Suppr超能文献

TNF 拮抗剂在老年溃疡性结肠炎患者中的安全性和疗效:来自随机试验的患者水平汇总分析数据。

Safety and Efficacy of Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists in Older Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of Data From Randomized Trials.

机构信息

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology, Boston, Massachusetts.

Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; University of Michigan, Division of Gastroenterology, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May;19(5):939-946.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.070. Epub 2020 May 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Treatment of older patients (more than 60 years) with ulcerative colitis (UC) can be a challenge, because they might be more vulnerable to adverse events (AEs). We determined the effects of age on the safety and efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in a pooled analysis of data from randomized trials.

METHODS

We obtained individual patient-level data from 4 trials of anti-TNF therapy for patients with UC from the Yale Open Data Access Project. Participants were assigned to groups of older age (60 years or older) and younger age (younger than 60 years). The primary outcome was difference in serious AEs (SAEs), defined as death, life-threatening event, hospitalization, and/or significant disability. Secondary outcomes were severe infections, non-severe infections, neoplasms, and achievement of clinical remission, defined by trial investigators as Mayo score ≤ 2 with no sub-score >1 at the end of induction or maintenance therapy. A random effects logistic regression model was fitted to estimate the effect of anti-TNF therapy on safety and efficacy by age, adjusting for confounders and trial-level effects.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 2257 patients (231 60 years or older). Higher proportions of older patients receiving anti-TNF therapy had SAEs (20%) and hospitalizations (14.4%), compared with younger patients (10.2% had SAEs and 5.2% were hospitalized); there were no significant differences between groups in proportions with severe or non-severe infections. Compared with placebo, there was no significant difference in safety risks associated with anti-TNF therapy (SAEs reduced by 5.4% in older patients vs reduction of 2.4% in younger patients; hospitalizations reduced by 6.7% in older patients vs reduction of 2.5% in younger patients; severe infections reduced by 3.1% vs increase of 0.7% in younger patients). There was no significant difference in between older vs younger patients in efficacy of anti-TNF therapy in inducing remission (odds risk ratio, 1.05, 95% CI, 0.33-3.39) or in maintaining remission (odds risk ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.18-1.33).

CONCLUSIONS

In a pooled analysis of data from randomized trials, we found that older patients with UC have an increased baseline increased risk of SAEs, but no increase in risk can be attributed to anti-TNF therapy in older vs younger patients.

摘要

背景与目的

治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)老年患者(60 岁以上)可能具有挑战性,因为他们更容易发生不良事件(AE)。我们通过对来自随机试验的汇总数据进行分析,确定了年龄对肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)治疗安全性和疗效的影响。

方法

我们从耶鲁大学开放数据访问项目的 4 项 TNF 治疗 UC 患者的临床试验中获得了个体患者水平的数据。参与者被分为年龄较大(60 岁或以上)和年龄较小(60 岁以下)组。主要结局是严重 AE(SAE)的差异,定义为死亡、危及生命的事件、住院和/或显著残疾。次要结局是严重感染、非严重感染、肿瘤和临床缓解的获得,定义为诱导或维持治疗结束时研究者评估的 Mayo 评分≤2,且无任何亚评分>1。采用随机效应逻辑回归模型,通过年龄调整混杂因素和试验水平效应,估计 TNF 治疗对安全性和疗效的影响。

结果

研究队列包括 2257 名患者(231 名 60 岁或以上)。与年轻患者(10.2%发生 SAE,5.2%住院)相比,接受 TNF 治疗的老年患者 SAE(20%)和住院率(14.4%)比例更高;两组严重或非严重感染的比例无显著差异。与安慰剂相比,TNF 治疗的安全性风险没有显著差异(老年患者的 SAE 风险降低 5.4%,年轻患者的 SAE 风险降低 2.4%;老年患者的住院风险降低 6.7%,年轻患者的住院风险降低 2.5%;严重感染风险降低 3.1%,年轻患者的感染风险增加 0.7%)。在诱导缓解和维持缓解方面,老年患者与年轻患者的 TNF 治疗疗效无显著差异(缓解的优势比,1.05,95%CI,0.33-3.39;缓解的优势比,0.49;95%CI,0.18-1.33)。

结论

在对随机试验汇总数据的分析中,我们发现 UC 老年患者的基线 SAE 风险增加,但不能归因于 TNF 治疗在老年患者与年轻患者中的风险增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验