Department of Medical Physics, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Department of Medical Physics, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Phys Med. 2020 May;73:179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 May 1.
The aim of this study is to introduce a novel DWI-MRI phantom and to compare Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) measurements, utilizing EPI-DWI and HASTE-DWI sequences and two different fitting algorithms.
23 test tubes with different sucrose concentrations and polyacrylamide gels were used as a phantom for ADC measurements. The phantom was scanned on a clinical MRI system (1.5 T) over a two-month period utilizing an EPI-DWI and a HASTE-DWI sequence. ADC maps were calculated using a Weighted Linear (WL) and a Non Linear (NL) fitting algorithm. Measurements were performed with two sequences and two fitting algorithms. Geometric Distortions (GD), Ghosting Ratios (GR) and Signal to Structured Noise Ratios (SSNRs) were estimated using both sequences from the resultant ADC parametric maps.
Polyacrylamide gels reveal lower coefficient of variation (CV%) as compared to sucrose solutions. ADC measurements performed with WL and NL algorithms reveal identical results with both sequences. WL and NL algorithms require approx. 3 s and 7 min respectively, for a single slice. EPI-DWI reveals a mean percent ADC value difference of (+4.5%) as compared to HASTE-DWI, regardless the type of fitting algorithm.
Polyacrylamide gels can serve as a better means for simulating ADC values, compared with sucrose solutions used in this study. WL can be proposed as the method for ADC measurements in daily clinical practice. WL is significantly faster than NL fitting method and equally precise. SSNR measured directly on ADC maps is an excellent means for testing the precision of ADC measurements.
本研究旨在介绍一种新的 DWI-MRI 体模,并比较利用 EPI-DWI 和 HASTE-DWI 序列及两种不同拟合算法进行表观扩散系数(ADC)测量的结果。
本研究使用 23 个装有不同蔗糖浓度和聚丙烯酰胺凝胶的试管作为 ADC 测量的体模。在两个月的时间里,使用临床 MRI 系统(1.5T)对体模进行 EPI-DWI 和 HASTE-DWI 序列扫描。使用加权线性(WL)和非线性(NL)拟合算法计算 ADC 图。用两种序列和两种拟合算法进行测量。利用两种序列从所得 ADC 参数图中估计几何变形(GD)、鬼影比(GR)和信号与结构噪声比(SSNR)。
聚丙烯酰胺凝胶的变异系数(CV%)较蔗糖溶液低。WL 和 NL 算法在两种序列上进行的 ADC 测量结果相同。WL 和 NL 算法分别需要大约 3s 和 7min 来获取单个切片的结果。EPI-DWI 与 HASTE-DWI 相比,无论拟合算法类型如何,其平均 ADC 值差异为(+4.5%)。
与本研究中使用的蔗糖溶液相比,聚丙烯酰胺凝胶可以作为模拟 ADC 值的更好手段。在日常临床实践中,可以提出 WL 作为 ADC 测量的方法。WL 比 NL 拟合方法快得多,但精度相当。直接在 ADC 图上测量的 SSNR 是测试 ADC 测量精度的一种极好手段。