Faust Lena, Ruhwald Morten, Schumacher Samuel, Pai Madhukar
McGill International TB Centre Montreal General Hospital Montreal Quebec Canada.
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health McGill University Montreal Qubec Canada.
Health Sci Rep. 2020 May 3;3(2):e158. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.158. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Despite the World Health Organization (WHO)'s updated guidelines on tuberculosis (TB) preventive treatment, the scale-up of TB preventive therapy remains low in many high-burden countries (HBCs). We conducted a survey to better understand the current status of policy implementation and barriers for scale-up.
Survey questions pertained to HBCs' current latent TB infection (LTBI) screening and treatment strategies, and the availability of LTBI tests and newer treatments (eg, isoniazid/rifapentine [3HP]). The 19-question survey was piloted and sent out via email in June 2019 as a protected Microsoft Word document to contacts [National TB Program (NTP) staff, researchers, and health officials] in the 30 TB HBCs. Responses were accepted until February 2020.
Thirty-seven completed surveys from 24 HBCs were received. Respondents from five countries (Brazil, Lesotho, Mozambique, Russia, Zambia) reported having LTBI guidelines that are fully implemented. Among respondents who indicated their country currently has no LTBI guideline implementation (Angola, China, DRC, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Myanmar), the most often cited barrier to implementation was the prioritization of active TB over LTBI management (n = 5, Angola, China, DRC, India, Kenya). Of the 16 countries in which respondents reported using purified protein derivative (PPD), 9 reported having experienced a PPD shortage within the past year (from time of survey). Respondents from six countries reported currently using Interferon-gamma Release Assays (IGRAs) in their NTP, and 13 cited high cost as a barrier to IGRA use. Lastly, rifapentine was stated not be available in 8 HBCs.
This survey indicates limited implementation of WHO LTBI guidelines in HBCs and provides some insight into barriers to implementation, including shortage of products (eg, PPD), high costs (eg, IGRAs), and lack of regulatory approval of newer treatments (eg, rifapentine). Thus, we should work towards price reductions for LTBI tests and treatments, and the development of tests that can be more easily implemented at peripheral healthcare levels.
尽管世界卫生组织(WHO)更新了结核病(TB)预防性治疗指南,但在许多高负担国家(HBCs),结核病预防性治疗的推广规模仍然较低。我们开展了一项调查,以更好地了解政策实施的现状以及推广的障碍。
调查问题涉及高负担国家当前的潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)筛查和治疗策略,以及LTBI检测和新型治疗方法(如异烟肼/利福喷汀[3HP])的可及性。这份包含19个问题的调查问卷于2019年6月进行了预试验,并作为受保护的Microsoft Word文档通过电子邮件发送给30个结核病高负担国家的联系人[国家结核病规划(NTP)工作人员、研究人员和卫生官员]。截至2020年2月接受回复。
共收到来自24个高负担国家的37份完整调查问卷。来自五个国家(巴西、莱索托、莫桑比克、俄罗斯、赞比亚)的受访者报告称,其LTBI指南已得到全面实施。在表示本国目前未实施LTBI指南的受访者中(安哥拉、中国、刚果民主共和国、印度、印度尼西亚、肯尼亚、缅甸),最常被提及的实施障碍是将活动性结核病置于LTBI管理之上的优先排序(n = 5,安哥拉、中国、刚果民主共和国、印度、肯尼亚)。在16个受访者报告使用纯蛋白衍生物(PPD)的国家中,9个报告在过去一年(自调查时起)经历过PPD短缺。来自六个国家的受访者报告其国家结核病规划目前正在使用干扰素-γ释放试验(IGRAs),13个国家将高成本列为使用IGRAs的障碍。最后,8个高负担国家表示没有利福喷汀。
本次调查表明,WHO的LTBI指南在高负担国家的实施有限,并提供了一些关于实施障碍的见解,包括产品短缺(如PPD)、高成本(如IGRAs)以及新型治疗方法(如利福喷汀)缺乏监管批准。因此,我们应努力降低LTBI检测和治疗的价格,并开发能够更易于在外围医疗层面实施的检测方法。