• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估视频决策辅助工具对减少医生在生命维持治疗(POLST)决策中的决策冲突的影响。

Evaluation of a Video Decision Aid to Reduce Decisional Conflict in Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Decision-Making.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, 5631West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Department of Medicine, 24041West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Care. 2020 Oct;35(4):243-247. doi: 10.1177/0825859720923437. Epub 2020 May 6.

DOI:10.1177/0825859720923437
PMID:32372687
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7720244/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) is recommended as a preferred practice for advance care planning with seriously ill patients. Decision aids can assist patients in advance care planning, but there are limited studies on their use for POLST decisions. We hypothesized that after viewing a POLST video, decision aid participants would demonstrate increased knowledge and satisfaction and decreased decisional conflict.

DESIGN

Pre-and postintervention with no control group.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Fifty community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older asked to complete a POLST based on a hypothetical condition.

INTERVENTIONS

Video decision aid for Sections A and B of the POLST form.

MEASUREMENTS

Pre- and postintervention participant knowledge, decisional satisfaction, decisional conflict, and acceptability of video decision aid.

RESULTS

Use of the video decision aid increased knowledge scores from 11.24 ± 2.77 to 14.32 ± 2.89, < .001, improved decisional satisfaction 10.14 ± 3.73 to 8.70 ± 3.00, = .001, and decreased decisional conflict 12 ± 9.42 to 8.15 ± 9.13, < .001. All participants reported that they were comfortable using the video decision aid, that they would recommend it to others, and that it clarified POLST decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants endorsed the use of a POLST video decision aid, which increased their knowledge of POLST form options and satisfaction with their decisions, and decreased their decisional conflict in POLST completion. This pilot study provides preliminary support for the use of video decision aids for POLST decision-making. Future research should evaluate a decision aid for the entire POLST form and identify patient preferences for implementing POLST decision aids into clinical practice.

摘要

背景/目的:医师实施的维持生命治疗医嘱(POLST)被推荐作为与重病患者进行预先护理计划的首选实践。决策辅助工具可以帮助患者进行预先护理计划,但关于其在 POLST 决策中的使用的研究有限。我们假设,在观看 POLST 视频后,决策辅助工具的参与者将表现出更高的知识和满意度,以及更低的决策冲突。

设计

前后干预,无对照组。

地点/参与者:50 名居住在社区的 65 岁及以上的成年人,根据假设情况被要求完成 POLST。

干预措施

POLST 表格 A 和 B 部分的视频决策辅助工具。

测量

干预前后参与者的知识、决策满意度、决策冲突和对视频决策辅助工具的可接受性。

结果

使用视频决策辅助工具使知识得分从 11.24 ± 2.77 提高到 14.32 ± 2.89, <.001,提高决策满意度 10.14 ± 3.73 到 8.70 ± 3.00, =.001,降低决策冲突 12 ± 9.42 到 8.15 ± 9.13, <.001。所有参与者都表示他们使用视频决策辅助工具感到舒适,他们会向他人推荐,并认为它澄清了 POLST 决策。

