• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筛查工具在评估脊髓背根入髓区毁损术治疗臂丛神经损伤后神经性疼痛长期疗效中的作用

Usefulness of screening tools in the evaluation of long-term effectiveness of DREZ lesioning in the treatment of neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury.

作者信息

Haninec Pavel, Kaiser Radek, Mencl Libor, Waldauf Petr

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50 100 34, Prague, Czech Republic.

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2014 Dec 9;14:225. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0225-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12883-014-0225-9
PMID:25487537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4264322/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite high success rate of DREZ lesioning in the treatment of intractable central pain, there is still a significant incidence of patients without satisfactory post-operative effect. The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term effect of DREZ lesioning using both a subjective assessment using a visual analog scale (VAS) to quantify residual pain and an assessment using the screening tool (painDETECT Questionnaire, PD-Q).

METHODS

DREZ lesioning was performed in 52 patients from a total 441 cases with brachial plexus injury (11.8%) during a 17-year period (1995-2011). The effect of surgery was retrospectively assessed in 48 patients.

RESULTS

A decrease in pre-operative pain by more than 75% (Group I) was achieved in 70.8% of patients and another 20.8% reported significant improvement (Group II). The surgery was unsucessful in 8.4% (Group III). We found a significant correlation between 'improvement' groups from both methods of assessments. Patients from Group I usually complained of residual nociceptive pain according to PD-Q, patients from Group II typically had pain of unclear origin, and all cases those in Group III suffered from neuropathic pain, Cramer's V = .66, P < .001. Overall, 66.7% of patients had resolved neuropathic pain, 20.8% patients had more serious complaints and may also suffer from residual neuropathic pain, while 12.5% had unresolved neuropathic pain.

CONCLUSION

DREZ lesioning is a safe and effective method with success rates of about 90%. PD-Q scores correspond to subjective satisfaction with the surgery and it seems to be a suitable screening tool for finding patients with residual neuropathic pain after surgery.

摘要

背景

尽管脊髓背根入髓区(DREZ)毁损术治疗顽固性中枢性疼痛的成功率很高,但仍有相当一部分患者术后效果不理想。本研究旨在通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行主观评估以量化残余疼痛,并使用筛查工具(疼痛DETECT问卷,PD-Q)进行评估,从而评价DREZ毁损术的长期效果。

方法

在17年期间(1995 - 2011年),对441例臂丛神经损伤患者中的52例(11.8%)实施了DREZ毁损术。对48例患者的手术效果进行了回顾性评估。

结果

70.8%的患者术前疼痛减轻超过75%(I组),另有20.8%的患者报告有显著改善(II组)。手术失败率为8.4%(III组)。我们发现两种评估方法的“改善”组之间存在显著相关性。根据PD-Q,I组患者通常抱怨有残余伤害性疼痛,II组患者典型地有不明来源的疼痛,而III组所有病例都患有神经性疼痛,克莱默V值 = 0.66,P < 0.001。总体而言,66.7%的患者神经性疼痛得到缓解,20.8%的患者有更严重的主诉且可能也患有残余神经性疼痛,而12.5%的患者神经性疼痛未得到缓解。

结论

DREZ毁损术是一种安全有效的方法,成功率约为90%。PD-Q评分与对手术的主观满意度相对应,它似乎是一种适合筛查术后有残余神经性疼痛患者的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9fe/4264322/f3a02b687f26/12883_2014_225_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9fe/4264322/f3a02b687f26/12883_2014_225_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9fe/4264322/f3a02b687f26/12883_2014_225_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Usefulness of screening tools in the evaluation of long-term effectiveness of DREZ lesioning in the treatment of neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury.筛查工具在评估脊髓背根入髓区毁损术治疗臂丛神经损伤后神经性疼痛长期疗效中的作用
BMC Neurol. 2014 Dec 9;14:225. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0225-9.
2
Correlation of preoperative MRI with the long-term outcomes of dorsal root entry zone lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain.术前磁共振成像与臂丛神经撕脱伤疼痛的背根入髓区毁损术长期疗效的相关性
J Neurosurg. 2016 May;124(5):1470-8. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.JNS142572. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
3
Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for the Treatment of Pain After Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injury: 2-Dimensional Operative Video and Technical Report.经皮脊神经根入区切断术治疗臂丛神经撕脱伤后疼痛:二维手术视频及技术报告。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2022 Jun 1;22(6):e252-e258. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000149. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
4
Modified dorsal root entry zone lesioning for intractable pain relief in patients with root avulsion injury.改良背根入髓区毁损术用于神经根撕脱伤患者的顽固性疼痛缓解
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Aug;27(2):178-184. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.SPINE16234. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
5
Spinal and Nucleus Caudalis Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for Chronic Pain: Efficacy and Outcomes.脊髓与尾状核背根入髓区损伤治疗慢性疼痛:疗效与结果
World Neurosurg. 2015 Aug;84(2):494-504. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.025. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
6
Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning Following Unresponsive Spinal Cord Stimulation for Post-Traumatic Neuropathic Pain.脊髓刺激治疗创伤后神经病理性疼痛无效后行背根入区损毁术。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Oct;178:e300-e306. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.048. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
7
The Safety and Efficacy of Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for Pain Management in Patients With Brachial Plexus Avulsion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮脊柱神经根入区切断术治疗臂丛神经撕脱伤患者疼痛的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurgery. 2024 Aug 1;95(2):259-274. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002906. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
8
Dorsal root entry zone lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion - technical evolution and long-term follow-up.臂丛神经撕脱伤的背根入髓区毁损术——技术进展与长期随访
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 May 30;166(1):241. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06132-9.
9
Dorsal Root Entry Zone (DREZ) Lesioning for Brachial Neuralgia.背根入区(DREZ)切断术治疗臂丛神经痛。
Neurol India. 2020 Sep-Oct;68(5):1012-1015. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.299139.
10
Changes in spontaneous dorsal horn potentials after dorsal root entry zone lesioning in patients with pain after brachial plexus avulsion.臂丛神经撕脱伤后疼痛患者背根入髓区损伤后背角自发电位的变化
J Int Med Res. 2012;40(4):1499-506. doi: 10.1177/147323001204000429.

