• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济高效的微创妇科手术:强调手术效率。

Cost-effective minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: emphasizing surgical efficiency.

作者信息

Misal Meenal, Delara Ritchie, Wasson Megan N

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;32(4):243-247. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000636.

DOI:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000636
PMID:32371608
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The United States has the highest healthcare costs among developed countries. This review evaluates surgical practices and equipment choices during endoscopic hysterectomy, highlighting opportunities for the gynecologic surgeon to reduce costs and maximize surgical efficiency.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are opportunities to economize at every step of the endoscopic hysterectomy. When surgeons are provided education about instrumentation costs, the cost of hysterectomy has been shown to decrease. Colpotomy has been found to be the rate-limiting step in laparoscopic hysterectomy; use of a uterine manipulator likely saves time and money. When evaluating the economic impact of route of surgery, the cost differential between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy has decreased. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy may be more cost-effective in some cases, such as for larger uteri. From a systems-level perspective, dedicating a specific operating room team to the gynecology service can decrease operative time.

SUMMARY

The gynecologic surgeon is best equipped to control surgery-related costs by making choices that improve surgical efficiency and decrease operating room time. If a costlier piece of equipment leads to a more efficient case, the choice may be more cost-effective. There are multiple systems-level changes that can be implemented to decrease surgery-related costs.

摘要

综述目的

美国在发达国家中医疗保健成本最高。本综述评估了内镜下子宫切除术的手术操作和设备选择,强调了妇科外科医生降低成本并最大化手术效率的机会。

最新发现

内镜下子宫切除术的每一步都有节约成本的机会。当向外科医生提供有关器械成本的教育时,子宫切除术的成本已显示会降低。阴道切开术已被发现是腹腔镜子宫切除术的限速步骤;使用子宫操纵器可能节省时间和金钱。在评估手术途径的经济影响时,腹腔镜和机器人辅助子宫切除术之间的成本差异已缩小。机器人辅助子宫切除术在某些情况下可能更具成本效益,例如对于较大的子宫。从系统层面来看,为妇科服务配备特定的手术室团队可以减少手术时间。

总结

妇科外科医生最有能力通过做出提高手术效率和减少手术室时间的选择来控制与手术相关的成本。如果一件更昂贵的设备能带来更高效的手术,那么这种选择可能更具成本效益。可以实施多种系统层面的改变来降低与手术相关的成本。

相似文献

1
Cost-effective minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: emphasizing surgical efficiency.经济高效的微创妇科手术:强调手术效率。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;32(4):243-247. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000636.
2
Cost analysis of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center: an update in gynecologic oncological field.意大利某中心一名外科医生实施的宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术的成本分析:妇科肿瘤学领域的最新情况
Updates Surg. 2017 Dec;69(4):517-522. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0462-8. Epub 2017 May 15.
3
Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons.高年资妇科医生为肥胖女性实施腹腔镜子宫切除术时,不同肥胖等级的成本差异。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):903-907. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01074-7. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
4
Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center.意大利一家中心由单一外科医生进行的微创子宫切除术与开放手术的成本分析。
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):115-121. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0625-5. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
5
Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.采用机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌5年经验后的成本变化。
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):93-96. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0700-6. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
6
Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.妇科机器人单孔与传统腹腔镜手术:一项配对病例对照研究的临床结局与成本分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
7
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗子宫切除术和盆腔器官脱垂修复。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Oct;102(4):933-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.010.
8
Impact of Robotic Platforms on Surgical Approach and Costs in the Management of Morbidly Obese Patients with Newly Diagnosed Uterine Cancer.机器人平台对新诊断子宫癌的肥胖患者手术方式及治疗费用的影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul;23(7):2192-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5062-6. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
9
Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌和非典型复杂性增生女性的成本分析
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Mar;95(3):299-308. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12820. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
10
Review of strategies and factors to maximize cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomies and myomectomies in benign gynecological disease.回顾优化机器人辅助妇科良性疾病子宫切除术和肌瘤切除术的成本效益的策略和因素。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Oct;13(5):635-642. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00948-9. Epub 2019 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Intracorporeal vs. extracorporeal open and closed knot tying techniques in laparoscopy: A randomized, controlled study.腹腔镜检查中体内与体外开放式和封闭式打结技术的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 26;10(3):e25178. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25178. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
2
Senhance Robotic Platform System for Gynecological Surgery.用于妇科手术的森海斯机器人平台系统
JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00075.