Suppr超能文献

诱导化疗联合同期放化疗与单纯同期放化疗治疗鼻咽癌患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.

Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200438, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2020 May 6;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06912-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been recommended as the first-line therapy for locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Due to the different chemotherapeutic drugs used in the IC and CCRT, the results remain controversial.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically retrieved to search potentially eligible clinical trials up to Sep 11, 2019. Eligible studies were registered and prospective randomized controlled clinical trials.

RESULTS

From 526 records, nine articles including seven randomized controlled clinical trials were eligible, with a total of 2311 locoregional advanced NPC patients. IC + CCRT had significantly lower risks of death (3-year hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.89, p = 0.003; 5-year HR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.94, p = 0.01), disease progression (3-year HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.80, p < 0.001; 5-year HR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.83, p < 0.0001), distant metastasis (3-year HR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.74, p < 0.0001; 5-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.87, p = 0.001) and locoregional relapse (3-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95, p = 0.02; 5-year HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.86, p = 0.002) than CCRT. Compared with CCRT, IC + CCRT showed higher relative risks of grade 3 or more neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting and hepatotoxicity throughout the course of treatment, and higher relative risks of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia and vomiting during CCRT.

CONCLUSION

IC combined with CCRT significantly improved the survival in locoregional advanced NPC patients. Moreover, toxicities were well tolerated during IC and CCRT. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the optimal induction chemotherapeutic regimen in the future.

摘要

背景

诱导化疗(IC)联合同期放化疗(CCRT)已被推荐为局部区域鼻咽癌(NPC)的一线治疗方法。由于 IC 和 CCRT 中使用的化疗药物不同,结果仍存在争议。

方法

系统检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,以搜索截至 2019 年 9 月 11 日可能符合条件的临床研究。合格的研究为注册和前瞻性随机对照临床试验。

结果

从 526 条记录中,有 9 篇文章符合条件,包括 7 项随机对照临床试验,共有 2311 例局部晚期 NPC 患者。IC+CCRT 显著降低了死亡风险(3 年危险比 [HR]:0.70,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.55-0.89,p=0.003;5 年 HR:0.77,95%CI 0.62-0.94,p=0.01)、疾病进展(3 年 HR:0.67,95%CI 0.55-0.80,p<0.001;5 年 HR:0.70,95%CI 0.58-0.83,p<0.0001)、远处转移(3 年 HR:0.58,95%CI 0.45-0.74,p<0.0001;5 年 HR:0.69,95%CI 0.55-0.87,p=0.001)和局部区域复发(3 年 HR:0.69,95%CI 0.50-0.95,p=0.02;5 年 HR:0.66,95%CI 0.51-0.86,p=0.002)低于 CCRT。与 CCRT 相比,IC+CCRT 在整个治疗过程中显示出更高的 3 级或更高级别的中性粒细胞减少症、血小板减少症、恶心、呕吐和肝毒性的相对风险,并且在 CCRT 期间表现出更高的 3 级或更高级别的血小板减少症和呕吐的相对风险。

结论

IC 联合 CCRT 显著改善了局部晚期 NPC 患者的生存率。此外,IC 和 CCRT 期间的毒性反应可以耐受。需要进一步的临床试验来确定未来最佳的诱导化疗方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6978/7204295/cb3657c5f528/12885_2020_6912_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验