Hannoush Zeina C, Ruiz-Cordero Roberto, Jara Mark, Kargi Atil Y
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):1759. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061759.
The high prevalence of thyroid nodules and increased availability of neck ultrasound have led to an increased incidence of diagnostic thyroid fine needle aspirations, with approximately 20% yielding indeterminate results. The recent availability of molecular tests has helped guide the clinical management of these cases. This paper aims to review and compare three main commercially available molecular cytology platforms in the U.S.-Afirma GSC, Thyroseq GC, and ThyGeNEXT + ThyraMIR. Sequential improvements of the Afirma GSC and Thyroseq GC tests have increased positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity. Comparative studies revealed similar diagnostic performance between these tests, with considerations for factors such as cost and processing time. Thyroseq GC provides detailed genomic information and specific management recommendations. ThyGeNEXT + ThyraMIR, though less studied, presents promising results, particularly in miRNA analysis for weak driver mutations. Challenges in interpreting results include variations in reporting and the evolving nature of testing platforms. Questions persist regarding cost-effectiveness and the utility of ultrasound characteristics in selecting candidates for molecular testing. While molecular testing has primarily served diagnostic purposes, advancements in understanding genetic alterations now offer therapeutic implications. FDA-approved options target specific genetic alterations, signaling a promising future for tailored treatments.
甲状腺结节的高患病率以及颈部超声检查的可及性增加,导致诊断性甲状腺细针穿刺的发生率上升,约20%的结果为不确定。最近分子检测的出现有助于指导这些病例的临床管理。本文旨在回顾和比较美国三种主要的商业分子细胞学平台——Afirma GSC、Thyroseq GC以及ThyGeNEXT + ThyraMIR。Afirma GSC和Thyroseq GC检测的相继改进提高了阳性和阴性预测值、敏感性和特异性。比较研究显示这些检测之间的诊断性能相似,同时要考虑成本和处理时间等因素。Thyroseq GC提供详细的基因组信息和具体的管理建议。ThyGeNEXT + ThyraMIR虽然研究较少,但呈现出有前景的结果,尤其是在用于检测弱驱动突变的miRNA分析方面。结果解读中的挑战包括报告的差异以及检测平台的不断不断变化的性质。关于成本效益以及超声特征在选择分子检测候选者中的效用问题依然存在。虽然分子检测主要用于诊断目的,但目前在理解基因改变方面的进展具有治疗意义。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的选项针对特定的基因改变,为个性化治疗预示着一个充满希望的未来。