• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围产期悲伤的剥夺权利:沉默、压制和自我审查如何使丧亲之痛复杂化(一项混合方法研究)

The Disenfranchisement of Perinatal Grief: How Silence, Silencing and Self-Censorship Complicate Bereavement (a Mixed Methods Study).

作者信息

Cassidy Paul Richard

机构信息

Sociology and Anthropology Doctoral Programme, Faculty of Political Science and Sociology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Umamanita (Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Charity), Girona, Spain.

出版信息

Omega (Westport). 2023 Dec;88(2):709-731. doi: 10.1177/00302228211050500. Epub 2021 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1177/00302228211050500
PMID:34632863
Abstract

Based on an ethnographic and mixed-methods research design, the article explores the social and interactive processes of disenfranchisement of perinatal grief through the mechanisms of silence, silencing and self-censorship in encounters between bereaved women and the social milieu. The analysis finds that disenfranchisement results from the constriction of the social space of bereavement along various lines of discourse, cultural values, practice and materiality, that include: the passing of time (expectations of a quick 'recovery'); competing discourses of loss (simplistic-dominant vs. complex-subordinate meaning-making); the biometrics of pregnancy (lower gestational age being equated with less intense grief); gendered ideas of reproduction and feeling rules; asymmetries in social power; social spheres (hospital, home, community, support groups); socio-materialities and performance/ritual; and structural aspects of social and familial organization (gender, age, intergenerational and kin v. non-kin relations). These processes are intimately linked to the complication of grief by undermining support, meaning-making and continuing bonds.

摘要

基于人种志和混合方法研究设计,本文通过丧亲女性与社会环境相遇时的沉默、沉默化和自我审查机制,探讨了围产期悲伤被剥夺权利的社会和互动过程。分析发现,被剥夺权利源于丧亲社会空间在话语、文化价值观、实践和物质性等各方面的收缩,包括:时间的流逝(对快速“恢复”的期望);关于丧失的相互竞争的话语(简单主导型与复杂从属型意义建构);怀孕的生物特征(较低的孕周等同于较轻的悲伤);关于生殖和情感规则的性别观念;社会权力的不对称;社会领域(医院、家庭、社区、支持团体);社会物质性与表现/仪式;以及社会和家庭组织的结构方面(性别、年龄、代际和亲属与非亲属关系)。这些过程通过破坏支持、意义建构和持续联系,与悲伤的复杂化密切相关。

相似文献

1
The Disenfranchisement of Perinatal Grief: How Silence, Silencing and Self-Censorship Complicate Bereavement (a Mixed Methods Study).围产期悲伤的剥夺权利:沉默、压制和自我审查如何使丧亲之痛复杂化(一项混合方法研究)
Omega (Westport). 2023 Dec;88(2):709-731. doi: 10.1177/00302228211050500. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
2
The perinatal bereavement project: development and evaluation of supportive guidelines for families experiencing stillbirth and neonatal death in Southeast Brazil-a quasi-experimental before-and-after study.围产期丧亲项目:为巴西东南部经历死产和新生儿死亡的家庭制定和评估支持性指南-一项准实验性前后研究。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jan 6;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01040-4.
3
"Empty Chairs at Empty Tables": Disenfranchisement by Association."空椅子空桌子": 被牵连而被剥夺权利。
Omega (Westport). 2022 Mar;84(4):998-1010. doi: 10.1177/0030222820925365. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Life after the loss: protocol for a Danish longitudinal follow-up study unfolding life and grief after the death of a child during pregnancy from gestational week 14, during birth or in the first 4 weeks of life.失子后的生活:丹麦一项纵向随访研究的方案,该研究展现了妊娠第14周、分娩期间或出生后前4周内胎儿死亡后母亲的生活与悲痛经历。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e024278. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024278.
5
Complicated grief after perinatal loss.围产期丧亲后的复杂性悲伤
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jun;14(2):187-94. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.2/akersting.
6
Perinatal grief and support spans the generations: parents' and grandparents' evaluations of an intergenerational perinatal bereavement program.围产期悲伤与支持跨越代际:父母及祖父母对一项代际围产期丧亲项目的评价
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2011 Jan-Mar;25(1):77-85. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e318208cb74.
7
Evidence for healing interventions with perinatal bereavement.围产期丧亲之痛的愈合干预证据。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2005 Nov-Dec;30(6):389-96. doi: 10.1097/00005721-200511000-00007.
8
Meaning Co-Construction: Facilitating Shared Family Meaning-Making in Bereavement.意义共建:促进丧亲之痛中家庭的共同意义构建
Fam Process. 2022 Mar;61(1):7-24. doi: 10.1111/famp.12671. Epub 2021 May 18.
9
A Literature Review: Pet Bereavement and Coping Mechanisms.文献综述:宠物丧亲与应对机制。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2023 Jul-Sep;26(3):285-299. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2021.1934839. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
10
Living with Loss: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating an internet-based perinatal bereavement program for parents following stillbirth and neonatal death.带着失去生活:一项随机对照试验的研究方案,评估针对因死胎和新生儿死亡而丧子的父母的基于互联网的围产期丧亲项目。
Trials. 2022 Jun 6;23(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06363-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A womb and a tomb: mothers' experiences of single fetal loss in a twin pregnancy.子宫与坟墓:母亲在双胎妊娠中经历单胎流产的体验
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 29;25(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07922-4.
2
Complicated grief following the perinatal loss: a systematic review.围产期丧失后出现的复杂性悲伤:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Nov 22;24(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06986-y.
3
Midwives' support for parents following stillbirth: How they practise and resources they need from a phenomenological perspective.
助产士对死产后父母的支持:从现象学角度看他们的实践方式及所需资源。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Mar;81(3):1554-1567. doi: 10.1111/jan.16385. Epub 2024 Aug 11.
4
Perinatal Loss and Parents' Grief Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Research.新冠疫情期间的围产期死亡与父母的悲痛:一项混合方法研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;14(4):339. doi: 10.3390/bs14040339.
5
Paternal Experiences of Perinatal Loss-A Scoping Review.父职体验与围生期丧失:范围综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;20(6):4886. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064886.
6
Exploring Gender Differences in Adult Siblings' Recollections on Perinatal Loss.探究成年兄弟姐妹对围产期死亡回忆中的性别差异。
Omega (Westport). 2025 May;91(1):5-25. doi: 10.1177/00302228221131369. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
7
Initial Impact of Perinatal Loss on Mothers and Their Partners.围产期丧失对母亲及其伴侣的初始影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;20(2):1304. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021304.