• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺静脉隔离术后的口部尺寸变化:脉冲场消融与射频消融。

Ostial dimensional changes after pulmonary vein isolation: Pulsed field ablation vs radiofrequency ablation.

机构信息

Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Farapulse Inc, Menlo Park, California.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1528-1535. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.040. Epub 2020 May 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.040
PMID:32380290
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is an important potential complication of PV isolation using thermal modalities such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an alternative energy that causes nonthermal myocardial cell death.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of PFA vs RFA on the incidence and severity of PV narrowing or stenosis.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from 4 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation trials using either PFA or RFA; because of absent CT scans or poor computed tomography scan quality, 73 of 153 patients (47.7%) were excluded. Baseline and 3-month cardiac computed tomography scans were reconstructed into 3-dimensional images, and the long and short axes of the PV ostia were quantitatively and qualitatively assessed in a randomized blinded manner by 2 physicians.

RESULTS

A total of 299 PVs from 80 patients after either PFA (n = 37) or RFA (n = 43) were enrolled. PV ostial diameters decreased significantly less with PFA than with RFA (% change; long axis: 0.9% ± 8.5% vs -11.9% ± 16.3%; P < .001 and short axis: 3.4% ± 12.7% vs -12.9% ± 18.5%; P < .001). After a combined quantitative/qualitative analysis, mild (30%-49%), moderate (50%-69%), or severe (70%-100%) PV narrowing was observed, respectively, in 9.0% (15 of 166), 1.8% (3 of 166), and 1.2% (2 of 166) of PVs in the RFA cohort but in none of the PVs after PFA (P < .001). Overall, PV narrowing/stenosis was present in 0% and 0% vs 12.0% and 32.5% of PVs and patients who underwent PFA and RFA, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that unlike after RFA, the incidence and severity of PV narrowing/stenosis after PV isolation is virtually eliminated with PFA.

摘要

背景

肺静脉(PV)狭窄是使用射频消融(RFA)等热模式进行 PV 隔离的重要潜在并发症。脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种引起非热心肌细胞死亡的替代能源。

目的

本研究旨在比较 PFA 与 RFA 对 PV 变窄或狭窄发生率和严重程度的影响。

方法

对使用 PFA 或 RFA 的 4 项阵发性房颤消融试验的数据进行了分析;由于没有 CT 扫描或 CT 扫描质量差,153 例患者中有 73 例(47.7%)被排除在外。基线和 3 个月的心脏 CT 扫描被重建为 3 维图像,由 2 名医生以随机盲法对 PV 口的长轴和短轴进行定量和定性评估。

结果

共纳入 80 例患者的 299 个 PV,其中 PFA 组(n=37)和 RFA 组(n=43)各有 299 个 PV。与 RFA 相比,PFA 后 PV 口直径的变化明显较小(%变化;长轴:0.9%±8.5% vs -11.9%±16.3%;P<.001和短轴:3.4%±12.7% vs -12.9%±18.5%;P<.001)。在进行定量/定性综合分析后,分别在 RFA 组的 9.0%(15/166)、1.8%(3/166)和 1.2%(2/166)的 PV 中观察到轻度(30%-49%)、中度(50%-69%)或重度(70%-100%)PV 狭窄,而在任何 PFA 后 PV 中均未观察到狭窄(P<.001)。总体而言,分别在 0%和 0%的 PFA 组和 12.0%和 32.5%的 PV 组和患者中观察到 PV 狭窄/闭塞。

