Lu Di, Wang Te, Hong Jian-Jun, Chen Hua, Sun Liao-Jun
Acta Orthop Belg. 2019 Dec;85(4):406-411.
The purpose of this study was to compare prospecti- vely the radiographic and clinical results of patients treated with tightrope through either mini-open or percutaneous stabilization for acute AC joint injuries. Eighty patients were included in this study and were randomly divided into two groups. Group A included 40 injuries treated with mini-open repair. Group B consisted of 40 injuries treated with percutaneous stabilization. Demographic and clinical data were comparable between the two groups before surgery (P>0.05). Peri-operative data, complications and clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared. The average follow-up time of Group A, was 26.5±4.3 months and Group B, was 25.2±5.6 months (P>0.05). The mean operative time was 63.2±9.6 minutes and 45.6±7.1 minutes, and the mean incision length was 6.0±1.5 cm and 4.0±0.8 cm, respectively. The operative time and incision length were significantly longer in Group A (both P<0.05). However, the radiological assessment revealed no significant difference in the coracoclavicular (CC) distance between the two groups (P>0.05). The rate of loss of reduction in the Group A was similar to that in Group B (6/40 vs. 5/40, P>0.05). Both methods were efficient methods for acute AC joint dislocation. However, percutaneous fixation had the advantages of a shorter surgical time and smaller incision length.
本研究的目的是前瞻性比较采用微型开放或经皮稳定技术使用Tightrope治疗急性肩锁关节损伤患者的影像学和临床结果。本研究纳入了80例患者,并将其随机分为两组。A组包括40例采用微型开放修复治疗的损伤。B组由40例采用经皮稳定技术治疗的损伤组成。两组术前的人口统计学和临床数据具有可比性(P>0.05)。比较了两组的围手术期数据、并发症和临床结果。A组的平均随访时间为26.5±4.3个月,B组为25.2±5.6个月(P>0.05)。平均手术时间分别为63.2±9.6分钟和45.6±7.1分钟,平均切口长度分别为6.0±1.5厘米和4.0±0.8厘米。A组的手术时间和切口长度明显更长(均P<0.05)。然而,影像学评估显示两组之间的喙锁(CC)距离无显著差异(P>0.05)。A组复位丢失率与B组相似(6/40对5/40,P>0.05)。两种方法都是治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的有效方法。然而,经皮固定具有手术时间短和切口长度小的优点。