Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, 525 Pine St, Scranton, PA 18510, United States.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Injury. 2020 Jul;51(7):1497-1508. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.04.019. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
Tibio-talo calcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is increasingly performed for hindfoot arthrosis and other indications. Peri-implant fracture around hindfoot fusion nails has been previously reported and can be problematic to treat given multiple surgical considerations including the status of hindfoot arthrodesis at time of fracture. We present a systematic review of the literature regarding peri-implant fractures around hindfoot fusion nails and propose a classification system to help guide treatment based on findings from the current literature as well as the collective experience of the senior authors.
A review of the literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify clinical investigations in which peri-implant fractures or other hardware failures were observed as complications following TTC arthrodesis using hindfoot nails. The electronic database of PubMed/Medline/Cochrane Library was explored using specific search terms. Inclusion criteria was any clinical investigation that reported on outcomes after TTC arthrodesis using a hindfoot nail in at least one patient. Cadaveric and non-clinical investigations were excluded.
A total of 36 studies were identified which met inclusion criteria and reported clinical outcomes after TTC arthrodesis using a hindfoot fusion nail. Of the 36 studies, there was a total of 13 intraoperative fractures, 43 tibial stress fractures and 24 peri-implant fractures recorded in 12 of the 36 studies.
Peri-implant fracture following tibio-talo calcaneal arthrodesis using a hindfoot intramedullary nail is an uncommon but problematic condition to treat. General heterogeneity of patients and indications as well as a lack of descriptive detail in the current literature makes meta-analysis difficult. Given the lack of consensus on treatment, a classification system may be helpful to guide clinical practice.
距下关节跟骨融合术(TTC)越来越多地用于治疗后足关节炎和其他适应证。先前已经报道过跟骨融合钉周围的植入物周围骨折,由于多种手术考虑因素,包括骨折时后足融合的状态,这种骨折的治疗可能会很复杂。我们对跟骨融合钉周围植入物周围骨折的文献进行了系统回顾,并提出了一种分类系统,以帮助根据当前文献以及资深作者的集体经验来指导治疗。
根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行文献回顾,以确定在使用跟骨钉进行 TTC 融合术时观察到植入物周围骨折或其他硬件失败作为并发症的临床研究。使用特定的搜索词探索 PubMed/Medline/Cochrane 图书馆的电子数据库。纳入标准是任何至少在一名患者中报告使用跟骨钉进行 TTC 融合术后结果的临床研究。排除了尸体和非临床研究。
共确定了 36 项符合纳入标准的研究,这些研究报告了使用跟骨融合钉进行 TTC 融合术后的临床结果。在这 36 项研究中,有 13 项研究记录了术中骨折,43 项胫骨应力骨折和 12 项研究中的 24 项植入物周围骨折。
使用跟骨髓内钉进行距下关节跟骨融合术后,植入物周围骨折是一种不常见但治疗困难的问题。由于患者和适应证的一般异质性以及当前文献中缺乏描述性细节,使得荟萃分析变得困难。鉴于缺乏治疗共识,分类系统可能有助于指导临床实践。