• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

OncotypeDX 指导下的治疗决策与 PREDICT 工具在真实世界早期乳腺癌中的一致性。

The concordance of treatment decision guided by OncotypeDX and the PREDICT tool in real-world early-stage breast cancer.

机构信息

Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, Israel.

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(13):4603-4612. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3088. Epub 2020 May 6.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.3088
PMID:32372569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7333833/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer can be guided by genomic assays such as OncotypeDX. The concordance of expected clinical decisions guided by OncotypeDX and prognostication online tools such as PREDICT is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study comprising all women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative, node negative disease, whose tumors were sent for OncotypeDX analysis. Expected decision on adjuvant chemotherapy was evaluated using OncotypeDX and using PREDICT. The concordance between these two tools was calculated. The impact on concordance of prespecified features was assessed, including age, tumor size, intensity of ER and progesterone receptor (PR), grade, Ki67 and perineural and lymphovascular invasion.

RESULTS

A total of 445 women were included. Overall concordance was 75% (K = 0.284). The concordance was significantly higher for grade 1 disease compared to grade 2-3 (93% vs 72%, P < .001), tumor ≤ 1 cm compared to >1 cm (85% vs 72%, P = .009), PR positive compared to PR negative (78% vs 58%, P < .001) and ki67 < 10% compared to ≥10% (92% vs 63%, P < .001). The intensity of ER and the presence of perineural or lymphovascular invasion had no significant impact on concordance.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to PREDICT, using OncotypeDx in node negative, ER positive disease is expected to change the clinical decision in a quarter of patients. The concordance between OncotypeDx and PREDICT is influenced by pathological features. In patients with very low risk, treatment decisions may be made based solely on clinical risk assessment.

摘要

背景

早期乳腺癌的辅助化疗决策可以通过基因组检测,如 OncotypeDX 来指导。目前尚不清楚 OncotypeDX 指导的预期临床决策与 PREDICT 等预后在线工具的一致性。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性单中心队列研究,纳入所有雌激素受体(ER)阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阴性、淋巴结阴性疾病的女性,其肿瘤均进行了 OncotypeDX 分析。使用 OncotypeDX 和 PREDICT 评估辅助化疗的预期决策。计算这两种工具之间的一致性。评估了包括年龄、肿瘤大小、ER 和孕激素受体(PR)强度、分级、Ki67、神经周围和血管淋巴管浸润在内的特定特征对一致性的影响。

结果

共纳入 445 例女性。总体一致性为 75%(K=0.284)。1 级疾病的一致性明显高于 2-3 级(93% vs 72%,P<.001),肿瘤≤1cm 与>1cm 相比(85% vs 72%,P=.009),PR 阳性与 PR 阴性相比(78% vs 58%,P<.001),Ki67<10%与≥10%相比(92% vs 63%,P<.001)。ER 强度和神经周围或血管淋巴管浸润的存在对一致性没有显著影响。

