,确定结节为良性或恶性。计算了 GEC、ATA-US 以及在所有 ATA-US 类别中的 GEC 的阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。纳入了 126 个具有 GEC 结果的 B3 结节,并根据最终病理或随访确定为良性或恶性。恶性肿瘤的患病率为 32%。ATA-US 高度可疑(HS)和中间可疑(IS)类别的恶性肿瘤发生率分别为 42%和 38%,相似;而在超声低度可疑(LS)和极低度可疑(VLS)的结节中分别为 23%和 11%,较低。ATA-US 的 PPV 和 NPV 是通过将 HS 或 IS 超声指定为“阳性”试验和较低的风险类别指定为“阴性”试验来计算的。ATA-US 的 PPV 为 40%,NPV 为 79%。GEC 的 PPV 为 40%,NPV 为 83%。在 HS 或 IS ATA-US 结节中,GEC 的 PPV 为 50%,在 LS 和 VLS 结节中分别为 28%和 20%。GEC 的 NPV 在 HS 为 80%,IS 为 77%,LS 为 84%,VLS 为 100%。在 B3 结节中,ATA-US 和 GEC 的诊断性能相似。GEC 的 PPV 随 ATA-US 类别而变化,而 NPV 则保持相似。这些数据支持未来进行前瞻性研究的必要性。

相似文献

1
American Thyroid Association Sonographic Risk and Afirma Gene Expression Classifier Alone and in Combination for the Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules with Bethesda Category III Cytology.美国甲状腺协会超声风险和 Afirma 基因表达分类器单独及联合用于诊断 Bethesda Ⅲ类细胞学的甲状腺结节。
Thyroid. 2020 Nov;30(11):1613-1619. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0673. Epub 2020 May 26.
2
Molecular testing for indeterminate thyroid nodules: Performance of the Afirma gene expression classifier and ThyroSeq panel.甲状腺结节不明原因的分子检测:Afirma 基因表达分类器和 ThyroSeq 面板的性能。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 Jul;126(7):471-480. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21993. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
3
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Patterns by K-TIRADS and 2015 ATA Guidelines in Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules and Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance.超声 K-TIRADS 分类与 2015 年 ATA 指南在甲状腺结节及滤泡性肿瘤良恶性危险分层中的诊断效能
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Aug;213(2):444-450. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20961. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
4
Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier vs gene expression classifier in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules: An institutional experience.阿菲玛基因测序分类器与基因表达分类器在贝塞斯达III类甲状腺结节中的性能:一项机构经验。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2021 Aug;49(8):921-927. doi: 10.1002/dc.24765. Epub 2021 May 22.
5
UTILITY OF AFIRMA GENE EXPRESSION CLASSIFIER FOR EVALUATION OF INDETERMINATE THYROID NODULES AND CORRELATION WITH ULTRASOUND RISK ASSESSMENT: SINGLE INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE.AFIRMA 基因表达分类器在评估不确定甲状腺结节中的效用及其与超声风险评估的相关性:单机构经验。
Endocr Pract. 2020 May;26(5):543-551. doi: 10.4158/EP-2019-0350. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
6
Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier Compared with Gene Expression Classifier in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.在不确定甲状腺结节中,Affirma 基因测序分类器与基因表达分类器的比较。
Thyroid. 2019 Aug;29(8):1115-1124. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0733. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
Qualifiers of atypia in the cytologic diagnosis of thyroid nodules are associated with different Afirma gene expression classifier results and clinical outcomes.甲状腺结节细胞诊断中异型性的限定词与不同的Afirma基因表达分类器结果及临床结局相关。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 May;125(5):313-322. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21827. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
8
Validation of American Thyroid Association Ultrasound Risk Assessment of Thyroid Nodules Selected for Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration.美国甲状腺协会超声评估甲状腺结节细针抽吸术适应证的验证。
Thyroid. 2017 Aug;27(8):1077-1082. doi: 10.1089/thy.2016.0555. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
9
UTILITY OF ULTRASOUND VERSUS GENE EXPRESSION CLASSIFIER IN THYROID NODULES WITH ATYPIA OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE.超声与基因表达分类器在不明确意义的甲状腺结节中的应用。
Endocr Pract. 2016 Oct;22(10):1199-1203. doi: 10.4158/EP161231.OR. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
10
Risk Stratification in Patients With Follicular Neoplasm on Cytology: Use of Quantitative Characteristics and Sonographic Patterns.细胞病理学滤泡性肿瘤患者的风险分层:定量特征和超声模式的应用。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Apr 30;12:614630. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.614630. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of Afirma gene expression classifier, Afirma gene sequencing classifier, ThyroSeq v2 and ThyroSeq v3 for indeterminate (Bethesda III and IV) thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis.Afirma基因表达分类器、Afirma基因测序分类器、ThyroSeq v2和ThyroSeq v3对不确定(贝塞斯达III级和IV级)甲状腺结节的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Endocr Connect. 2024 Jun 13;13(7). doi: 10.1530/EC-24-0170. Print 2024 Jul 1.
2
Current State of Molecular Cytology in Thyroid Nodules: Platforms and Their Diagnostic and Theranostic Utility.甲状腺结节分子细胞学的现状:平台及其诊断和治疗诊断效用
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):1759. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061759.
3
Assessing Bias and Limitations of Clinical Validation Studies of Molecular Diagnostic Tests for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
评估用于不确定甲状腺结节的分子诊断检测的临床验证研究的偏倚和局限性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thyroid. 2022 Oct;32(10):1144-1157. doi: 10.1089/thy.2022.0269. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
4
Personalized Diagnosis in Differentiated Thyroid Cancers by Molecular and Functional Imaging Biomarkers: Present and Future.通过分子和功能成像生物标志物实现分化型甲状腺癌的个性化诊断:现状与未来
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 10;12(4):944. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040944.
5
Thyroseq v3, Afirma GSC, and microRNA Panels Versus Previous Molecular Tests in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Thyroseq v3、Afiirma GSC 和 microRNA 面板与术前诊断不确定甲状腺结节的先前分子检测的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 May 13;12:649522. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.649522. eCollection 2021.