Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Oncologist. 2020 Jul;25(7):e1060-e1069. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0904. Epub 2020 May 8.
Advanced gynecologic cancers have a poor prognosis and constitute a major challenge for adequate treatment strategies. By analyzing and targeting molecular alterations, molecular guided treatments may be a viable option for the treatment of advanced gynecologic cancers.
In this single-center, real-world retrospective analysis of our platform for precision cancer medicine (PCM), we describe the molecular profiling of 72 patients diagnosed with different types of advanced gynecologic malignancies. Tumor samples of the patients were examined by next-generation sequencing panel and immunohistochemistry (IHC).
In total, we identified 209 genetic aberrations in 72 patients. The ten most frequent alterations were TP53 (n = 42, 20%), KRAS (n = 14, 6.6%), PIK3CA (n = 11, 5.2%), PIK3R1 (n = 9, 4.3%), ATR (n = 8, 3.8%), PTEN (n = 8, 3.8%), BRCA1 (n = 6, 2.8%), NF1 (n = 4, 1.9%), NOTCH1 (n = 4, 1.9%), and POLE (n = 4, 1.9%), which account for more than half of all molecular alterations (52.6%). In 21 (29.1%) patients only one mutation could be detected, and 44 (61.1%) patients had more than one mutation. No molecular alterations were detected in seven (9.7%) patients. IHC detected expression of phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin and epidermal growth factor receptor in 58 (80.6%) and 53 (73.6%) patients, respectively. In over two thirds (n = 49, 68.1%), a targeted therapy was suggested, based on the identified genetic aberrations. The most frequently recommended specific treatment was the combination of everolimus with exemestane (n = 18, 25 %).
Based on our observations, it seems that PCM might be a feasible approach for advanced gynecologic cancers with limited treatment options.
Nowadays molecular profiling of advanced gynecologic malignancies is feasible in the clinical routine. A molecular portrait should be done for every patient with an advanced therapy-refractory gynecologic malignancy to offer molecular-based treatment concepts.
晚期妇科癌症预后较差,是充分治疗策略面临的主要挑战。通过分析和靶向分子改变,分子指导治疗可能成为治疗晚期妇科癌症的可行选择。
在我们精准癌症医学(PCM)平台的这项单中心、真实世界回顾性分析中,我们描述了 72 例不同类型晚期妇科恶性肿瘤患者的分子分析情况。对患者的肿瘤样本进行下一代测序面板和免疫组织化学(IHC)检查。
我们共在 72 例患者中鉴定出 209 种基因异常。最常见的十种改变为 TP53(n = 42,20%)、KRAS(n = 14,6.6%)、PIK3CA(n = 11,5.2%)、PIK3R1(n = 9,4.3%)、ATR(n = 8,3.8%)、PTEN(n = 8,3.8%)、BRCA1(n = 6,2.8%)、NF1(n = 4,1.9%)、NOTCH1(n = 4,1.9%)和 POLE(n = 4,1.9%),这些改变占所有分子改变的一半以上(52.6%)。21 例(29.1%)患者仅检测到一种突变,44 例(61.1%)患者有多种突变。7 例(9.7%)患者未检测到分子改变。58 例(80.6%)和 53 例(73.6%)患者的 IHC 分别检测到磷酸化哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白和表皮生长因子受体的表达。基于鉴定出的基因异常,超过三分之二(n = 49,68.1%)的患者建议进行靶向治疗。最常推荐的具体治疗方法是依维莫司联合依西美坦(n = 18,25%)。
根据我们的观察,PCM 似乎是治疗选择有限的晚期妇科癌症的可行方法。
目前,晚期妇科恶性肿瘤的分子分析在临床常规中是可行的。对于晚期妇科恶性肿瘤患者,在进行标准治疗后疾病进展,应该对每一位患者进行分子分析,以提供基于分子的治疗方案。