引用本文的文献

1
Dorsal root entry zone lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain: a case series.背根入区切断术治疗臂丛神经撕脱伤后疼痛:病例系列研究。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2023 Mar 9;9(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41394-023-00564-8.
2
Dorsal root entry zone lesion: nuances of the technique and long-term results.背根入髓区损伤:技术细节与长期结果
Neurosurg Focus Video. 2020 Oct 1;3(2):V13. doi: 10.3171/2020.7.FOCVID2031. eCollection 2020 Oct.
3
Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injuries: Case Series and Literature Review.

本文引用的文献

1
The neuropathic component in persistent postsurgical pain: a systematic literature review.持续性手术后疼痛的神经病理性成分:系统文献回顾。
Pain. 2013 Jan;154(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.09.010.
2
Dorsal root entry zone lesioning for pain after brachial plexus avulsion: results with special emphasis on differential effects on the paroxysmal versus the continuous components. A prospective study in a 29-patient consecutive series.臂丛神经根撕脱伤后疼痛的背根入区切断术:特别强调对阵发性与持续性成分的不同影响的结果。29 例连续病例的前瞻性研究。
Pain. 2011 Aug;152(8):1923-1930. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.037. Epub 2011 May 5.
3
臂丛神经撕脱伤的背根入髓区损伤:病例系列与文献综述
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 17;2:749801. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.749801. eCollection 2021.
4
Current Understanding of the Involvement of the Insular Cortex in Neuropathic Pain: A Narrative Review.当前对岛叶皮层参与神经性疼痛的认识:叙事性综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 5;22(5):2648. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052648.
5
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on chronic pain in Spain: a scoping review.新冠疫情对西班牙慢性疼痛的影响:一项范围综述
Pain Rep. 2021 Feb 16;6(1):e899. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000899. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
6
Post-mortem 11.7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs. Polarized Light Imaging Microscopy to Measure the Angle and Orientation of Dorsal Root Afferents in the Human Cervical Dorsal Root Entry Zone.尸检时11.7特斯拉磁共振成像与偏振光成像显微镜用于测量人颈髓背根入髓区背根传入纤维的角度和方向
Front Neuroanat. 2019 Jul 2;13:66. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2019.00066. eCollection 2019.
7
Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.慢性疼痛治疗临床试验中的患者表型分析:IMMPACT建议
Pain. 2016 Sep;157(9):1851-1871. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000602.
8
Preserved cutaneous silent period in cervical root avulsion.颈神经根撕脱伤中保留的皮肤静息期。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Mar;40(2):175-180. doi: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000053. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
Differential efficacy of electric motor cortex stimulation and lesioning of the dorsal root entry zone for continuous vs paroxysmal pain after brachial plexus avulsion.
臂丛神经撕脱伤后持续与阵发性疼痛的电机皮质刺激与背根入区切断术的疗效差异。
Neurosurgery. 2011 May;68(5):1252-7; discussion 1257-8. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820c04a9.
4
Screening tools for neuropathic pain: can they be of use in individuals with spinal cord injury?神经病理性疼痛的筛查工具:它们对脊髓损伤患者有用吗?
Pain. 2011 Apr;152(4):772-779. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.019. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
5
Treatment of neuropathic deafferentation pain using DREZ lesions; long-term results.使用 DREZ 病变治疗去传入性神经痛:长期结果。
Neurologia. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2010.10.003. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
6
Importance of distinction between paroxysmal and continuous patterns of pain during evaluation of pain after brachial plexus injury.在臂丛神经损伤后疼痛评估中区分阵发性和持续性疼痛模式的重要性。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Feb;153(2):437-8; author reply 439. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0874-4. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
7
Sensory disturbances and pain complaints after brachial plexus root injury: a prospective study involving 150 adult patients.臂丛神经根损伤后的感觉障碍和疼痛主诉:一项涉及 150 例成年患者的前瞻性研究。
Microsurgery. 2011 Feb;31(2):93-7. doi: 10.1002/micr.20832. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
8
Pain and brachial plexus lesions: evaluation of initial outcomes after reconstructive microsurgery and validation of a new pain severity scale.疼痛与臂丛神经损伤:重建显微外科术后早期结果评估及新疼痛严重程度评分量表的验证。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Jan;153(1):171-6. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0709-3. Epub 2010 Jun 13.
9
Follow-up 26 years after dorsal root entry zone thermocoagulation for brachial plexus avulsion and phantom limb pain.臂丛神经根撕脱伤后行脊神经根入区热凝术后 26 年随访及幻肢痛。
J Neurosurg. 2011 Jan;114(1):196-9. doi: 10.3171/2010.5.JNS091520. Epub 2010 May 28.
10
EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision.EFNS 指南:神经病病理性疼痛的药物治疗:2010 年修订版。
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Sep;17(9):1113-e88. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02999.x. Epub 2010 Apr 9.