Chinook Contract Research Inc., Airdrie, Alberta, Canada.
Animal Pathology Services Ltd., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Burns. 2020 Nov;46(7):1632-1640. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
A variety of silver-based antimicrobial dressings are available on the market and are commonly used to prevent infection. Such prophylaxis is particularly important in treating burns, yet there is a paucity of evidence confirming the efficacy of commercially available dressingsin vivo. We describe here an in vivo porcine model of burns, which we use to test the antimicrobial efficacy of three common wound dressings and a control.
Domestic Yorkshire-cross pigs were medicated for pain management before inflicting burns with a heated brass rod. The wounds were artificially challenged with a mixture of two pathogens commonly associated with burn wound infection:Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The following dressing materials were sutured in place: gauze, nanocrystalline silver, silver-plated nylon, and polyethylene/polyester coated with high-oxidation silver salts. After 1 and 3 days, the wounds were assessed for erythema, swelling, and re-epithelialization, tissue was biopsied to determine the recovery of the challenge microorganisms, and histology was performed. We also examined the number of microorganisms present on the dressings themselves.
Histology indicated that 30 s was sufficient to produce burns extending into the deep dermal layer. After 3 days, nanocrystalline silver and silver-plated nylon led to slightly reduced swelling relative to simple gauze, although none of the dressings significantly affected erythema or wound re-epithelialization. All the dressings led to decreased recovery of the challenge organisms from the burn tissue, relative to simple gauze. However, the magnitude of the reduction was greatest for nanocrystalline silver (log reduction = 4-5); additionally, only nanocrystalline silver gave a statistically significant decrease (P = 0.02). Notably, the antimicrobial effect for all dressings was reduced by Day 3 relative to Day 1. Similar trends were observed for microbial retention on the dressings themselves.
Nanocrystalline silver-based wound dressings generally outperformed silver-plated nylon and high-oxidation silver salts in thisin vivo model of burn wounds. Relative to prophylactic use, it may be advisable to change the dressings more frequently when treating an infected wound.
市场上有多种含银的抗菌敷料,通常用于预防感染。这种预防措施在治疗烧伤时尤为重要,但目前缺乏证实市售敷料在体内疗效的确切证据。我们在这里描述了一种体内猪烧伤模型,我们使用该模型来测试三种常见伤口敷料和一种对照敷料的抗菌效果。
对约克郡杂交猪进行疼痛管理药物治疗,然后用加热的铜管棒造成烧伤。用两种常见的与烧伤伤口感染相关的病原体混合物(金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌)人为地对伤口进行挑战。将以下敷料缝合到位:纱布、纳米级银、镀银尼龙和涂有高氧化银盐的聚乙烯/聚酯。在第 1 天和第 3 天,评估伤口的红斑、肿胀和再上皮化情况,对活检组织中挑战微生物的恢复情况进行评估,并进行组织学检查。我们还检查了敷料本身存在的微生物数量。
组织学表明,30 秒足以产生深达真皮层的烧伤。第 3 天,纳米级银和镀银尼龙相对于普通纱布导致肿胀略有减轻,尽管没有一种敷料显著影响红斑或伤口再上皮化。与普通纱布相比,所有敷料均导致从烧伤组织中回收的挑战微生物减少。然而,纳米级银的减少幅度最大(对数减少= 4-5);此外,只有纳米级银的减少具有统计学意义(P=0.02)。值得注意的是,与第 1 天相比,第 3 天所有敷料的抗菌效果均降低。在敷料本身保留微生物方面也观察到了类似的趋势。
在这种体内烧伤模型中,纳米级银基伤口敷料通常优于镀银尼龙和高氧化银盐。与预防性使用相比,在治疗感染伤口时,可能需要更频繁地更换敷料。