Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA.
Med Phys. 2024 Aug;51(8):5386-5398. doi: 10.1002/mp.17067. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
MRI-Linac systems enable daily diffusion-weighed imaging (DWI) MRI scans for assessing glioblastoma tumor changes with radiotherapy treatment.
Our study assessed the image quality of echoplanar imaging (EPI)-DWI scans compared with turbo spin echo (TSE)-DWI scans at 0.35 Tesla (T) and compared the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and distortion of EPI-DWI on 0.35 T MRI-Linac compared to high-field diagnostic MRI scanners.
The calibrated National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)/Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) Diffusion Phantom was scanned on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac, and 1.5 T and 3 T MRI with EPI-DWI. Five patients were scanned on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac with a TSE-DWI sequence, and five other patients were scanned with EPI-DWI on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac and a 3 T MRI. The quality of images was compared between the TSE-DWI and EPI-DWI on the 0.35 T MRI-Linac assessing signal-to-noise ratios and presence of artifacts. EPI-DWI ADC values and distortion magnitude were measured and compared between 0.35 T MRI-Linac and high-field MRI for both phantom and patient studies.
The average ADC differences between EPI-DWI acquired on the 0.35 T MRI-Linac, 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scanners and published references in the phantom study were 1.7%, 0.4% and 1.0%, respectively. Comparing the ADC values based on EPI-DWI in glioblastoma tumors, there was a 3.36% difference between 0.35 and 3 T measurements. Susceptibility-induced distortions in the EPI-DWI phantoms were 0.46 ± 1.51 mm for 0.35 MRI-Linac, 0.98 ± 0.51 mm for 1.5 T MRI and 1.14 ± 1.88 mm for 3 T MRI; for patients -0.47 ± 0.78 mm for 0.35 T and 1.73 ± 2.11 mm for 3 T MRIs. The mean deformable registration distortion for a phantom was 1.1 ± 0.22 mm, 3.5 ± 0.39 mm and 4.7 ± 0.37 mm for the 0.35 T MRI-Linac, 1.5 T MRI, and 3 T MRI scanners, respectively; for patients this distortion was -0.46 ± 0.57 mm for 0.35 T and 4.2 ± 0.41 mm for 3 T. EPI-DWI 0.35 T MRI-Linac images showed higher SNR and lack of artifacts compared with TSE-DWI, especially at higher b-values up to 1000 s/mm.
EPI-DWI on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac showed superior image quality compared with TSE-DWI, minor and less distortions than high-field diagnostic scanners, and comparable ADC values in phantoms and glioblastoma tumors. EPI-DWI should be investigated on the 0.35 T MRI-Linac for prediction of early response in patients with glioblastoma.
MRI-直线加速器系统能够每天进行扩散加权成像(DWI)MRI 扫描,以评估脑胶质瘤肿瘤在放射治疗过程中的变化。
本研究评估了在 0.35T 磁共振直线加速器上与涡轮自旋回波(TSE)-DWI 扫描相比,平面回波成像(EPI)-DWI 扫描的图像质量,并比较了在 0.35T MRI-直线加速器上与高场诊断 MRI 扫描仪上的表观扩散系数(ADC)值和 EPI-DWI 的失真。
使用校准的美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)/定量成像生物标志物联盟(QIBA)扩散体模在 0.35T MRI-直线加速器、1.5T 和 3T MRI 上进行 EPI-DWI 扫描。在 0.35T MRI-直线加速器上对 5 例患者进行 TSE-DWI 序列扫描,在 0.35T MRI-直线加速器和 3T MRI 上对 5 例患者进行 EPI-DWI 扫描。在 0.35T MRI-直线加速器上比较 TSE-DWI 和 EPI-DWI 之间的图像质量,评估信噪比和伪影的存在。测量并比较 0.35T MRI-直线加速器和高场 MRI 中体模和患者研究的 EPI-DWI ADC 值和失真程度。
在体模研究中,EPI-DWI 在 0.35T MRI-直线加速器、1.5T 和 3T MRI 扫描仪上获得的平均 ADC 差异分别为 1.7%、0.4%和 1.0%。基于脑胶质瘤肿瘤的 EPI-DWI 比较 ADC 值,0.35T 和 3T 测量值之间存在 3.36%的差异。EPI-DWI 体模中的磁化率诱导失真分别为 0.35 MRI-直线加速器 0.46±1.51mm、1.5T MRI 0.98±0.51mm和 3T MRI 1.14±1.88mm;对于患者,0.35T 为 0.47±0.78mm,3T 为 1.73±2.11mm。体模的平均可变形配准失真分别为 0.35T MRI-直线加速器、1.5T MRI 和 3T MRI 扫描仪的 1.1±0.22mm、3.5±0.39mm 和 4.7±0.37mm;对于患者,这种失真分别为 0.35T 为-0.46±0.57mm,3T 为 4.2±0.41mm。EPI-DWI 0.35T MRI-直线加速器图像显示与 TSE-DWI 相比具有更高的 SNR 和无伪影,特别是在高达 1000 s/mm 的更高 b 值时。
与 TSE-DWI 相比,0.35T MRI-直线加速器上的 EPI-DWI 显示出更好的图像质量,与高场诊断扫描仪相比,失真较小且较少,并且在体模和脑胶质瘤肿瘤中具有可比的 ADC 值。应在 0.35T MRI-直线加速器上对 EPI-DWI 进行研究,以预测脑胶质瘤患者的早期反应。