Gabbe Belinda J, Veitch William, Curtis Kate, Martin Kate, Gomez David, Civil Ian, Moran Chris, Teague Warwick J, Holland Andrew J A, Lecky Fiona, Fitzgerald Mark, Nathens Avery, Joseph Anthony
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building (A27) Fisher Road, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia.
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 2;21:100322. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100322. eCollection 2020 Apr.
Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) are increasing. Trauma centres play a key role in MCIs due to their readiness and expansive multidisciplinary expertise for injury management. Previous studies have shown deficiencies in trauma centre disaster preparedness. The aim of this study was to describe the current disaster preparedness of Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) in Australia, Canada, England and New Zealand.
A cross-sectional survey of all ( = 82) MTCs was undertaken. The anonymous survey collected data about disaster preparedness in nine key areas. Respondents were encouraged to consult appropriately at their centre to provide an accurate representation of their centre's preparedness.
Responses were received from 69 (84%) centres; 61 completed all questions. 91% had a disaster preparedness committee and 80% had an all-hazards emergency plan. 79% had held an MCI drill in the past 2 years. 54% reported a system in place to calculate maximum capacity, but testing of surge capacity was uncommon. 55% reported the presence of stored resources for an MCI and 58% had a database of staff trained in Emergency Management. 74% had a training and education plan available for staff involved in an MCI and a plan for professional debriefing of staff post-MCI, while 62% had a post-disaster employee assistance programme. Most centres had appropriate back-up communication, safety and security plans.
The disaster preparedness of MTCs was high for communication, safety and security but there was clear need for improvement in other areas including surge capacity, human resources and post-disaster recovery.
大规模伤亡事件(MCI)日益增多。创伤中心因其在伤病管理方面的准备就绪情况和广泛的多学科专业知识,在大规模伤亡事件中发挥着关键作用。先前的研究表明创伤中心在灾难准备方面存在不足。本研究的目的是描述澳大利亚、加拿大、英格兰和新西兰主要创伤中心(MTC)当前的灾难准备情况。
对所有82家主要创伤中心进行了横断面调查。匿名调查收集了九个关键领域的灾难准备数据。鼓励受访者在其中心进行适当咨询,以准确反映其中心的准备情况。
收到了69家(84%)中心的回复;61家完成了所有问题。91%的中心设有灾难准备委员会,80%的中心有全灾种应急预案。79%的中心在过去两年内进行过大规模伤亡事件演练。54%的中心报告有计算最大容量的系统,但很少进行激增容量测试。55%的中心报告有大规模伤亡事件的储备资源,58%的中心有接受过应急管理培训的员工数据库。74%的中心有为参与大规模伤亡事件的员工制定的培训和教育计划,以及大规模伤亡事件后员工专业汇报计划,而62%的中心有灾后员工援助计划。大多数中心有适当的备用通信、安全和安保计划。
主要创伤中心在通信、安全和安保方面的灾难准备情况良好,但在其他领域,包括激增容量、人力资源和灾后恢复方面,显然有改进的必要。