J Emerg Nurs. 2020 May;46(3):318-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.02.007.
A high degree of suspicion for spinal injury after trauma is commonplace in an emergency department, and spinal immobilization is considered an accepted intervention to prevent the progression of a potential injury. This systematic review was conducted to gain insight into the best research evidence related to nursing interventions for patients with trauma presenting with a suspected spinal injury.
A systematic search of online databases was conducted in April 2019 for relevant research using specific search terms. The studies were selected on the basis of pre-established eligibility criteria, and the quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool.
Nineteen included articles were synthesized thematically on the basis of the outcomes from interventions directed at a suspected spinal injury. The main findings were that spinal immobilization may compromise pulmonary function and airway management, cause pain and pressure ulcers, and be inappropriate with penetrating trauma. Furthermore, there was insufficient evidence to support the safety and efficacy of the hard neck collar and long backboard.
Patients would benefit from a more selective and cautious approach to spinal immobilization. Emergency nurses should use the evidence to facilitate informed decision-making in balancing the benefits of spinal immobilization against harm when considering the needs and values of the patient.
在急诊科,创伤后对脊柱损伤的高度怀疑是很常见的,脊柱固定被认为是预防潜在损伤进展的一种公认的干预措施。本系统评价旨在深入了解与创伤后出现疑似脊柱损伤的患者护理干预相关的最佳研究证据。
2019 年 4 月,使用特定搜索词对在线数据库进行了系统搜索,以获取相关研究。根据预先确定的资格标准选择研究,并使用关键评估技能计划工具评估质量。
根据针对疑似脊柱损伤的干预措施的结果,19 篇纳入的文章进行了主题综合。主要发现是,脊柱固定可能会损害肺功能和气道管理,导致疼痛和压疮,并且在穿透性创伤中不适用。此外,没有足够的证据支持硬颈圈和长背板的安全性和有效性。
患者将从更具选择性和谨慎性的脊柱固定方法中受益。急诊护士应使用证据来帮助在平衡脊柱固定的益处和危害时,为患者的需求和价值观做出明智的决策。