• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

膜生物反应器和快速砂滤在城市污水处理厂去除微塑料中的应用。

Membrane bioreactor and rapid sand filtration for the removal of microplastics in an urban wastewater treatment plant.

机构信息

Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Cartagena, Paseo Alfonso XIII 44, E-30203 Cartagena, Spain.

Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Cartagena, Paseo Alfonso XIII 44, E-30203 Cartagena, Spain.

出版信息

Mar Pollut Bull. 2020 Jul;156:111211. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111211. Epub 2020 May 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111211
PMID:32365007
Abstract

This paper discusses about the role of two different wastewater treatment technologies in the abatement of microplastics (MPs) from the final effluent of an urban wastewater treatment plant (WWTP); i.e., membrane bioreactor technology (MBR) and rapid sand filtration (RSF). For this purpose, a WWTP with these two technologies was monitored for 18 months. The average microplastic concentration was 4.40 ± 1.01 MP L for the influent, 0.92 ± 0.21 MP L for MBR, and 1.08 ± 0.28 MP L for RSF, without statistically significant differences for MPs removal between both technologies (F-test = 0.195, p = 0.661). The main MP forms isolated in our study were fibers (1.34 ± 0.23 items L), followed by films (0.59 ± 0.24 items L), fragments (0.20 ± 0.09 items L), and beads (0.02 ± 0.01 items L). All of them probed to be statistically significant reduced after both technologies, but without statistically significant differences between them. The MP removal efficiency was 79.01% and 75.49% for MBR and RSF, respectively, although higher for microplastic particulate forms (MPPs), 98.83% and 95.53%, than for fibers, 57.65% and 53.83% for MBR and RSF, respectively, displaying a selective removal of particulate forms against microfibers. Fourteen different plastic polymers were identified in the influent, only persisting low-density polyethylene (LDPE), nylon (NYL), and polyvinyl (PV) in RSF effluent, and melamine (MUF) after MBR treatment. The MP size ranged from 210 μm, corresponding to NYL fragment form in the influent, to 6.3 mm, corresponding to a red microfiber also from the influent. The maximum MP average size significantly decreased from MBR (1.39 ± 0.15 mm), to RSF (1.15 ± 0.08 mm) and influent (1.05 ± 0.05 mm) (F-test = 4.014, p = 0.019), exhibiting the fiber selection carried out by these advanced technologies for wastewater treatment.

摘要

本文讨论了两种不同的废水处理技术在减少城市污水处理厂(WWTP)最终出水中微塑料(MPs)方面的作用,即膜生物反应器技术(MBR)和快速砂滤技术(RSF)。为此,对采用这两种技术的 WWTP 进行了 18 个月的监测。进水的平均微塑料浓度为 4.40±1.01 MPs/L,MBR 为 0.92±0.21 MPs/L,RSF 为 1.08±0.28 MPs/L,两种技术对 MPs 的去除没有统计学上的显著差异(F 检验=0.195,p=0.661)。本研究中分离出的主要 MP 形态为纤维(1.34±0.23 个/L),其次为薄膜(0.59±0.24 个/L)、碎片(0.20±0.09 个/L)和小球(0.02±0.01 个/L)。所有这些形态在经过两种技术处理后均有统计学意义上的减少,但两者之间没有统计学意义上的差异。MBR 和 RSF 的 MP 去除效率分别为 79.01%和 75.49%,但对微塑料颗粒形态(MPPs)的去除效率更高,分别为 98.83%和 95.53%,而对纤维的去除效率分别为 57.65%和 53.83%,MBR 和 RSF 分别表现出对颗粒形态的选择性去除。在进水中共鉴定出 14 种不同的塑料聚合物,只有低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)、尼龙(NYL)和聚氯乙烯(PV)在 RSF 出水中残留,而经过 MBR 处理后则只有三聚氰胺(MUF)残留。MP 的尺寸范围从 210μm,对应进水中的 NYL 碎片形态,到 6.3mm,对应进水中的红色微纤维。MBR(1.39±0.15mm)、RSF(1.15±0.08mm)和进水(1.05±0.05mm)的 MP 平均尺寸显著减小(F 检验=4.014,p=0.019),表明这些先进的废水处理技术对纤维具有选择性。

