Suppr超能文献

是否到了用 PROMIS 物理功能计算机自适应测试取代 Oswestry 指数的时候了?

Is It Time to Replace the Oswestry Index With PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test?

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Department of Orthopaedics, Austin Regional Clinic, Austin, Texas.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Sep;101(9):1549-1555. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 May 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To address the relative influence of psychological factors on variation in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI) scores.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

We enrolled patients with low back pain, presenting to clinicians specializing in the treatment of spine conditions in a large urban area.

PARTICIPANTS

New and return English-speaking patients (N=116).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The PF CAT and ODI.

METHODS

Patients completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale short form, Patient Health Questionnaire short form (PHQ-2), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire short form (PSEQ-2), PROMIS PF CAT and ODI on a secure tablet.

RESULTS

The 95% CI for the amount of variation in PROMIS PF CAT scores (95% CI, 0.06-0.31) accounted for by psychological measures overlapped with the 95% CI for the amount of variation in ODI scores (CI, 0.26-0.53). PROMIS PF CAT had a strong correlation with ODI (r=-0.69; P<.001). Greater PROMIS PF CAT scores were independently associated with fewer symptoms of depression (β=-1.6; 95% CI, -2.7 to -0.58; P=.003). Higher ODI scores were independently associated with more catastrophic thinking (β=1.2; 95% CI, 0.60-1.88; P<.001) and less self-efficacy (β=-2.4; 95% CI, -3.2 to -1.5; P<.001). PSEQ-2 accounted for the largest proportion of variation in ODI. PHQ-2 accounted for the largest proportion of variation in PROMIS PF CAT. Psychological measures explained more variation in ODI (semipartial R=0.48 for psychological measures; adjusted R full model=0.49) than in PROMIS PF CAT (semipartial R=0.17 for psychological measures; adjusted R full model=0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

The ODI and PROMIS PF CAT are comparably sensitive to psychological factors in patients with persistent lower back pain. Given that the PROMIS PF CAT is more efficient to administer, clinicians might consider using PROMIS PF CAT when assessing physical limitations in patients with persistent lower back pain.

摘要

目的

探讨心理因素对患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)物理功能(PF)计算机自适应测试(CAT)和 Oswestry 下腰痛残疾指数(ODI)评分变化的相对影响。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

我们招募了在一个大城市中专门治疗脊柱疾病的临床医生处就诊的新发和复诊的英语患者。

参与者

新和复诊的英语患者(N=116)。

主要结局测量指标

PF CAT 和 ODI。

方法

患者在安全的平板电脑上完成简短形式的疼痛灾难化量表、患者健康问卷(PHQ-2)、疼痛自我效能问卷(PSEQ-2)、PROMIS PF CAT 和 ODI。

结果

PROMIS PF CAT 评分变化量的 95%置信区间(95%CI,0.06-0.31)与 ODI 评分变化量的 95%置信区间(CI,0.26-0.53)重叠。PROMIS PF CAT 与 ODI 呈强相关性(r=-0.69;P<.001)。更高的 PROMIS PF CAT 评分与更少的抑郁症状独立相关(β=-1.6;95%CI,-2.7 至-0.58;P=.003)。更高的 ODI 评分与更严重的灾难化思维(β=1.2;95%CI,0.60-1.88;P<.001)和更低的自我效能感(β=-2.4;95%CI,-3.2 至-1.5;P<.001)独立相关。PSEQ-2 解释了 ODI 变化的最大比例。PHQ-2 解释了 PROMIS PF CAT 变化的最大比例。心理测量在 ODI 中解释了更多的变异(心理测量的偏部分 R=0.48;调整后的全模型 R=0.49),而在 PROMIS PF CAT 中解释了较少的变异(心理测量的偏部分 R=0.17;调整后的全模型 R=0.31)。

结论

在持续下腰痛患者中,ODI 和 PROMIS PF CAT 对心理因素同样敏感。鉴于 PROMIS PF CAT 更有效,在评估持续下腰痛患者的身体受限程度时,临床医生可能会考虑使用 PROMIS PF CAT。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验