结论

与 PREDICT 相比,在淋巴结阴性、ER 阳性疾病中使用 OncotypeDx 预计将改变四分之一患者的临床决策。OncotypeDx 与 PREDICT 之间的一致性受病理特征的影响。在低危患者中,治疗决策可能仅基于临床风险评估做出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afee/7333833/c571e27270c0/CAM4-9-4603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afee/7333833/77a7d2cdb2d0/CAM4-9-4603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afee/7333833/c571e27270c0/CAM4-9-4603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afee/7333833/77a7d2cdb2d0/CAM4-9-4603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afee/7333833/c571e27270c0/CAM4-9-4603-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The concordance of treatment decision guided by OncotypeDX and the PREDICT tool in real-world early-stage breast cancer.OncotypeDX 指导下的治疗决策与 PREDICT 工具在真实世界早期乳腺癌中的一致性。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(13):4603-4612. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3088. Epub 2020 May 6.
2
Estimating the OncotypeDX score: validation of an inexpensive estimation tool.评估OncotypeDX评分:一种低成本评估工具的验证
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Feb;161(3):435-441. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4069-4. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
3
Concordance of breast cancer biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry/in situ hybridization and Oncotype DX qRT-PCR with investigation of discordance, a study of 591 cases.常规免疫组织化学/原位杂交与 Oncotype DX qRT-PCR 检测乳腺癌生物标志物状态的一致性,并对其不相符的情况进行了调查,该研究共纳入了 591 例病例。
Hum Pathol. 2020 Oct;104:54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.07.022. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
4
Impact of Oncotype DX breast Recurrence Score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy use in early breast cancer: Real world experience in Greater Manchester, UK.Oncotype DX乳腺复发评分检测对早期乳腺癌辅助化疗使用的影响:英国大曼彻斯特地区的真实世界经验
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 May;43(5):931-937. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.010. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
5
Are we Overtreating Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy? Role of OncotypeDx for Hormone Receptor Positive Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.我们是否过度治疗激素受体阳性乳腺癌的新辅助化疗?OncotypeDx 在激素受体阳性患者新辅助化疗中的作用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3232-3239. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07555-w. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
6
Role of Patient and Disease Factors in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Decision Making for Early-Stage, Operable Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of Cancer Care Ontario Guideline Recommendations.患者和疾病因素在早期可手术乳腺癌辅助全身治疗决策中的作用:美国临床肿瘤学会对安大略癌症护理指南建议的认可。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 1;34(19):2303-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.8609. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
7
Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay compared with standard clinicopathologic guidelines in adjuvant therapy selection for node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.21 基因复发评分检测对淋巴结阴性、雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌辅助治疗选择中标准临床病理指南的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Nov;18(12):3399-406. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1698-z. Epub 2011 May 3.
8
Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer management: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.基因表达谱分析和扩展免疫组织化学检测在乳腺癌管理中指导辅助化疗的应用:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Oct;17(44):1-302. doi: 10.3310/hta17440.
9
Prognostic value of Ki67 expression in HR-negative breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.新辅助化疗前后Ki67表达在HR阴性乳腺癌中的预后价值
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 Sep 15;7(10):6862-70. eCollection 2014.
10
Relationship of pathological features and a 21 gene expression assay in younger versus older women with node-negative endocrine receptor-positive breast cancer.年轻与老年淋巴结阴性内分泌受体阳性乳腺癌女性患者的病理特征与 21 基因表达检测的相关性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jul;176(1):95-100. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-05088-6. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Does RSClin provide additional information over classic clinico-pathologic scores (PREDICT 2.1, INFLUENCE 2.0, CTS5)?与经典临床病理评分(PREDICT 2.1、INFLUENCE 2.0、CTS5)相比,RSClin是否能提供更多信息?
Breast. 2025 Jul 4;83:104528. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104528.
2
Association between pathological characteristics and recurrence score by OncotypeDX in resected T1-3 and N0-1 breast cancer: a real-life experience of a North Hungarian regional center.切除的 T1-3 和 N0-1 乳腺癌中,OncotypeDX 病理特征与复发评分的相关性:北匈牙利地区中心的真实经验。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2024 Apr 16;30:1611735. doi: 10.3389/pore.2024.1611735. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Expected Monetary Impact of Oncotype DX Score-Concordant Systemic Breast Cancer Therapy Based on the TAILORx Trial.基于 TAILORx 试验的 Oncotype DX 评分一致的乳腺癌系统治疗的预期货币影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Feb 1;112(2):154-160. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz068.
2
Clinical and Genomic Risk to Guide the Use of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer.临床和基因组风险指导乳腺癌辅助治疗的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 20;380(25):2395-2405. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904819. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
3
Absolute benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in contemporary clinical trials: A systemic review and meta-analysis.
Development and validation of an extended Cox prognostic model for patients with ER/PR+ and HER2- breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
ER/PR+ 和 HER2- 乳腺癌患者扩展 Cox 预后模型的建立与验证:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct 12;20(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02790-0.
4
The impact of Oncotype DX testing on adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in 1-3 node positive breast cancer.Oncotype DX 检测对 1-3 个淋巴结阳性乳腺癌辅助化疗决策的影响。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022 Aug;5(8):e1546. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1546. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
当代临床试验中辅助化疗的绝对获益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Dec;71:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
4
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.基于 21 基因表达检测的乳腺癌辅助化疗。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):111-121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804710. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of the 21-Gene Assay in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.乳腺癌 21 基因检测的成本效益分析:系统评价与关键评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;36(16):1619-1627. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.5941. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
6
20-Year Risks of Breast-Cancer Recurrence after Stopping Endocrine Therapy at 5 Years.内分泌治疗5年后停药的乳腺癌20年复发风险
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1836-1846. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701830.
7
Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state.乳腺癌统计数据,2017 年,按州划分的死亡率种族差异。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Nov;67(6):439-448. doi: 10.3322/caac.21412. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
8
Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update.使用生物标志物指导早期浸润性乳腺癌女性辅助全身治疗决策:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南重点更新
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 20;35(24):2838-2847. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.0472. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
9
An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation.一种经过更新且具有独立验证的PREDICT乳腺癌预后及治疗获益预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 May 22;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0852-3.
10
11 years' follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial.HER2阳性早期乳腺癌辅助化疗后曲妥珠单抗的11年随访:HERceptin辅助治疗(HERA)试验的最终分析
Lancet. 2017 Mar 25;389(10075):1195-1205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32616-2. Epub 2017 Feb 17.