Turner Jennifer, Eliot Hodgson Luke, Leckie Todd, Eade Lisa, Ford-Dunn Suzanne
ST5 Geriatric Medicine, Worthing Hospital, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK.
Intensive Care Department, Worthing Hospital Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK; Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Aug;60(2):e75-e78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.031. Epub 2020 May 6.
The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put significant strain on all aspects of health care delivery, including palliative care services. Given the high mortality from this disease, particularly in the more vulnerable members of society, it is important to examine how best to deliver a high standard of end-of-life care during this crisis. This case series collected data from two acute hospitals examining the management of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who subsequently died (n = 36) and compared this with national and local end-of-life audit data for all other deaths. Our results demonstrated a shorter dying phase (38.25 hours vs. 74 hours) and higher rates of syringe driver use (72% vs. 33% in local audits), although with similar average mediation doses. Of note was the significant heterogeneity in the phenotype of deterioration in the dying phase, two distinct patterns emerged, with one group demonstrating severe illness with a short interval between symptom onset and death and another group presenting with a more protracted deterioration. This brief report suggests a spectrum of mode of dying. Overall, the cohort reflects previously described experiences, with increased frailty (median Clinical Frailty Scale score of 5) and extensive comorbidity burden. This brief report provides clinicians with a contemporaneous overview of our experience, knowledge, and pattern recognition when caring for people with COVID-19 and highlights the value of proactive identification of patients and risk of deterioration and palliation.
当前的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给医疗服务的各个方面带来了巨大压力,包括姑息治疗服务。鉴于该疾病的高死亡率,尤其是在社会中较脆弱的人群中,研究在这场危机期间如何以最佳方式提供高标准的临终关怀非常重要。本病例系列收集了两家急症医院的数据,研究了被诊断为COVID-19并随后死亡的患者(n = 36)的管理情况,并将其与所有其他死亡病例的国家和地方临终审核数据进行了比较。我们的结果显示,死亡阶段较短(38.25小时对74小时),使用注射器驱动泵的比例较高(72%对地方审核中的33%),尽管平均药物剂量相似。值得注意的是,死亡阶段病情恶化的表型存在显著异质性,出现了两种不同的模式,一组表现为严重疾病,症状出现到死亡的间隔较短,另一组表现为病情恶化更为迁延。这份简短报告提示了一系列死亡模式。总体而言,该队列反映了先前描述的经验,虚弱程度增加(临床虚弱量表中位数评分为5),合并症负担广泛。这份简短报告为临床医生提供了在照顾COVID-19患者时我们的经验、知识和模式识别的同期概述,并强调了主动识别患者、病情恶化风险和姑息治疗的价值。