Rana Rezwanul Hasan, Alam Khorshed, Gow Jeff
School of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
School of Commerce, Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 6;20(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05253-y.
This study aimed to examine the healthcare-seeking (hospital, primary and preventive care) and healthcare utilisation behaviour of patients with private health insurance (PHI) in Australia. It also aimed to examine the socioeconomic, demographic and lifestyle factors that influence the choice of hospital care in Australia.
A logistic regression model with repeated measure t-test and Pearson's Chi-square test were used to identify the factors that affect the choice of care. Data from waves 9 (2009) and 13 (2013) of the nationally-representative Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey were used in the analysis.
Patients with PHI had a higher number of hospital nights' stay despite having a lower number of hospital admissions than those without private cover. Significant disparities were identified in preventive and specialist care use between patients with cover and without cover. No significant variations were observed in healthcare utilisation for PHI patients before and after dropping PHI. One in four patients chose to use public hospitals despite holding PHI cover. Moreover, those insured and from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and those who were younger and without long-term health conditions showed a higher probability of selecting public rather than private care.
It is evident that PHI cover encourages people to use private care. However, a considerable number of PHI patients are using public care, even though eligible for private care may indicate consumer information asymmetry.
本研究旨在调查澳大利亚拥有私人医疗保险(PHI)的患者寻求医疗服务(医院、初级和预防保健)及利用医疗服务的行为。它还旨在研究影响澳大利亚医院护理选择的社会经济、人口统计学和生活方式因素。
采用带有重复测量t检验和Pearson卡方检验的逻辑回归模型来确定影响护理选择的因素。分析中使用了具有全国代表性的澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态(HILDA)调查第9波(2009年)和第13波(2013年)的数据。
尽管拥有PHI的患者住院次数少于没有私人保险的患者,但他们的住院天数更多。在有保险和无保险的患者之间,预防保健和专科护理的使用存在显著差异。对于拥有PHI的患者,放弃PHI前后的医疗服务利用情况没有观察到显著变化。四分之一的患者尽管拥有PHI保险,却选择使用公立医院。此外,那些有保险且社会经济背景较低、年龄较小且没有长期健康问题的人选择公立而非私立护理的可能性更高。
显然,PHI保险鼓励人们使用私立医疗服务。然而,相当数量的PHI患者正在使用公立医疗服务,尽管有资格使用私立医疗服务可能表明存在消费者信息不对称。