Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore.
Anticancer Res. 2020 May;40(5):2419-2428. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14211.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Management strategies such as surgery and systemic therapy (androgen-deprivation therapy and chemotherapy) are considered a standard of care for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer and have shown some positive results in many patients. However, they are often accompanied by side-effects that can negatively affect patients. The aim of this study is to review the potential of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of oligometastatic prostate cancer and to compare treatment outcomes with SBRT to those under standard of care management regarding progression-free survival (PFS), androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival and local control rate (LCR) as well as a comparison of toxicity profiles.
MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched to identify prospective randomised controlled trials as well as retrospective studies investigating SBRT and standard of care management for oligometastatic prostate cancer. Data on treatment outcomes and toxicity profiles were extracted.
A total of 18 studies were included: 14 reported on the use of SBRT and four reported on the use of standard of care management. For SBRT, median PFS was 7.36-24 months. Median ADT-free survival was 12.3-39.7 months. The LCR varied, with some reports of 100% at 6 months and others of 92% at 5 years. No significant grade 3 toxicity was reported, with only five grade 3 events reported in two studies. For standard of care management, most of the studies reported 3-year PFS of 46.9-58.6%, with one study reporting a median PFS of 38.6 months. No standard of care study reported on LCR and ADT-free survival. Although different toxicity grading systems were used depending on the treatment modality, there were some reports of grade 3 events using standard of care management.
SBRT appears to be a safe and effective modality for treating oligometastatic prostate cancer, having the potential to defer palliative ADT. Although LCR is excellent compared to conventional therapies, the PFS rate is reportedly inferior to standard of care therapies. No significant grade 3 toxicity was observed with SBRT.
背景/目的:手术和全身治疗(去势治疗和化疗)等治疗策略被认为是寡转移前列腺癌患者的标准治疗方法,并且在许多患者中已显示出一些积极的结果。但是,它们通常伴有副作用,会对患者产生负面影响。本研究旨在回顾立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)在寡转移前列腺癌治疗中的潜力,并比较 SBRT 与标准治疗管理在无进展生存期(PFS)、去势治疗(ADT)无进展生存期和局部控制率(LCR)方面的治疗结果,以及毒性概况的比较。
检索 MEDLINE(PubMed)、EMBASE 和 Clinicaltrials.gov 数据库,以确定前瞻性随机对照试验以及调查 SBRT 和寡转移前列腺癌标准治疗管理的回顾性研究。提取治疗结果和毒性概况的数据。
共纳入 18 项研究:14 项报告了 SBRT 的使用,4 项报告了标准治疗管理的使用。对于 SBRT,中位 PFS 为 7.36-24 个月。中位 ADT 无进展生存期为 12.3-39.7 个月。LCR 有所不同,一些报告的 6 个月时为 100%,而另一些报告的 5 年时为 92%。未报告明显的 3 级毒性,只有两项研究报告了 5 例 3 级事件。对于标准治疗管理,大多数研究报告的 3 年 PFS 为 46.9-58.6%,一项研究报告的中位 PFS 为 38.6 个月。没有标准治疗研究报告 LCR 和 ADT 无进展生存期。尽管根据治疗方式使用了不同的毒性分级系统,但一些标准治疗管理报告了 3 级事件。
SBRT 似乎是治疗寡转移前列腺癌的一种安全有效的方法,有可能推迟姑息性 ADT。尽管与传统疗法相比,LCR 非常出色,但报道的 PFS 率不如标准治疗。SBRT 未观察到明显的 3 级毒性。