• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与下颌骨切开术和单颌手术相比,Le Fort 1 型和双颌骨切开术会增加住院时间,但不会增加术后并发症。

Le Fort 1 and Bimaxillary Osteotomies Increase the Length of Stay but not Postoperative Morbidity Compared to Mandibular Osteotomies and Single Jaw Procedures.

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital.

Health Informatics, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Sep;31(6):1734-1738. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006514.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000006514
PMID:32371693
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to examine the association between type of facial osteotomies performed during orthognathic surgery and postoperative outcomes including complications, length of stay, and readmission.

METHODS

A retrospective review of orthognathic surgery cases from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database from 2004 to 2014 was undertaken. Osteotomy procedures were classified as Le Fort 1 (LF 1), Mandibular osteotomy, Genioplasty or their combinations. Primary outcome variable was major complications. Secondary outcomes included postoperative LOS > 1 day and 90-day readmission. Random-intercept logistic regression models were utilized to assess the association between the type of osteotomy performed and the outcomes. Bonferroni approach was used to account for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

The sample included 5413 patients, with a mean age of 17.1 ± 1.68 years and 60.65% were female. The most common procedures were LF1 (39.4%), followed by bimaxillary surgery (23%). Major complications occurred in 8.57% of patients, postoperative LOS > 1 day in 52.4% and 90-day all-cause readmission in 11.16%. In adjusted analyses comparing LF1 compared to mandibular osteotomies, there were no significant differences for major complications (OR = 0.78), 90-day readmission rate (OR = 0.98). However, LF1 was associated with an increased odds for LOS compared to mandibular osteotomies (OR = 1.42). Addition of osteotomies is associated with a significant increase in LOS (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing orthognathic surgery demonstrated increased length of stay for LF1 or bimaxillary osteotomies. Osteotomy type did not impact the odds of readmission or complications. The trends revealed should be helpful for patient counseling.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨正颌手术中施行的面骨截骨术类型与术后结果(包括并发症、住院时间和再入院)之间的关系。

方法

对 2004 年至 2014 年期间儿科健康信息系统(PHIS)数据库中的正颌手术病例进行回顾性研究。将截骨术分为 Le Fort 1(LF1)、下颌骨截骨术、颏成形术或它们的组合。主要结局变量为主要并发症。次要结局包括术后住院时间超过 1 天和 90 天再入院。采用随机截距逻辑回归模型评估所施行的截骨术类型与结局之间的关系。采用 Bonferroni 法进行多重比较。

结果

本样本包括 5413 例患者,平均年龄为 17.1±1.68 岁,60.65%为女性。最常见的手术为 LF1(39.4%),其次为双颌手术(23%)。8.57%的患者发生主要并发症,52.4%的患者术后住院时间超过 1 天,11.16%的患者 90 天内全因再入院。在比较 LF1 与下颌骨截骨术的调整分析中,主要并发症(OR=0.78)和 90 天再入院率(OR=0.98)无显著差异。然而,LF1 与下颌骨截骨术相比,住院时间延长的可能性更高(OR=1.42)。增加截骨术与住院时间显著延长相关(P<0.001)。

结论

行正颌手术的患者 LF1 或双颌截骨术的住院时间延长。截骨术类型不影响再入院或并发症的几率。这些趋势对患者咨询应该是有帮助的。

相似文献

1
Le Fort 1 and Bimaxillary Osteotomies Increase the Length of Stay but not Postoperative Morbidity Compared to Mandibular Osteotomies and Single Jaw Procedures.与下颌骨切开术和单颌手术相比,Le Fort 1 型和双颌骨切开术会增加住院时间,但不会增加术后并发症。
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Sep;31(6):1734-1738. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006514.
2
Segmental Maxillary Osteotomies in Conjunction With Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: Indications - Safety - Outcome.节段性上颌骨截骨术联合双颌正颌手术:适应症 - 安全性 - 结果
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1422-40. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.01.051. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
3
Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Early Complications.双颌正颌手术与早期并发症风险增加相关。
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;30(2):352-357. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005026.
4
Operative Time, Airway Management, Need for Blood Transfusions, and In-Hospital Stay for Bimaxillary, Intranasal, and Osseous Genioplasty Surgery: Current Clinical Practices.双颌、鼻内及骨性颏成形术的手术时间、气道管理、输血需求及住院时间:当前临床实践
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;74(3):590-600. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
5
Hypotensive Anesthesia Is Associated With Shortened Length of Hospital Stay Following Orthognathic Surgery.正颌外科手术后,低血压麻醉与缩短住院时间相关。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jan;74(1):130-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.05.025. Epub 2015 May 28.
6
Major Complications and Associated Risk Factors for Osseous Genioplasty With Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: An American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.骨成形术与双颌正颌手术相关的主要并发症及危险因素:美国外科医师学会-国家手术质量改进计划分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(2):632-635. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008141.
7
Major Complications and 30-Day Morbidity for Single Jaw Versus Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery as Reported by NSQIP.根据美国国立外科手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)报告的单颌与双颌正颌手术的主要并发症及30天发病率
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Jul;56(6):705-710. doi: 10.1177/1055665618814402. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
8
Complete Reoperation in Orthognathic Surgery.正颌外科中的完全再手术。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 May;143(5):1053e-1059e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005532.
9
Surgical Site Infections Following Bimaxillary Orthognathic, Osseous Genioplasty, and Intranasal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.双颌正颌手术、颏成形术及鼻内手术后的手术部位感染:一项回顾性队列研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Mar;75(3):584-595. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
Osseous genioplasty in conjunction with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a review of 262 consecutive cases.颏部截骨术联合双颌正颌手术:262例连续病例回顾
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;45(7):904-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Is three-piece maxillary segmentation surgery a stable procedure?三件式上颌骨分割手术是一种稳定的手术吗?
Korean J Orthod. 2024 Mar 25;54(2):128-135. doi: 10.4041/kjod23.166. Epub 2024 Mar 8.