Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 18;17(3):e0265551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265551. eCollection 2022.
The major aim of this Bayesian network analysis was to determine the optimal treatment strategy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC).
We systematically searched databases and extracted data from randomized clinical trials involving LANPC patients randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC+CCRT), CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CCRT+AC), or CCRT.
In the network analysis, IC+CCRT was significantly better than CCRT alone for 5-year FFS (odds ratio [OR]: 1.63, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.16-2.29), DMFS (OR: 1.56, 95% CrI 1.08-2.22), and LFRS (OR: 1.62, 95% CrI 1.02-2.59), but not OS (OR: 1.35, 95% CrI 0.92-2.00). Rank probabilities showed that IC+CCRT was ranked the best followed by CCRT+AC and CCRT for all 5-year outcomes. Although compared to IC+CCRT and CCRT, CCRT+AC did not significantly improve survival but had the highest 5-year survival rates.
IC+CCRT could be recommended as a front-preferred primary definitive therapy for patients with LANPC.
本贝叶斯网络分析的主要目的是确定局部晚期鼻咽癌(LANPC)的最佳治疗策略。
我们系统地检索了数据库,并从涉及 LANPC 患者的随机临床试验中提取数据,这些患者被随机分配接受诱导化疗后同期放化疗(IC+CCRT)、CCRT 后辅助化疗(CCRT+AC)或 CCRT。
在网络分析中,IC+CCRT 与单独 CCRT 相比,5 年无失败生存率(FFS;优势比 [OR]:1.63,95%可信区间 [CrI] 1.16-2.29)、无远处转移生存率(DMFS;OR:1.56,95% CrI 1.08-2.22)和无局部复发生存率(LFRS;OR:1.62,95% CrI 1.02-2.59)显著更高,但总生存率(OS;OR:1.35,95% CrI 0.92-2.00)无显著差异。等级概率显示,IC+CCRT 是最佳选择,其次是 CCRT+AC 和 CCRT,所有 5 年结局均如此。尽管与 IC+CCRT 和 CCRT 相比,CCRT+AC 并未显著改善生存,但 5 年生存率最高。
IC+CCRT 可作为 LANPC 患者首选的一线根治性治疗方法。