Department of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Diagn Pathol. 2020 May 6;15(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13000-020-00964-6.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has been employed by several European countries to augment cytology-based cervical screening programs. A number of research groups have demonstrated potential utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for HPV genotyping, with comparable performance and broader detection spectrum than current gold standards. Nevertheless, most of these NGS platforms may not be the best choice for medium sample throughput and laboratories with less resources and space. In light of this, we developed a Nanopore sequencing assay for HPV genotyping and compared its performance with cobas HPV Test and Roche Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test (LA).
Two hundred and one cervicovaginal swabs were routinely tested for Papanicolaou smear, cobas HPV Test and LA. Residual DNA was used for Nanopore protocol after routine testing. Briefly, HPV L1 region was amplified using PGMY and MGP primers, and PCR-positive specimens were sequenced on MinION flow cells (R9.4.1). Data generated in first 2 h were aligned with reference sequences from Papillomavirus Episteme database for genotyping.
Nanopore detected 96 HPV-positive (47.76%) and 95 HPV-negative (47.26%) specimens, with 10 lacking β-globin band and not further analyzed (4.98%). Substantial agreement was achieved with cobas HPV Test and LA (κ: 0.83-0.93). In particular, Nanopore appeared to be more sensitive than cobas HPV Test for HPV 52 (n = 7). For LA, Nanopore revealed higher concordance for high-risk (κ: 0.93) than non-high risk types (κ: 0.83), and with similar high-risk positivity in each cytology grading. Nanopore also provided better resolution for HPV 52 in 3 specimens co-infected with HPV 33 or 58, and for HPV 87 which was identified as HPV 84 by LA. Interestingly, Nanopore identified 5 additional HPV types, with an unexpected high incidence of HPV 90 (n = 12) which was reported in North America and Belgium but not in Hong Kong.
We developed a Nanopore workflow for HPV genotyping which was economical (about USD 50.77 per patient specimen for 24-plex runs), and with comparable or better performance than 2 reference methods in the market. Future prospective study with larger sample size is warranted to further evaluate test performance and streamline the protocol.
人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测已被一些欧洲国家用于增强基于细胞学的宫颈癌筛查计划。许多研究小组已经证明了下一代测序(NGS)在 HPV 基因分型方面的潜在效用,其性能与当前的金标准相当,检测范围更广。然而,这些 NGS 平台中的大多数可能不是中等样本通量和资源较少的实验室的最佳选择。有鉴于此,我们开发了一种用于 HPV 基因分型的 Nanopore 测序检测方法,并将其与 cobas HPV Test 和 Roche Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test(LA)进行了比较。
对 201 例宫颈阴道拭子进行巴氏涂片常规检测、cobas HPV Test 和 LA。常规检测后,使用剩余 DNA 进行 Nanopore 方案检测。简要地说,使用 PGMY 和 MGP 引物扩增 HPV L1 区,然后对 PCR 阳性标本在 MinION 流动池(R9.4.1)上进行测序。在头 2 小时生成的数据与 Papillomavirus Episteme 数据库中的参考序列进行比对,以进行基因分型。
Nanopore 检测到 96 例 HPV 阳性(47.76%)和 95 例 HPV 阴性(47.26%)标本,其中 10 例因缺乏β-珠蛋白带而未进一步分析(4.98%)。与 cobas HPV Test 和 LA 有显著一致性(κ:0.83-0.93)。特别是,Nanopore 对 HPV 52 的检测灵敏度似乎高于 cobas HPV Test(n=7)。对于 LA,Nanopore 对高危型 HPV 的一致性更高(κ:0.93),而非高危型 HPV 的一致性略低(κ:0.83),且在每个细胞学分级中都具有相似的高危 HPV 阳性率。Nanopore 还为 3 例同时感染 HPV 33 或 58 的标本中的 HPV 52 提供了更好的分辨率,并且对 LA 鉴定为 HPV 84 的 HPV 87 也提供了更好的分辨率。有趣的是,Nanopore 还鉴定了另外 5 种 HPV 类型,其中 HPV 90 的发病率出乎意料地高(n=12),这在北美和比利时有报道,但在香港没有报道。
我们开发了一种用于 HPV 基因分型的 Nanopore 工作流程,该流程经济实惠(每个患者标本的费用约为 50.77 美元,可进行 24 重检测),与市场上的两种参考方法相比具有相当或更好的性能。需要进行更大样本量的前瞻性研究,以进一步评估测试性能并简化方案。