Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2024 Mar;31(2):141-155. doi: 10.1007/s40292-024-00635-3. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
Patients of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at a high-bleeding risk (HBR) often require dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Clopidogrel and ticagrelor are the most commonly used antiplatelet agents in DAPT regimens. However, the safety profiles of these drugs in ACS patients at HBR remain a subject of ongoing debate.
To investigate any difference between the safety of clopidogrel and ticagrelor used as a part of DAPT regimen in ACS patients at HBR.
A systematic search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify experimental and observational studies published up to the knowledge cutoff date in September 2023. Studies comparing the safety of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in ACS patients at HBR were included for analysis. The primary outcomes assessed were major bleeding events, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI), while secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE).
We included a total of 8 observational studies in our meta-analysis. The pooled analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in the risk of MI (pooled RR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.12-1.83; P = 0.005) in the patients using clopidogrel. There were no statistically significant differences in major bleeding events (pooled RR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.82-1.09; P = 0.44), stroke (pooled RR = 1.36; 95% CI 0.86-2.14; P = 0.18), all-cause mortality (pooled RR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.97-1.41; P = 0.10), MACCE (pooled RR = 1.07; 95% CI 0.76-1.50; P = 0.69) and NACCE (pooled RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.66-1.37; P = 0.78) between the two groups. Subgroup analyses based on region were performed.
Both drugs are generally safe for treating ACS patients with HBR at baseline, although a higher risk of MI was observed with the use of clopidogrel. Nevertheless, drug choice should factor in regional variations, patient-specific characteristics, cost, accessibility, and potential drug interactions.
患有急性冠脉综合征(ACS)且出血风险高(HBR)的患者通常需要双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)以降低复发性心血管事件的风险。氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛是 DAPT 方案中最常用的抗血小板药物。然而,这些药物在 HBR 的 ACS 患者中的安全性仍存在争议。
研究在 HBR 的 ACS 患者中,DAPT 方案中使用氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛的安全性差异。
对 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Google Scholar 进行了系统检索,以确定截至 2023 年 9 月知识截止日期发表的实验和观察性研究。纳入了比较 HBR 的 ACS 患者中氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛安全性的研究进行分析。主要结局评估为主要出血事件、卒中和心肌梗死(MI),次要结局包括全因死亡率、主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)和净不良临床和脑事件(NACCE)。
我们的荟萃分析共纳入了 8 项观察性研究。汇总分析显示,使用氯吡格雷的患者 MI 风险增加(汇总 RR = 1.43;95%CI 1.12-1.83;P = 0.005)具有统计学意义。两组之间在主要出血事件(汇总 RR = 0.94;95%CI 0.82-1.09;P = 0.44)、卒(汇总 RR = 1.36;95%CI 0.86-2.14;P = 0.18)、全因死亡率(汇总 RR = 1.17;95%CI 0.97-1.41;P = 0.10)、MACCE(汇总 RR = 1.07;95%CI 0.76-1.50;P = 0.69)和 NACCE(汇总 RR = 0.95;95%CI 0.66-1.37;P = 0.78)方面无统计学差异。
两种药物在治疗基线时 HBR 的 ACS 患者时通常都是安全的,尽管使用氯吡格雷时观察到 MI 风险较高。然而,药物选择应考虑到区域差异、患者个体特征、成本、可及性和潜在的药物相互作用。