Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷的出血风险比较:倾向评分匹配分析。

Bleeding risk of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in intensive care unit patients with acute coronary syndrome: A propensity-score matching analysis.

机构信息

Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre hospitalier universitaire Félix Guyon, La Réunion, Saint-Denis, France.

Unité de Soutien Méthodologique, Centre hospitalier universitaire Félix Guyon, La Réunion, Saint-Denis, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 May 4;15(5):e0232768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232768. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients with the most severe forms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) require invasive therapies such as extracorporeal life support. The risk of bleeding in ICU patients with ACS treated with a dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and ticagrelor is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to compare the bleeding risk of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in ICU patients with ACS.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted a retrospective study based on a propensity score and a proportional hazards model. All patients with ACS hospitalized in the ICU of a French university hospital between January 2013 and January 2017 were included in the study. Bleeding during ICU stay was defined as all Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major or minor events. A total of 155 patients were included in the study. According to propensity score matching, 57 patients treated with aspirin and ticagrelor were matched with 57 patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel. Median (first-third quartile) Simplified Acute Physiology Score II was 61.5 (41.0-85.0). Bleeding during ICU stay occurred in 12 patients (21.1%) treated with clopidogrel and in 35 patients (61.4%) treated with ticagrelor (p<0.0001). This significant association was found for both TIMI major bleeding (12.3% vs. 35.1%, p = 0.004) and TIMI minor bleeding (8.8% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.01). The relative risk of bleeding occurrence during ICU stay was 2.60 (confidence interval 95%: 1.55-4.35) for ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel. No significant difference in ICU mortality was found between the two groups (45.6% in the clopidogrel group vs. 29.8% in the ticagrelor group, p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Bleeding complications are frequent and serious in ICU patients with ACS. A dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and ticagrelor is associated with a higher risk of bleeding compared to a dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and clopidogrel.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)中患有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)最严重形式的患者需要进行体外生命支持等侵入性治疗。接受阿司匹林和替格瑞洛双联抗血小板治疗的 ACS ICU 患者的出血风险尚不清楚。本研究的主要目的是比较替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷在 ACS ICU 患者中的出血风险。

方法和发现

我们进行了一项基于倾向评分和比例风险模型的回顾性研究。2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 1 月期间,法国一所大学医院 ICU 收治的所有 ACS 患者均纳入本研究。ICU 住院期间出血定义为所有心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)大出血或小出血事件。共纳入 155 例患者。根据倾向评分匹配,将 57 例接受阿司匹林和替格瑞洛治疗的患者与 57 例接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗的患者进行匹配。中位(第一至第三四分位数)简化急性生理学评分 II 为 61.5(41.0-85.0)。接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者中有 12 例(21.1%)和接受替格瑞洛治疗的患者中有 35 例(61.4%)发生 ICU 期间出血(p<0.0001)。TIMI 大出血(12.3%比 35.1%,p=0.004)和 TIMI 小出血(8.8%比 26.3%,p=0.01)均有显著相关性。与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛发生 ICU 期间出血的相对风险为 2.60(95%置信区间:1.55-4.35)。两组 ICU 死亡率无显著差异(氯吡格雷组 45.6%,替格瑞洛组 29.8%,p=0.08)。

结论

ACS ICU 患者出血并发症频繁且严重。与阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗相比,阿司匹林和替格瑞洛双联抗血小板治疗与更高的出血风险相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5949/7197796/56f5d568a486/pone.0232768.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验