Indiana University School of Nursing, Department of Community & Health Systems, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; IUPUI Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Signature Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
IUPUI Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Signature Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jun;57(6):1143-1150.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
It is especially important that patients are well informed when making high-stakes, preference-sensitive decisions like those on the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form. However, there is currently no way to easily evaluate whether patients understand key concepts when making these important decisions.
To develop a POLST knowledge survey.
Expert (n = 62) ratings of key POLST facts were used to select items for a POLST knowledge survey. The survey was administered to nursing facility residents (n = 97) and surrogate decision-makers (n = 112). A subset (n = 135) were re-administered the survey after a standardized advance care planning discussion to assess the scale's responsiveness to change.
The 19-item survey demonstrated adequate reliability (α = 0.72.). Residents' scores (x = 11.4, standard deviation 3.3) were significantly lower than surrogate scores (x = 14.7, standard deviation 2.5) (P < 0.001). Scores for both groups increased significantly after administration of a standardized advance care planning discussion (P < 0.001). Although being a surrogate, age, race, education, cognitive functioning, and health literacy were significantly associated with higher POLST Knowledge Survey scores in univariate analyses, only being a surrogate (P < 0.001) and being white (P = 0.028) remained significantly associated with higher scores in multivariate analyses.
The 19-item POLST Knowledge Survey demonstrated adequate reliability and responsiveness to change. Findings suggest the survey could be used to identify knowledge deficits and provide targeted education to ensure adequate understanding of key clinical decisions when completing POLST.
当患者在做出高风险、偏好敏感的决策,如填写《医生指令延续生命治疗》(POLST)表单时,充分知情尤为重要。然而,目前尚无简便的方法来评估患者在做出这些重要决策时是否理解关键概念。
开发一份 POLST 知识调查。
利用专家(n=62)对 POLST 关键事实的评分来选择 POLST 知识调查的项目。该调查分发给护理院居民(n=97)和代理人决策人(n=112)。对一个亚组(n=135)在进行标准化的预先护理计划讨论后重新进行调查,以评估该量表对变化的反应能力。
19 项调查显示出足够的可靠性(α=0.72)。居民的得分(x=11.4,标准差 3.3)明显低于代理人的得分(x=14.7,标准差 2.5)(P<0.001)。两组的得分在进行标准化的预先护理计划讨论后均显著增加(P<0.001)。虽然作为代理人,年龄、种族、教育程度、认知功能和健康素养在单变量分析中与更高的 POLST 知识调查得分显著相关,但只有作为代理人(P<0.001)和为白人(P=0.028)在多变量分析中与更高的得分显著相关。
19 项的 POLST 知识调查显示出足够的可靠性和对变化的反应能力。研究结果表明,该调查可以用于识别知识缺陷,并提供针对性的教育,以确保在填写 POLST 时充分理解关键的临床决策。