• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AJCC 第 8 版分期系统对接受细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗治疗的转移性阑尾癌患者的验证:一项多机构分析。

Validation of the AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Disseminated Appendiceal Cancer Patients Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Multi-institutional Analysis.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep;30(9):5743-5753. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13697-9. Epub 2023 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-023-13697-9
PMID:37294386
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The AJCC 8th edition stratifies stage IV disseminated appendiceal cancer (dAC) patients based on grade and pathology. This study was designed to externally validate the staging system and to identify predictors of long-term survival.

METHODS

A 12-institution cohort of dAC patients treated with CRS ± HIPEC was retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate cox-regression was performed to assess factors associated with OS and RFS.

RESULTS

Among 1009 patients, 708 had stage IVA and 301 had stage IVB disease. Median OS (120.4 mo vs. 47.2 mo) and RFS (79.3 mo vs. 19.8 mo) was significantly higher in stage IVA compared with IVB patients (p < 0.0001). RFS was greater among IVA-M1a (acellular mucin only) than IV M1b/G1 (well-differentiated cellular dissemination) patients (NR vs. 64 mo, p = 0.0004). Survival significantly differed between mucinous and nonmucinous tumors (OS 106.1 mo vs. 41.0 mo; RFS 46.7 mo vs. 21.2 mo, p < 0.05), and OS differed between well, moderate, and poorly differentiated (120.4 mo vs. 56.3 mo vs. 32.9 mo, p < 0.05). Both stage and grade were independent predictors of OS and RFS on multivariate analysis. Acellular mucin and mucinous histology were associated with better OS and RFS on univariate analysis only.

CONCLUSIONS

AJCC 8 edition performed well in predicting outcomes in this large cohort of dAC patients treated with CRS ± HIPEC. Separation of stage IVA patients based on the presence of acellular mucin improved prognostication, which may inform treatment and long-term, follow-up strategies.

摘要

背景

AJCC 第 8 版根据分级和病理将 IV 期播散性阑尾癌(dAC)患者分为不同的分期。本研究旨在对该分期系统进行外部验证,并确定长期生存的预测因素。

方法

回顾性分析了 12 家机构接受 CRS ± HIPEC 治疗的 dAC 患者的队列。采用 Kaplan-Meier 和对数秩检验分析总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。采用单因素和多因素 cox 回归分析评估与 OS 和 RFS 相关的因素。

结果

在 1009 例患者中,708 例为 IVA 期,301 例为 IVB 期。与 IVB 期患者相比,IVA 期患者的中位 OS(120.4 个月 vs. 47.2 个月)和 RFS(79.3 个月 vs. 19.8 个月)显著提高(p < 0.0001)。IVA-M1a(无细胞黏蛋白)患者的 RFS 高于 IV M1b/G1(分化良好的细胞播散)患者(NR 与 64 个月,p = 0.0004)。黏液性和非黏液性肿瘤的生存差异显著(OS 为 106.1 个月 vs. 41.0 个月;RFS 为 46.7 个月 vs. 21.2 个月,p < 0.05),OS 在分化良好、中度和低度之间也存在差异(120.4 个月 vs. 56.3 个月 vs. 32.9 个月,p < 0.05)。在多变量分析中,分期和分级均为 OS 和 RFS 的独立预测因素。在单因素分析中,无细胞黏蛋白和黏液组织学与更好的 OS 和 RFS 相关。

结论

AJCC 第 8 版在预测接受 CRS ± HIPEC 治疗的大量 dAC 患者的预后方面表现良好。根据有无无细胞黏蛋白对 IVA 期患者进行分层,可改善预后,这可能为治疗和长期随访策略提供信息。

