Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗联合细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗治疗阑尾癌的疗效。

Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before CRS-HIPEC for patients with appendiceal cancer.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;122(3):388-398. doi: 10.1002/jso.25967. Epub 2020 May 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is indicated for patients with peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal cancer. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before CRS-HIPEC remains controversial.

METHODS

A retrospective review of adult patients who underwent CRS ± HIPEC for metastatic appendiceal cancer between 2000-2017 was performed. Patients who received NAC followed by surgery were compared with those who underwent surgery first (SF) with and without 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Among 803 patients with appendiceal cancer who underwent CRS ± HIPEC, 225 (28%) received NAC, and 578 (72%) underwent SF. After PSM (n = 186), median overall survival (OS) did not differ (NAC: 40 vs SF: 56 months; P = .210) but recurrence-free survival (RFS) was worse among patients who received NAC (14 vs 22 months; P = .007). NAC was independently associated with worse OS (hazards ratio [HR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-3.18) and RFS (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.25-2.99).

CONCLUSION

In this multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with peritoneal dissemination from appendiceal cancer, the use of NAC before CRS-HIPEC was associated with worse OS and RFS even after PSM and multivariable regression. Immediate surgery should be considered for patients with disease amenable to complete cytoreduction.

摘要

背景

细胞减灭术(CRS)联合或不联合腹腔内热化疗(HIPEC)适用于阑尾癌腹膜转移患者。CRS-HIPEC 前新辅助化疗(NAC)的作用仍存在争议。

方法

对 2000 年至 2017 年间接受 CRS±HIPEC 治疗转移性阑尾癌的成年患者进行回顾性分析。比较接受 NAC 后手术的患者与直接手术(SF)的患者,并进行 1:1 倾向评分匹配(PSM)。

结果

在 803 例接受 CRS±HIPEC 治疗的阑尾癌患者中,225 例(28%)接受 NAC,578 例(72%)接受 SF。经过 PSM(n=186)后,总生存期(OS)无差异(NAC:40 个月 vs SF:56 个月;P=0.210),但接受 NAC 的患者无复发生存期(RFS)更差(14 个月 vs 22 个月;P=0.007)。NAC 与较差的 OS(风险比 [HR],1.81;95%置信区间 [CI],1.03-3.18)和 RFS(HR,1.93;95% CI,1.25-2.99)独立相关。

结论

在这项多机构回顾性分析中,对于腹膜转移的阑尾癌患者,即使经过 PSM 和多变量回归分析,CRS-HIPEC 前使用 NAC 与较差的 OS 和 RFS 相关。对于适合完全细胞减灭的患者,应考虑立即手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验