Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nuffield Orthorpedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7HE, UK.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nuffield Orthorpedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7HE, UK.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Jul;73(7):1208-1220. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.02.043. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMCJ OA) is a common problem. Joint denervation presents a number of theoretical advantages over more traditional surgical options; it is minimally invasive, it does not require a prosthesis or postoperative immobilisation, and does not preclude future surgery. It can be of particular benefit in patients who require good range of motion which other forms of surgery may compromise. Despite these potential advantages, selective denervation of the thumb CMCJ is not considered as part of the routine surgical armamentarium for the treatment of thumb base OA. The purpose of this study is to analyse the evidence for thumb CMCJ denervation; evaluating patient selection, surgical techniques, complications and outcomes. A systematic review was performed on all published literature relating to thumb CMCJ denervation. Nine studies were identified with 184 denervation procedures undertaken in 175 patients. The length of follow-up was available in eight studies (mean 36.5 months [range 6-152 months]). All authors reported improvement in pain and seven studies reported improvement in function. Eleven patients in total suffered persistent joint pain, ten of which proceeded to trapeziectomy and one patient underwent a revision denervation to address potentially missed dorsal sensory branches. The overall complication rate was 11.4% (0-27.5%) consisting of minor complications. This review highlights the paucity of high-quality data and the requirement for a multi-centre, randomised study with validated outcome measures to further define the role of denervation in the management of thumb base OA.
拇指腕掌关节骨关节炎(CMCJOA)是一种常见问题。与更传统的手术选择相比,关节去神经支配具有许多理论优势;它具有微创性,不需要假体或术后固定,并且不排除未来的手术。对于那些需要良好运动范围的患者,其他形式的手术可能会影响运动范围,而这种手术可能特别有益。尽管有这些潜在的优势,但拇指 CMCJ 的选择性去神经支配并不被认为是治疗拇指基部 OA 的常规手术手段的一部分。本研究的目的是分析拇指 CMCJ 去神经支配的证据;评估患者选择、手术技术、并发症和结果。对所有与拇指 CMCJ 去神经支配相关的已发表文献进行了系统回顾。确定了 9 项研究,其中 175 例患者接受了 184 次去神经支配手术。8 项研究中有 7 项提供了随访时间(平均 36.5 个月[范围 6-152 个月])。所有作者均报告疼痛改善,7 项研究报告功能改善。共有 11 名患者持续出现关节疼痛,其中 10 名患者接受了 trapeziectomy,1 名患者接受了 revision denervation 以解决可能遗漏的背侧感觉支。总的并发症发生率为 11.4%(0-27.5%),包括轻微并发症。本综述强调了高质量数据的缺乏,以及需要进行多中心、随机研究,并使用经过验证的结果测量来进一步确定去神经支配在拇指基部 OA 治疗中的作用。