Cassidy Paul Richard
Sociology and Anthropology Doctoral Programme, Faculty of Political Science and Sociology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Umamanita (Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Charity), Girona, Spain.
Omega (Westport). 2023 Dec;88(2):709-731. doi: 10.1177/00302228211050500. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
Based on an ethnographic and mixed-methods research design, the article explores the social and interactive processes of disenfranchisement of perinatal grief through the mechanisms of silence, silencing and self-censorship in encounters between bereaved women and the social milieu. The analysis finds that disenfranchisement results from the constriction of the social space of bereavement along various lines of discourse, cultural values, practice and materiality, that include: the passing of time (expectations of a quick 'recovery'); competing discourses of loss (simplistic-dominant vs. complex-subordinate meaning-making); the biometrics of pregnancy (lower gestational age being equated with less intense grief); gendered ideas of reproduction and feeling rules; asymmetries in social power; social spheres (hospital, home, community, support groups); socio-materialities and performance/ritual; and structural aspects of social and familial organization (gender, age, intergenerational and kin v. non-kin relations). These processes are intimately linked to the complication of grief by undermining support, meaning-making and continuing bonds.
基于人种志和混合方法研究设计,本文通过丧亲女性与社会环境相遇时的沉默、沉默化和自我审查机制,探讨了围产期悲伤被剥夺权利的社会和互动过程。分析发现,被剥夺权利源于丧亲社会空间在话语、文化价值观、实践和物质性等各方面的收缩,包括:时间的流逝(对快速“恢复”的期望);关于丧失的相互竞争的话语(简单主导型与复杂从属型意义建构);怀孕的生物特征(较低的孕周等同于较轻的悲伤);关于生殖和情感规则的性别观念;社会权力的不对称;社会领域(医院、家庭、社区、支持团体);社会物质性与表现/仪式;以及社会和家庭组织的结构方面(性别、年龄、代际和亲属与非亲属关系)。这些过程通过破坏支持、意义建构和持续联系,与悲伤的复杂化密切相关。