结论

本研究表明,与 RFA 不同,PV 隔离后 PFA 几乎消除了 PV 狭窄/闭塞的发生率和严重程度。

相似文献

1
Ostial dimensional changes after pulmonary vein isolation: Pulsed field ablation vs radiofrequency ablation.肺静脉隔离术后的口部尺寸变化:脉冲场消融与射频消融。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1528-1535. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.040. Epub 2020 May 4.
2
Pulmonary vein narrowing after pulsed field versus thermal ablation.脉冲场与热消融后肺静脉狭窄。
Europace. 2024 Feb 1;26(2). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae038.
3
Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Preclinical safety and effectiveness of a novel hexaspline ablation catheter.用于肺静脉隔离的脉冲场消融:新型六花键消融导管的临床前安全性和有效性
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;34(11):2195-2202. doi: 10.1111/jce.16067. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
4
Pulsed-field vs cryoballoon vs radiofrequency ablation: Outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.脉冲场消融与冷冻球囊消融和射频消融治疗持续性心房颤动患者的肺静脉隔离:结果对比。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Aug;21(8):1227-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.045. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
5
Anatomy of the pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation and effects of segmental ostial ablation analyzed by computed tomography.心房颤动患者肺静脉的解剖结构及节段性肺静脉口部消融术效果的计算机断层扫描分析
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb;14(2):150-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02444.x.
6
Pulmonary vein stenosis after pulmonary vein isolation using duty-cycled unipolar/bipolar radiofrequency ablation guided by intracardiac echocardiography.在心脏内超声心动图引导下使用占空比单极/双极射频消融进行肺静脉隔离后发生的肺静脉狭窄。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;44(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0028-y. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
7
The anatomic impact of sequential, additional, ostial radiofrequency ablation following pulmonary vein cryo-isolation.肺静脉冷冻隔离术后序贯、额外、开口处射频消融的解剖学影响
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Dec;35(12):1420-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03521.x. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
8
How does the level of pulmonary venous isolation compare between pulsed field ablation and thermal energy ablation (radiofrequency, cryo, or laser)?脉冲场消融与热能消融(射频、冷冻或激光)相比,肺静脉隔离的程度如何?
Europace. 2021 Nov 8;23(11):1757-1766. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab150.
9
Pulsed Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation.脉冲场消融用于房颤的肺静脉隔离。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 23;74(3):315-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.021. Epub 2019 May 11.
10
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using a Novel Variable-Loop Biphasic Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter Integrated With a 3-Dimensional Mapping System: 1-Year Outcomes of the Multicenter inspIRE Study.采用新型可变环双相脉冲场消融导管联合三维标测系统对阵发性心房颤动的消融:多中心 inspIRE 研究的 1 年结果。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;16(3):e011780. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.122.011780. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
JCS/JHRS 2024 Guideline Focused Update on Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias.《日本循环学会/日本心律学会2024年心律失常管理指南重点更新》
J Arrhythm. 2025 Jun 16;41(3):e70033. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70033. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Pulsed Field Ablation: A Systematic Review.脉冲场消融:一项系统综述。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 May 19;8(5):e70439. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70439. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Pulsed Field Ablation: A Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies.脉冲场消融:临床前和临床研究综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Mar 22;12(4):329. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12040329.
4
Catheter ablation using pulsed-field energy: Advantages and limitations compared with conventional energy.使用脉冲场能量的导管消融:与传统能量相比的优势和局限性
J Arrhythm. 2025 Feb 4;41(1):e70011. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70011. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Pulsed field ablation of atrial fibrillation in the setting of pulmonary vein stents: a case report.肺静脉支架置入情况下的心房颤动脉冲场消融:一例报告
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Feb 3. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-02005-y.
6
Effectiveness and Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.脉冲场消融治疗心房颤动患者的有效性和安全性
JACC Asia. 2024 Nov 26;5(1):143-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.09.014. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Pulse Field Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation and Its Comparison with Traditional Thermal Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脉冲场消融治疗心房颤动的安全性和有效性及其与传统热消融的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 21;25(11):415. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2511415. eCollection 2024 Nov.
8
Cardiac selectivity in pulsed field ablation.脉冲场消融中的心脏选择性
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2025 Jan 1;40(1):37-41. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001183. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
9
Efficacy and safety of pulsed-field versus conventional thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.脉冲场消融与传统热消融治疗心房颤动的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Arrhythm. 2024 Jul 18;40(5):1059-1074. doi: 10.1002/joa3.13118. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
Pulsed Field Ablation: A Comprehensive Update.脉冲场消融:全面更新
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 1;13(17):5191. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175191.