Richter Anne, Vander Elst Tinne, De Witte Hans
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 16;11:712. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00712. eCollection 2020.
Job insecurity is a work stressor with many negative consequences for the individual as well as the organization. However, currently, little is known about why job insecurity is related to these outcomes. In the present study, actual turnover was investigated as a possible consequence of job insecurity. Additionally, rumination about a possible job loss (i.e., the act of intensified thinking about the future of the job) was investigated as an explanatory mechanism. Relationships were tested using longitudinal data from a sample of 699 Belgian employees. Results of structural equation modeling analyses show that job insecurity was related to turnover 1 year later. This relationship was mediated by rumination about job insecurity. Actual turnover was investigated over time as a potential consequence of job insecurity, compared to many studies that used turnover intention as a proxy to predict actual turnover. Moreover, a job insecurity-specific mechanism-namely, rumination about job insecurity-was studied, which increased our understanding of how job insecurity develops into its consequences.
工作不安全感是一种工作压力源,对个人和组织都会产生许多负面后果。然而,目前对于工作不安全感为何与这些结果相关却知之甚少。在本研究中,将实际离职率作为工作不安全感可能产生的后果进行了调查。此外,还对关于可能失业的反复思考(即对工作未来进行强化思考的行为)作为一种解释机制进行了调查。使用来自699名比利时员工样本的纵向数据对各种关系进行了检验。结构方程模型分析结果表明,工作不安全感与一年后的离职率相关。这种关系由对工作不安全感的反复思考介导。随着时间的推移,将实际离职率作为工作不安全感的潜在后果进行了调查,而许多研究使用离职意向作为预测实际离职率的替代指标。此外,还研究了一种特定于工作不安全感的机制,即对工作不安全感的反复思考,这增进了我们对工作不安全感如何演变成其后果的理解。