• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Tool to Assess Patient and Surrogate Knowledge About the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) Program.用于评估患者和代理人对 POLST(维持生命治疗医师指令)计划了解程度的工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jun;57(6):1143-1150.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
2
Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment program in Oregon nursing facilities: beyond resuscitation status.俄勒冈州护理机构中医生下达的维持生命治疗医嘱项目的使用:超越复苏状态
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Sep;52(9):1424-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52402.x.
3
Nursing Home Residents' Preferences on Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment.养老院居民对维持生命治疗医嘱的偏好
Gerontologist. 2016 Aug;56(4):714-22. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv019. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
4
Do Life-sustaining Treatment Orders Match Patient and Surrogate Preferences? The Role of POLST.是否维持生命治疗令符合患者和代理人的偏好?POLST 的作用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):413-421. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06292-1. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
5
Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment among California Nursing Home Residents.加利福尼亚州疗养院居民使用医生下达的维持生命治疗医嘱的情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1119-26. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3728-9. Epub 2016 May 17.
6
Care preferences in physician orders for life sustaining treatment in California nursing homes.加利福尼亚养老院中维持生命治疗的医生医嘱中的护理偏好。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jul;70(7):2040-2050. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17737. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
7
Use of the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program in the clinical setting: a systematic review of the literature.医生下达的维持生命治疗方案在临床环境中的应用:文献系统综述
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Feb;63(2):341-50. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13248. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
8
A prospective study of the efficacy of the physician order form for life-sustaining treatment.一份关于维持生命治疗医嘱表格有效性的前瞻性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Sep;46(9):1097-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb06647.x.
9
Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment program for patients being discharged from the hospital to the nursing facility.针对从医院出院转至护理机构的患者使用医生下达的维持生命治疗计划。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;17(1):43-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0097. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
10
The Quality of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions: A Pilot Study.维持生命治疗决策的医生医嘱质量:一项试点研究。
J Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;20(2):155-162. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0059. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Planning Ahead: protocol for a randomised trial of advance care planning for community dwelling older adults at increased mortality risk.提前规划:针对社区居住的、死亡风险增加的老年人进行预先护理规划随机试验的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 24;15(5):e102186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102186.
2
An Integrative Review of the State of POLST Science: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go?对POLST科学现状的综合综述:我们知道什么,又将何去何从?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Apr;25(4):557-564.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
3
Do Socioeconomic Factors Influence Knowledge, Attitudes, and Representations of End-of-Life Practices? A Cross-Sectional Study.社会经济因素会影响临终实践的知识、态度和认知吗?一项横断面研究。
J Palliat Care. 2025 Apr;40(2):152-161. doi: 10.1177/08258597221131658. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
4
Factors associated with concordance between POLST orders and current treatment preferences.与 POLST 指令和当前治疗偏好一致性相关的因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jul;69(7):1865-1876. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17095. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: Early Implementation Results of a National Veterans Affairs Program to Honor Veterans' Care Preferences.维持生命治疗决策倡议:国家退伍军人事务部计划尊重退伍军人护理偏好的早期实施结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1803-1812. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05697-2. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
National Standards and State Variation in Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Forms.全国范围内和各州之间在维持生命治疗医嘱表单上的标准和变化。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jul;21(7):978-986. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0606. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
2
Use of the Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment Program in Indiana Nursing Homes.印第安纳州养老院中使用治疗范围医嘱程序。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul;66(6):1096-1100. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15338. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
3
Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care.预先医疗照护计划的定义和建议:欧洲缓和医疗协会支持的国际共识。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e543-e551. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X.
4
The Quality of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions: A Pilot Study.维持生命治疗决策的医生医嘱质量:一项试点研究。
J Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;20(2):155-162. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0059. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
5
Adult Age Differences in Dual Information Processes: Implications for the Role of Affective and Deliberative Processes in Older Adults' Decision Making.成人双信息加工的年龄差异:对情感和深思熟虑过程在老年人决策中的作用的影响。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;2(1):1-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00025.x.
6
Use of the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program in the clinical setting: a systematic review of the literature.医生下达的维持生命治疗方案在临床环境中的应用:文献系统综述
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Feb;63(2):341-50. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13248. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
Measuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer chemotherapy.测量决策质量:一种用于乳腺癌化疗的新工具的心理测量学评估
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Aug 20;14:73. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-73.
8
Racial and ethnic disparities in palliative care.在姑息治疗中存在种族和民族差异。
J Palliat Med. 2013 Nov;16(11):1329-34. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.9468. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
9
Validation of self-reported health literacy questions among diverse English and Spanish-speaking populations.不同英语和西班牙语人群中自我报告健康素养问题的验证。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Mar;26(3):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1552-1. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
10
How to define and measure concordance between patients' preferences and medical treatments: A systematic review of approaches and recommendations for standardization.如何定义和衡量患者偏好与医疗治疗之间的一致性:方法的系统评价及标准化建议。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jan;78(1):12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.011. Epub 2009 Jun 30.

