• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤侵犯导致的背侧神经性疼痛患者的冷冻神经松解术。

Cryoneurolysis in Patients with Dorsal Neuropathic Pain Secondary to Tumor Invasion.

机构信息

Interventional Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 promenade Bullukian, 69008 Lyon, France.

CREATIS, UMR CNRS (Unités Mixtes de Recherche Centre National de Recherche Scientifique) 5220 - INSERM 1206, Lyon, France.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):917-924. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 May 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2020.01.018
PMID:32376175
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoneurolysis (CNL) in patients with refractory thoracic neuropathic pain related to tumor invasion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2013 and May 2017, this single-center and retrospective study reviewed 27 computed tomography-guided CNLs performed on 26 patients for refractory thoracic neuropathic pain related to tumor invasion. Patients with cognitive impairment were excluded. Pain levels were recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS) before the procedure, on days 1, 7, 14, 28 and at each subsequent follow-up appointment. CNL was clinically successful if the postprocedural VAS decreased by 3 points or more. To determine the duration of clinical success, the end of pain relief was defined as either an increased VAS of 2 or more points, the introduction of a new analgesic treatment, a death with controlled pain, or for lost to follow-up patients, the latest follow-up appointment date with controlled pain.

RESULTS

Technical success rate was 96.7% and clinical success rate was 100%. Mean preprocedural pain score was 6.4 ± 1.7 and decreased to 2.4 ± 2.4 at day 1; 1.8 ± 1.7 at day 7 (P < .001); 3.3 ± 2.5 at day 14; 3.4 ± 2.6 at day 28 (P < .05). The median duration of pain relief was 45 days (range 14-70). Two minor complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryoneurolysis is a safe procedure that significantly decreased pain scores in patients with thoracic neuropathic pain related to tumor invasion, with a median duration of clinical success of 45 days.

摘要

目的

评估冷冻神经松解术(CNL)治疗肿瘤侵犯相关难治性胸神经病理性疼痛的安全性和有效性。

材料和方法

2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 5 月,这项单中心回顾性研究共纳入 26 例因肿瘤侵犯导致难治性胸神经病理性疼痛而行 27 例 CT 引导下 CNL 的患者。排除认知障碍患者。在术前、术后第 1、7、14、28 天和每次后续随访时,使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)记录疼痛程度。如果术后 VAS 下降 3 分或更多,则认为 CNL 临床成功。为确定临床成功的持续时间,疼痛缓解结束定义为 VAS 增加 2 分或更多、引入新的镇痛治疗、疼痛控制下死亡,或对于失访患者,疼痛控制下的最后一次随访日期。

结果

技术成功率为 96.7%,临床成功率为 100%。术前平均疼痛评分(VAS)为 6.4±1.7,术后第 1 天降至 2.4±2.4;第 7 天降至 1.8±1.7(P<.001);第 14 天降至 3.3±2.5;第 28 天降至 3.4±2.6(P<.05)。疼痛缓解的中位持续时间为 45 天(范围 14-70 天)。发生 2 例轻微并发症。

结论

冷冻神经松解术是一种安全的治疗方法,可显著降低肿瘤侵犯相关胸神经病理性疼痛患者的疼痛评分,中位临床成功持续时间为 45 天。

相似文献

1
Cryoneurolysis in Patients with Dorsal Neuropathic Pain Secondary to Tumor Invasion.肿瘤侵犯导致的背侧神经性疼痛患者的冷冻神经松解术。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):917-924. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 May 4.
2
Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneously Controlled Ablation of the Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Due to Thoracic Neuropathic Pain.计算机断层扫描引导下经皮胸椎旁神经控温热消融术治疗胸神经病性疼痛。
Pain Pract. 2017 Jul;17(6):792-799. doi: 10.1111/papr.12527. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
3
Cryoneurolysis in Patients with Refractory Chronic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.冷冻神经lysis治疗难治性慢性周围神经性疼痛患者。(注:“lysis”可能是特定医学术语,这里保留英文未翻译完整,需结合具体医学语境准确翻译)
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Feb;27(2):239-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.11.027. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
4
Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coblation of the Thoracic Nerve Root for Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia.计算机断层扫描引导下经皮射频消融胸神经根治疗带状疱疹后神经痛。
Pain Physician. 2020 Sep;23(5):E487-E496.
5
Cryoablation for the treatment of occipital neuralgia.冷冻消融术治疗枕神经痛
Pain Physician. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):E363-8.
6
Interventional Cryoneurolysis: An Illustrative Approach.介入冷冻神经松解术:一种图示方法。
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Dec;23(4):100698. doi: 10.1016/j.tvir.2020.100698. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation for the Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain in Amputees: A Pilot Study.经皮影像引导下冷冻消融治疗截肢患者幻肢痛:一项初步研究。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Jan;28(1):24-34.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
8
Usefulness of screening tools in the evaluation of long-term effectiveness of DREZ lesioning in the treatment of neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury.筛查工具在评估脊髓背根入髓区毁损术治疗臂丛神经损伤后神经性疼痛长期疗效中的作用
BMC Neurol. 2014 Dec 9;14:225. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0225-9.
9
Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoneurolysis.经皮影像引导下的冷冻神经松解术。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):454-465. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18452. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
Ultrasound-Guided Microwave Ablation for the Management of Inguinal Neuralgia: A Preliminary Study with 1-Year Follow-up.超声引导下微波消融治疗腹股沟神经痛:一项为期1年随访的初步研究
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Feb;30(2):242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.10.031.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-acute sequelae SARS-CoV-2 infection and neuropathic pain: a narrative review of the literature and future directions.新型冠状病毒感染的急性后遗症与神经性疼痛:文献综述及未来方向
Pain Manag. 2025 Jun;15(6):333-343. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2501521. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
Cryoneurolysis: A Comprehensive Review of Applications in Pain Management.冷冻神经lysis:疼痛管理应用的全面综述。 (注:这里“lysis”可能是特定医学术语,未查到准确对应中文,直接保留英文更准确,可根据具体医学背景确定准确中文表述)
Cureus. 2025 Feb 22;17(2):e79448. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79448. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Minimally invasive interventional therapy for pain.
疼痛的微创介入治疗
J Interv Med. 2023 Mar 7;6(2):64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jimed.2023.03.003. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Intercostal Cryoneurolysis.肋间冷冻神经消融术
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2022 Jun 30;39(2):167-171. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1745763. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Efficacy of intercostal cryoneurolysis as an analgesic adjunct for chest wall pain after surgery or trauma: systematic review.肋间冷冻神经lysis作为手术或创伤后胸壁疼痛镇痛辅助手段的疗效:系统评价
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 May 18;6(1):e000690. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000690. eCollection 2021.