School of Social Work, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Omega (Westport). 2022 Mar;84(4):998-1010. doi: 10.1177/0030222820925365. Epub 2020 May 7.
The rise in research publications over the last few decades about disenfranchised grief has deepened our understanding of this field. Importantly, it raises awareness and validates human experiences of bereavement, which are often socially ignored, muted, and stigmatized. However, while researchers in the field actively engage in the task of "enfranchisement," as they present their work at scientific conferences, they might experience what we term in the academic sphere. Based on our own experience, this article will demonstrate the parallel pathways between disenfranchisement of bereaved individuals and disenfranchisement of disenfranchised grief researchers, as it emerges in three main expressions of disenfranchisement: reluctance to listen, shame and guilt inflicting, and demand for euphemism. A conclusive note on how to address this kind of disenfranchisement is suggested.
在过去几十年中,关于被剥夺权利的悲伤的研究出版物的增加,加深了我们对这一领域的理解。重要的是,它提高了人们对丧亲之痛的认识,并验证了这些经历,而这些经历往往在社会上被忽视、压制和污名化。然而,尽管该领域的研究人员在科学会议上展示他们的工作时积极参与“赋权”任务,但他们可能会经历我们在学术领域中所说的。基于我们自己的经验,本文将展示丧亲者和被剥夺权利的悲伤研究人员被剥夺权利的并行途径,因为它表现在被剥夺权利的三个主要表现形式中:不愿意倾听、施加羞耻和内疚、以及对委婉语的需求。本文提出了一个关于如何解决这种被剥夺权利的问题的结论性说明。