用于评估患者和代理人对 POLST(维持生命治疗医师指令)计划了解程度的工具。

A Tool to Assess Patient and Surrogate Knowledge About the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) Program.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Nursing, Department of Community & Health Systems, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; IUPUI Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Signature Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

IUPUI Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Signature Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jun;57(6):1143-1150.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.030
PMID:30853552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6857935/
Abstract

CONTEXT

It is especially important that patients are well informed when making high-stakes, preference-sensitive decisions like those on the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form. However, there is currently no way to easily evaluate whether patients understand key concepts when making these important decisions.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a POLST knowledge survey.

METHODS

Expert (n = 62) ratings of key POLST facts were used to select items for a POLST knowledge survey. The survey was administered to nursing facility residents (n = 97) and surrogate decision-makers (n = 112). A subset (n = 135) were re-administered the survey after a standardized advance care planning discussion to assess the scale's responsiveness to change.

RESULTS

The 19-item survey demonstrated adequate reliability (α = 0.72.). Residents' scores (x = 11.4, standard deviation 3.3) were significantly lower than surrogate scores (x = 14.7, standard deviation 2.5) (P < 0.001). Scores for both groups increased significantly after administration of a standardized advance care planning discussion (P < 0.001). Although being a surrogate, age, race, education, cognitive functioning, and health literacy were significantly associated with higher POLST Knowledge Survey scores in univariate analyses, only being a surrogate (P < 0.001) and being white (P = 0.028) remained significantly associated with higher scores in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

The 19-item POLST Knowledge Survey demonstrated adequate reliability and responsiveness to change. Findings suggest the survey could be used to identify knowledge deficits and provide targeted education to ensure adequate understanding of key clinical decisions when completing POLST.

摘要

背景

当患者在做出高风险、偏好敏感的决策,如填写《医生指令延续生命治疗》(POLST)表单时,充分知情尤为重要。然而,目前尚无简便的方法来评估患者在做出这些重要决策时是否理解关键概念。

目的

开发一份 POLST 知识调查。

方法

利用专家(n=62)对 POLST 关键事实的评分来选择 POLST 知识调查的项目。该调查分发给护理院居民(n=97)和代理人决策人(n=112)。对一个亚组(n=135)在进行标准化的预先护理计划讨论后重新进行调查,以评估该量表对变化的反应能力。

结果

19 项调查显示出足够的可靠性(α=0.72)。居民的得分(x=11.4,标准差 3.3)明显低于代理人的得分(x=14.7,标准差 2.5)(P<0.001)。两组的得分在进行标准化的预先护理计划讨论后均显著增加(P<0.001)。虽然作为代理人,年龄、种族、教育程度、认知功能和健康素养在单变量分析中与更高的 POLST 知识调查得分显著相关,但只有作为代理人(P<0.001)和为白人(P=0.028)在多变量分析中与更高的得分显著相关。

结论

19 项的 POLST 知识调查显示出足够的可靠性和对变化的反应能力。研究结果表明,该调查可以用于识别知识缺陷,并提供针对性的教育,以确保在填写 POLST 时充分理解关键的临床决策。