相似文献

1
Membrane bioreactor and rapid sand filtration for the removal of microplastics in an urban wastewater treatment plant.膜生物反应器和快速砂滤在城市污水处理厂去除微塑料中的应用。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2020 Jul;156:111211. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111211. Epub 2020 May 4.
2
Solutions to microplastic pollution - Removal of microplastics from wastewater effluent with advanced wastewater treatment technologies.解决微塑料污染问题 - 利用先进的废水处理技术从废水中去除微塑料。
Water Res. 2017 Oct 15;123:401-407. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 2.
3
Occurrence, characteristics, and removal of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants located on the Moroccan Atlantic: The case of Agadir metropolis.摩洛哥大西洋沿岸污水处理厂中微塑料的出现、特征及去除:以阿加迪尔市为例
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Mar 1;862:160815. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160815. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
4
Microplastics removal efficiency and risk analysis of wastewater treatment plants in Oman.阿曼污水处理厂的微塑料去除效率及风险分析。
Chemosphere. 2024 Jul;359:142206. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142206. Epub 2024 May 4.
5
Occurrence, identification and removal of microplastic particles and fibers in conventional activated sludge process and advanced MBR technology.常规活性污泥工艺和先进 MBR 技术中微塑料颗粒和纤维的出现、识别和去除。
Water Res. 2018 Apr 15;133:236-246. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.049. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
6
Tracing the fate of microplastic in wastewater treatment plant: A multi-stage analysis of treatment units and sludge.追踪微塑料在污水处理厂中的命运:处理单元和污泥的多阶段分析。
Environ Pollut. 2023 Sep 15;333:122072. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122072. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
Abundance and removal characteristics of microplastics at a wastewater treatment plant in Zhengzhou.郑州市某污水处理厂的微塑料丰度及去除特性。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(29):36295-36305. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09611-5. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
8
Selective microbial attachment to LDPE plastic beads during passage through the wastewater network.在通过废水管网的过程中,选择性微生物附着在 LDPE 塑料珠上。
Chemosphere. 2024 Aug;362:142618. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142618. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
9
Seasonal variation and removal of microplastics in a central Asian urban wastewater treatment plant.中亚城市污水处理厂中微塑料的季节性变化及其去除。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2024 Aug;205:116597. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116597. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
10
Abundance and characteristics of microplastics in an urban wastewater treatment plant in Turkey.土耳其某城市污水处理厂中微塑料的丰度和特性。
Environ Pollut. 2022 Oct 1;310:119890. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119890. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Microplastic contamination and removal efficiency in greywater treatment using a membrane bioreactor.膜生物反应器处理灰水中的微塑料污染及去除效率
Front Microbiol. 2025 May 22;16:1519230. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1519230. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of Microfiltration Membrane Configuration in Microplastics Recovery from Wastewater Treatment Effluent.微滤膜构型对从污水处理厂出水回收微塑料的影响。
Membranes (Basel). 2025 May 2;15(5):137. doi: 10.3390/membranes15050137.
3
Remediation of Micro- and Nanoplastics by Membrane Technologies.
膜技术修复微塑料和纳米塑料
Membranes (Basel). 2025 Mar 5;15(3):82. doi: 10.3390/membranes15030082.
4
Cationic Nanoparticle Networks (CNNs) with Remarkably Efficient, Simultaneous Adsorption of Microplastics and PFAS.具有高效同时吸附微塑料和全氟烷基物质能力的阳离子纳米颗粒网络(CNN)
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025 Feb 19;17(7):10732-10744. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c21249. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
5
Microplastics in anaerobic digestion: occurrence, impact, and mitigation strategies.厌氧消化中的微塑料:存在情况、影响及缓解策略。
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2024 Jun 18;22(2):397-411. doi: 10.1007/s40201-024-00910-4. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
The Influence of Textile Type, Textile Weight, and Detergent Dosage on Microfiber Emissions from Top-Loading Washing Machines.纺织物类型、纺织物重量和洗涤剂用量对顶装式洗衣机微纤维排放的影响
Toxics. 2024 Mar 12;12(3):210. doi: 10.3390/toxics12030210.
7
Elimination microplastic particles in brine process water for ensuring the safety of brined cabbage.去除腌制工艺用水中的微塑料颗粒以确保腌制白菜的安全。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 10;10(4):e25984. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25984. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
8
Microplastic Removal in Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) by Natural Coagulation: A Literature Review.通过自然混凝去除污水处理厂中的微塑料:文献综述
Toxics. 2023 Dec 22;12(1):12. doi: 10.3390/toxics12010012.
9
Investigating the efficiency of oak powder as a new natural coagulant for eliminating polystyrene microplastics from aqueous solutions.研究橡木粉作为一种新型天然混凝剂从水溶液中去除聚苯乙烯微塑料的效率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47849-4.
10
Microplastics removal technologies from aqueous environments: a systematic review.水环境中微塑料的去除技术:系统综述
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2023 Aug 17;21(2):463-473. doi: 10.1007/s40201-023-00872-z. eCollection 2023 Dec.