英国 EQ-5D-5L 价值集：对“质量保证”的回应。
The EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England: Response to the "Quality Assurance".
机构信息
School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK; Pharmerit International, York, England, UK.
School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK; Center for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
出版信息
Value Health. 2020 May;23(5):649-655. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.013. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
OBJECTIVES
To respond to the 'quality assurance' of the EQ-5D-5L value set for England study.
METHODS
We provide a point-by-point response to the issues raised by the authors of the quality assurance paper, drawing on theoretical arguments, empirical analyses and practical considerations.
RESULTS
We provide evidence to show that many of the points made by the authors of the quality assurance are misleading, suggest misunderstandings, or are irrelevant.
CONCLUSIONS
The modeling approaches which were used appropriately address the characteristics of the data and provide a reasonable representation of the average stated preferences of general public in England. We provide reflections on the conduct of stated preference studies, and suggestions for the way forward.
目的
回应英格兰研究中 EQ-5D-5L 值集的“质量保证”。
方法
我们针对质量保证文件作者提出的问题进行了逐点回应，借鉴了理论论证、实证分析和实际考虑。
结果
我们提供的证据表明，质量保证文件作者提出的许多观点具有误导性、表明存在误解或不相关。
结论
所使用的建模方法适当地处理了数据的特征，并对英格兰普通公众的平均表述偏好进行了合理的表述。我们对表述偏好研究的进行进行了反思，并提出了前进的方向。
Zotero 插件