Santiago Ladyodeyse C S, Lyra Maria J, Germano-Soares Antônio H, Lins-Filho Ozeas L, Queiroz Daniel R, Prazeres Thaliane M P, Mello Marco T, Pedrosa Rodrigo P, Falcão Ana P S T, Santos Marcos A M
Department of Physical Education, Associate Graduate Program in Physical Education, University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Health Sciences, University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 May 1;36(5):1222-1227. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003629. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
Santiago, LCS, Lyra, MJ, Germano-Soares, AH, Lins-Filho, OL, Queiroz, DR, Prazeres, TMP, Mello, MT, Pedrosa, RP, Falcão, APST, and Santos, MAM. Effects of strength training on sleep parameters of adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res 36(5): 1222-1227, 2022-This study aimed to examine the effects of 12 weeks of strength training (ST) on sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in adolescents with sleep complaints. Thirty adolescents were randomly assigned to 2 groups: ST group (ST, n = 18) and control group (CG, n = 12). Anthropometric, body composition, one-repetition maximum test, and sleep parameters (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI] and Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) were evaluated. Training consisted of 55 min·d-1 (3 times a week, for 12 weeks), 3 sets of 10-12 repetitions with a 1-minute rest interval between sets and exercises. Baseline and postintervention differences were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations and the effect size (ES) with Cohen's d coefficient. Significance was set at (p < 0.05). After 12 weeks of ST, a significant decrease in the PSQI score (7.3 ± 0.7 vs. 5.1 ± 0.6; ES = 4.10) was observed in the ST group, but not in the CG (6.3 ± 0.8 vs. 7.4 ± 0.7; ES = 1.53). A significant decrease in ESS score was found in the ST group (10.1 ± 0.7 vs. 8.2 ± 0.7; ES = 3.08), without differences in the CG (10.7 ± 0.8 vs. 11.0 ± 0.7; ES = 0.56). The ST group presented increased total sleep duration (h·min-1) (6.2 ± 0.2 vs. 6.9 ± 0.2; ES = 3.60), but not the CG (7.0 ± 0.2 vs. 6.8 ± 0.1; ES = 1.32). Individual analyses showed ≈67% of adolescents experienced a reduction in PSQI (8.3; confidence interval [CI] 95% 6.8-10.1) and ESS (8.3; CI 95% 6.7-9.9) scores after ST, whereas only ≈17% of control subjects presented reduced scores (PSQI [11.1; CI 95% 9.5-12.9] and ESS [11.0; CI 95% 9.4-12.6]). Strength training improved sleep quality and increased total sleep duration.
圣地亚哥、LCS、莱拉、MJ、热尔马诺 - 苏亚雷斯、AH、林斯 - 菲略、OL、奎罗斯、DR、普拉泽雷斯、TMP、梅洛、MT、佩德罗萨、RP、法尔考、APST和桑托斯、MAM。力量训练对青少年睡眠参数的影响:一项随机对照试验。《力量与体能研究杂志》36(5): 1222 - 1227,2022年。本研究旨在探讨为期12周的力量训练(ST)对有睡眠问题的青少年睡眠质量和日间嗜睡的影响。30名青少年被随机分为两组:力量训练组(ST组,n = 18)和对照组(CG组,n = 12)。评估了人体测量学指标、身体成分、一次最大重复次数测试以及睡眠参数(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数[PSQI]和爱泼沃斯嗜睡量表[ESS])。训练包括每天55分钟(每周3次,共12周),每组进行10 - 12次重复,共3组,组间和练习间休息1分钟。使用广义估计方程和效应量(ES)以及科恩d系数分析基线和干预后的差异。显著性设定为(p < 0.05)。经过12周的力量训练后,ST组的PSQI评分显著降低(7.3 ± 0.7 vs. 5.1 ± 0.6;ES = 4.10),而CG组未降低(6.3 ± 0.8 vs. 7.4 ± 0.7;ES = 1.53)。ST组的ESS评分显著降低(10.1 ± 0.7 vs. 8.2 ± 0.7;ES = 3.08),CG组无差异(10.7 ± 0.8 vs. 11.0 ± 0.7;ES = 0.56)。ST组的总睡眠时间(小时·分钟⁻¹)增加(6.2 ± 0.2 vs. 6.9 ± 0.2;ES = 3.60),而CG组未增加(7.0 ± 0.2 vs. 6.8 ± 0.1;ES = 1.32)。个体分析显示,约67%的青少年在力量训练后PSQI(8.3;95%置信区间[CI] 6.8 - 10.1)和ESS(8.3;CI 95% 6.7 - 9.9)评分降低,而对照组中只有约17%的受试者评分降低(PSQI[11.1;CI 95% 9.5 - 12.9]和ESS[11.0;CI 95% 9.4 - 12.6])。力量训练改善了睡眠质量并增加了总睡眠时间。