Lyra Maria Julia, Barros Tércio Araújo do Rego, Tenório Thiago Ricardo Dos Santos, Gomes Willemax Dos Santos, Germano-Soares Antônio Henrique, Freitas-Dias Ricardo, De-Mello Marco Túlio, Santos Marcos André Moura, do Prado Wagner Luiz
University of Pernambuco, Associate PostGraduate Program in Physical Education - Recife - Pernambuco - Brazil.
University of Pernambuco, Hebiatrics Program: Health Determinants in Adolescence - Recife - Pernambuco - Brazil.
Sleep Sci. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(Spec 1):156-163. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20220015.
To compare the effects of self-selected and predetermined intensity on sleep quality and duration, daytime sleepiness, and sleep efficiency of adolescents with obesity after 12 weeks of aerobic training.
Thirty-seven adolescents (12 girls), 13-18 years old, with obesity (BMI = 95th) were randomized into a predetermined intensity group (PIG), exercise intensity around 60-70% of heart rate reserve; or self-selected intensity group (SIG), the adolescents chose the speed/intensity at the beginning of each session and were able to change it every 5 minutes. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were used to assess sleep outcomes.
No differences were observed for PSQI [0.00 ± 2.00 vs 1.38 ± 2.7; p=0.195; d=0.60 (moderate effect)], sleep duration [-0.95 ± 1.2 vs -0.35 ± 1.6; p=0.358; d=0.41 (small effect)], ESS [(2.10 ± 3.9 vs 1.15 ± 4.5; p=0.195; d=0.23 (small effect)], and sleep efficiency [(81.5 ± 24.0 vs 79.4 ± 17.0; p=0.8.14; d=0.10 (trivial effect)] for the PIG and SIG groups, respectively.
Aerobic training at a self- selected or predetermined intensity does not modulate sleep quality, sleep duration and efficiency, and daytime sleepiness, independent of intensity.
比较12周有氧训练后,自选强度和预定强度对肥胖青少年睡眠质量、睡眠时间、日间嗜睡及睡眠效率的影响。
37名13 - 18岁肥胖青少年(12名女孩)(BMI处于第95百分位数)被随机分为预定强度组(PIG),运动强度约为心率储备的60 - 70%;或自选强度组(SIG),青少年在每次训练开始时选择速度/强度,并可每5分钟更改一次。使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和爱泼华嗜睡量表(ESS)评估睡眠结果。
PIG组和SIG组在PSQI[0.00±2.00 vs 1.38±2.7;p = 0.195;d = 0.60(中度效应)]、睡眠时间[-0.95±1.2 vs -0.35±1.6;p = 0.358;d = 0.41(小效应)]、ESS[(2.10±3.9 vs 1.15±4.5;p = 0.195;d = 0.23(小效应)]以及睡眠效率[(81.5±24.0 vs 79.4±17.0;p = 0.814;d = 0.10(微小效应)]方面均未观察到差异。
自选强度或预定强度的有氧训练对睡眠质量、睡眠时间、效率及日间嗜睡无调节作用,与强度无关。