Suppr超能文献

分析 50 多年来美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)违反噪声标准的情况:1972 年至 2019 年。

Analysis of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) noise standard violations over 50 years: 1972 to 2019.

机构信息

Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, College of Nursing, Chicago University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Preventive Medicine Residency Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2020 Jul;63(7):616-623. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23116. Epub 2020 May 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Noise exposure has long been an occupational health concern and has been an important area of focus of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) since its founding. Nevertheless, it remains unclear what effects OSHA's noise standards have had on employer efforts to reduce risks. Consequently, a review of OSHA noise standard violations was performed to clarify the violation trends between 1972 and 2019.

METHODS

Using the OSHA Information System, researchers identified 119 305 violations involving four noise standards between 1972 and 2019: 29 CFR 1910.95, occupational noise exposure in general industry; 1926.52, occupational noise exposure in construction; 1926.101, hearing protection in construction, and 1904.10, recording criteria for cases involving occupational hearing loss. Violation frequencies of noise standard subparagraphs and relationships to factors such as industry differences were analyzed using descriptive statistics and t tests.

RESULTS

The most commonly violated noise standard was 1910.95 in manufacturing. Such violations rose between 1972 and 1985 and then declined steadily. Whether in general industry or construction, four noise standards were most-frequently cited: lack of feasible administrative or engineering controls (1910.95[b] and 1926.52[d]) and inadequate hearing conservation program (1910.95[c] and 1926.52[b]). These violations were more highly penalized (mean = $1036.50) than other subparagraph violations (mean = $915.80). Programmed and unprogrammed inspections generated similar violation quantities except between 1980 and 1985, when programmed inspections exhibited a sharp spike in violations.

CONCLUSION

The study identified trends in OSHA noise standard violations and possible explanations for those trends. The study findings can support development of more practical noise-exposure protection policy.

摘要

简介

长期以来,噪声暴露一直是职业健康关注的问题,也是职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)自成立以来的一个重要重点领域。然而,目前尚不清楚 OSHA 的噪声标准对雇主降低风险的努力产生了什么影响。因此,对 OSHA 噪声标准违规行为进行了审查,以澄清 1972 年至 2019 年之间的违规趋势。

方法

研究人员使用 OSHA 信息系统,确定了 1972 年至 2019 年间涉及四项噪声标准的 119305 项违规行为:29 CFR 1910.95,一般工业中的职业噪声暴露;1926.52,建筑中的职业噪声暴露;1926.101,建筑中的听力保护;1904.10,职业性听力损失案例的记录标准。使用描述性统计和 t 检验分析了噪声标准子段落的违规频率以及与行业差异等因素的关系。

结果

违反最普遍的噪声标准是制造业中的 1910.95。此类违规行为在 1972 年至 1985 年间上升,然后稳步下降。无论是在一般工业还是建筑中,四个噪声标准最常被引用:缺乏可行的行政或工程控制(1910.95[b]和 1926.52[d])和不充分的听力保护计划(1910.95[c]和 1926.52[b])。这些违规行为的处罚力度更高(平均值为$1036.50),高于其他子段落违规行为(平均值为$915.80)。计划和非计划检查产生了类似的违规数量,除了 1980 年至 1985 年期间,计划检查的违规数量急剧上升。

结论

该研究确定了 OSHA 噪声标准违规行为的趋势和这些趋势的可能解释。研究结果可以支持制定更实用的噪声暴露保护政策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验