结论

参与者认可使用 POLST 视频决策辅助工具,这提高了他们对 POLST 表格选项的了解和对决策的满意度,并降低了他们在完成 POLST 时的决策冲突。这项试点研究为使用视频决策辅助工具进行 POLST 决策提供了初步支持。未来的研究应该评估整个 POLST 表格的决策辅助工具,并确定患者对将 POLST 决策辅助工具纳入临床实践的偏好。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Video Decision Aid to Reduce Decisional Conflict in Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Decision-Making.评估视频决策辅助工具对减少医生在生命维持治疗(POLST)决策中的决策冲突的影响。
J Palliat Care. 2020 Oct;35(4):243-247. doi: 10.1177/0825859720923437. Epub 2020 May 6.
2
Patient-physician conversations about life-sustaining treatment: Treatment preferences and participant assessments.医患关于维持生命治疗的对话:治疗偏好与参与者评估。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Feb;21(1):20-26. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521001875.
3
POLST recall, concordance, and decision quality outcomes among nursing home residents and surrogate decision-makers.疗养院居民和代理人决策质量的 POLST 召回、一致性和结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2271-2278. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18330. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
4
To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?医生对维持生命治疗的医嘱(POLST)在多大程度上反映了患者在生命末期的护理偏好?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):334-339.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
5
High satisfaction and low decisional conflict with advance care planning among chronically ill patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure using an online decision aid: A pilot study.使用在线决策辅助工具对晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病或心力衰竭慢性病患者进行预先护理计划的高满意度和低决策冲突:一项试点研究。
Chronic Illn. 2016 Sep;12(3):227-35. doi: 10.1177/1742395316633511. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
6
A Tool to Assess Patient and Surrogate Knowledge About the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) Program.用于评估患者和代理人对 POLST(维持生命治疗医师指令)计划了解程度的工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jun;57(6):1143-1150.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
7
Discussing patient preferences for levels of life-sustaining treatment: development and pilot testing of a Danish POLST form.探讨患者对维持生命治疗水平的偏好:丹麦 POLST 表单的制定和初步测试。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jan 11;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00892-2.
8
A Pilot Randomized Trial of an Advance Care Planning Video Decision Support Tool for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer.一项针对晚期癌症青少年和年轻成人的预先医疗照护计划视频决策支持工具的初步随机试验。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Jul;21(7):715-723.e17. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7021.
9
POLST Facilitation in Complex Care Management: A Feasibility Study.复杂护理管理中的POLST促进:一项可行性研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Jan;36(1):5-12. doi: 10.1177/1049909118797077. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
10
Reasons for discordance and concordance between POLST orders and current treatment preferences.POLST 指令与当前治疗意愿之间存在差异和一致性的原因。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jul;69(7):1933-1940. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17097. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision experiences in joint replacement surgery for patients with haemophilic arthritis: A qualitative study.血友病性关节炎患者关节置换手术中的决策体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02901-3.
2
Shared Decision-making in Palliative and End-of-life Care in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.心脏重症监护病房姑息治疗和临终关怀中的共同决策
US Cardiol. 2024 Sep 4;18:e13. doi: 10.15420/usc.2024.03. eCollection 2024.
3
Navigating end-of-life decision-making in nursing: a systematic review of ethical challenges and palliative care practices.

本文引用的文献

1
Realizing Shared Decision-making in Practice.在实践中实现共同决策
JAMA. 2019 Sep 3;322(9):811-812. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9797.
2
Decisional Conflict Scale Use over 20 Years: The Anniversary Review.决策冲突量表使用 20 多年:周年回顾。
Med Decis Making. 2019 May;39(4):301-314. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19851345. Epub 2019 May 29.
3
Effect of the Goals of Care Intervention for Advanced Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.晚期痴呆症护理目标干预的效果:一项随机临床试验
护理中临终决策的引导:对伦理挑战与姑息治疗实践的系统评价
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 9;23(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02087-5.
4
Measuring decision aid effectiveness for end-of-life care: A systematic review.衡量临终关怀决策辅助工具的有效性:一项系统综述。
PEC Innov. 2024 Mar 13;4:100273. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100273. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
An Integrative Review of the State of POLST Science: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go?对POLST科学现状的综合综述:我们知道什么,又将何去何从?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Apr;25(4):557-564.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):24-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7031.
4
Video decision aids to assist with advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于辅助预先护理计划的视频决策辅助工具:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 24;5(6):e007491. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007491.
5
Measuring patient-centered care: An updated systematic review of how studies define and report concordance between patients' preferences and medical treatments.衡量以患者为中心的医疗服务:关于研究如何界定和报告患者偏好与医疗治疗之间一致性的最新系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jul;98(7):811-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
6
Use of the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program in the clinical setting: a systematic review of the literature.医生下达的维持生命治疗方案在临床环境中的应用:文献系统综述
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Feb;63(2):341-50. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13248. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
Minimum standards for the certification of patient decision support interventions: feasibility and application.患者决策支持干预措施认证的最低标准:可行性与应用
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Apr;98(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
8
Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments.确立患者决策辅助工具的有效性:关键构建和测量工具。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S12. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
10
Toward Minimum Standards for Certifying Patient Decision Aids: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process.迈向患者决策辅助工具认证的最低标准:一种改进的德尔菲共识过程。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):699-710. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13501721. Epub 2013 Aug 20.