相似文献

1
Validation of the AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Disseminated Appendiceal Cancer Patients Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Multi-institutional Analysis.AJCC 第 8 版分期系统对接受细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗治疗的转移性阑尾癌患者的验证:一项多机构分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep;30(9):5743-5753. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13697-9. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
2
The 7th Edition of the AJCC Staging Classification Correlates with Biologic Behavior of Mucinous Appendiceal Tumor with Peritoneal Metastases Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC).美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期分类第7版与接受细胞减灭术和腹腔内热灌注化疗(CRS/HIPEC)治疗的伴有腹膜转移的黏液性阑尾肿瘤的生物学行为相关。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(6):1928-33. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5047-5. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
3
Prognostic significance of acellular mucin in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for appendiceal neoplasms.在接受细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗(CRS/HIPEC)治疗阑尾肿瘤的患者中,无细胞黏蛋白的预后意义。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Feb 28;408(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02732-0.
4
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy + early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy alone: assessment of survival outcomes for colorectal and high-grade appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis.热灌注腹腔化疗联合术后早期腹腔化疗与单纯热灌注腹腔化疗的比较:结直肠癌和高级别阑尾腹膜癌病生存结局评估
Am J Surg. 2015 Sep;210(3):424-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 May 12.
5
Predictive and prognostic survival factors in peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal cancer after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.阑尾癌腹膜转移行细胞减灭术联合热灌注化疗后的生存预测及预后因素
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;21(13):4218-25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3869-1. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
6
Is Cytoreductive Surgery-Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Still Indicated in Patients With Extraperitoneal Disease?细胞减灭术-腹腔内热灌注化疗在外周性疾病患者中是否仍有适应证?
J Surg Res. 2022 Sep;277:269-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.007. Epub 2022 May 4.
7
Adverse Events Postoperatively Had No Impact on Long-Term Survival of Patients Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery with Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Appendiceal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases.术后不良事件对接受减瘤手术联合热腹腔内化疗治疗的阑尾癌伴腹膜转移患者的长期生存无影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(13):4231-4237. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5355-4. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
8
Oncologic Risk Stratification Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Appendiceal Carcinomatosis.阑尾癌病行细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗后的肿瘤学风险分层
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1587-93. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5037-7. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
9
Systemic chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) in patients with high-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei of appendiceal origin.原发阑尾的高级别黏液性腹膜癌患者行细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗(CRS/HIPEC)前的全身化疗。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;45(9):1598-1606. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 9.
10
Predictors of progression in high-grade appendiceal or colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.细胞减灭术和腹腔内热灌注化疗后高级别阑尾或结直肠腹膜癌转移进展的预测因素
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 May;22(5):1716-21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3985-y. Epub 2014 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining a 'cells to society' research framework for appendiceal tumours.为阑尾肿瘤定义一个“细胞到社会”的研究框架。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2025 Apr;25(4):293-315. doi: 10.1038/s41568-024-00788-2. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform.经单孔或多孔机器人平台微创细胞减灭性根治性前列腺切除术,探索其安全性和可行性。
BMC Urol. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01463-2.
3
Current Status of Treatment among Patients with Appendiceal Tumors-Old Challenges and New Solutions?

本文引用的文献

1
Do Lymph Node Metastases Matter in Appendiceal Cancer with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis? A US HIPEC Collaborative Study.阑尾癌伴腹膜转移中淋巴结转移是否重要?美国 HIPEC 协作研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Dec;26(12):2569-2578. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05489-5. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
2
Comparative study of mucinous and non-mucinous appendiceal neoplasms with peritoneal dissemination treated by cyoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).黏液性和非黏液性阑尾肿瘤伴腹膜转移行细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)的对比研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 May;47(5):1132-1139. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
阑尾肿瘤患者的治疗现状——旧挑战与新解决方案?
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;16(5):866. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050866.
4
AJCC Cancer Staging System Version 9: Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma.美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)癌症分期系统第9版:阑尾腺癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2177-2180. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14892-y. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before CRS-HIPEC for patients with appendiceal cancer.
新辅助化疗联合细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗治疗阑尾癌的疗效。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;122(3):388-398. doi: 10.1002/jso.25967. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Trends in the indications for and short-term outcomes of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.腹腔内热灌注化疗的细胞减灭术适应证及短期疗效的变化趋势。
Am J Surg. 2020 Mar;219(3):478-483. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
5
Should We Be Doing Cytoreductive Surgery with HIPEC for Signet Ring Cell Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma? A Study from the US HIPEC Collaborative.我们是否应该对印戒细胞阑尾腺癌行细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗?来自美国 HIPEC 协作组的一项研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jan;24(1):155-164. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04336-4. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
6
Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei from Appendicular Origin Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy-A Retrospective Study from INDEPSO.阑尾源性腹膜假黏液瘤行细胞减灭术和腹腔内热灌注化疗后的临床结局分析——来自INDEPSO的一项回顾性研究
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;10(Suppl 1):65-70. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-00870-w. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
7
Predicting Survival After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Appendix Adenocarcinoma.预测阑尾腺癌行细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗后的生存情况。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Jul;61(7):795-802. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001076.
8
Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Moderately and Poorly Differentiated Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: Survival Outcomes and Patient Selection.细胞减灭术和腹腔内热化疗治疗中低分化阑尾腺癌:生存结果和患者选择。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;24(9):2646-2654. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5938-8. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
9
The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging.第八版 AJCC 癌症分期手册:继续从基于人群的方法向更“个体化”的癌症分期方法构建桥梁。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):93-99. doi: 10.3322/caac.21388. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
10
The Management and Prognostic Prediction of Adenocarcinoma of Appendix.阑尾腺癌的处理与预后预测。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 16;6:39027. doi: 10.1038/srep39027.