• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨药剂师主导的药物管理中心员工的绩效预测因素。

Exploring performance predictors among employees in a pharmacist-led medication management center.

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Nov-Dec;60(6):809-817. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 May 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2020.04.009
PMID:32389553
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Health care companies are increasingly interested in developing and maintaining employee motivation. However, this can be challenging with different professions working together in delivering telephonic medication therapy management services. The purpose of the study is to assess employees' perceptions of performance metrics, strategies to achieve those metrics, motivational work factors, and barriers to achievement at a medication management center (MMC).

DESIGN

Focus group using purposive sampling.

SETTING

Six in-person focus groups were conducted with the MMC employees.

PARTICIPANTS

Separate focus groups were conducted for pharmacists, student pharmacist interns, and pharmacy technicians. Each group consisted of approximately 5 participants, lasted roughly 1 hour, and was facilitated by trained qualitative researchers.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The semistructured sessions involved participants responding to open-ended, predetermined questions introduced by a facilitator. The sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis. Two independent reviewers analyzed the transcripts; a third independent reviewer facilitated a consensus to resolve discrepancies.

RESULTS

Thirty MMC employees, with an average age of 32.1 ± 10.5 years, participated; most of them (73.3%) were women and had worked at the MMC for an average of 2.8 ± 2.2 years. Six themes were identified: (1) awareness and understanding of performance measures; (2) perceptions of performance measures; (3) suggested changes to make the performance measures more reflective of their roles; (4) motivating factors to improve performance; (5) performance barriers; and (6) strategies to achieve performance goals. The intrinsic motivational factors included providing patient care, helping change patients' lives, and meeting work goals. The extrinsic motivational factors included remuneration, management, teamwork, work environment, and feedback. The performance barriers were unrealistic goals, lack of feedback, ineffective communication, and inconsistent operational procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

These study findings contribute to a growing body of research surrounding employee motivation within organizations with diverse workforces. Future work is warranted to investigate employee motivation in similar pharmacy-related settings.

摘要

目的

医疗保健公司越来越有兴趣培养和维持员工的积极性。然而,在提供电话药物治疗管理服务时,不同专业的人员共同合作可能会带来挑战。本研究旨在评估药物管理中心(MMC)员工对绩效指标、实现这些指标的策略、激励工作因素以及实现目标的障碍的看法。

设计

使用目的抽样的焦点小组。

设置

在 MMC 员工中进行了 6 次现场焦点小组。

参与者

为药剂师、实习药剂师和药剂技术员分别进行了焦点小组。每组大约有 5 名参与者,持续大约 1 小时,由经过培训的定性研究人员主持。

结果

共有 30 名 MMC 员工参加了研究,平均年龄为 32.1 ± 10.5 岁,其中大多数(73.3%)为女性,在 MMC 的平均工作时间为 2.8 ± 2.2 年。确定了 6 个主题:(1)对绩效指标的认识和理解;(2)对绩效指标的看法;(3)建议对绩效指标进行更改,使其更能反映他们的角色;(4)提高绩效的激励因素;(5)绩效障碍;(6)实现绩效目标的策略。内在激励因素包括提供患者护理、帮助改变患者的生活和实现工作目标。外在激励因素包括薪酬、管理、团队合作、工作环境和反馈。绩效障碍包括不切实际的目标、缺乏反馈、沟通不畅和操作程序不一致。

结论

这些研究结果为在具有多元化员工队伍的组织中围绕员工激励开展的越来越多的研究做出了贡献。未来有必要在类似的药学相关环境中研究员工激励。

相似文献

1
Exploring performance predictors among employees in a pharmacist-led medication management center.探讨药剂师主导的药物管理中心员工的绩效预测因素。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Nov-Dec;60(6):809-817. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 May 7.
2
A motivational factors assessment instrument for medication management center employees providing medication therapy management services: A Rasch analysis.用于提供药物治疗管理服务的药物管理中心员工激励因素评估工具:Rasch 分析。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Jan-Feb;61(1):34-43.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.08.040. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
3
Pilot study of focus groups exploring student pharmacists' perceptions of a medication management center internship.药事管理中心实习对学生药剂师认知的焦点小组探索性研究。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Sep;12(9):1123-1128. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
Hospital pharmacists' perceptions of medication counseling: A focus group study.医院药剂师对用药咨询的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016 Sep-Oct;12(5):756-71. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
5
The impact of face-to-face educational outreach on diarrhoea treatment in pharmacies.面对面教育推广对药店腹泻治疗的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 1996 Sep;11(3):308-18. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.3.308.
6
Prescriber and employee utilization of a health sciences center campus outpatient pharmacy: A qualitative analysis.医疗机构校园门诊药房的开方者和员工使用情况:一项定性分析。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Nov 7;79(22):2032-2039. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac232.
7
Implementation of technician-driven medication therapy management program in community pharmacies.在社区药店实施技师驱动的药物治疗管理计划。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Jul-Aug;59(4S):S156-S160.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.06.014.
8
Generating demand for pharmacist-provided medication therapy management: identifying patient-preferred marketing strategies.生成药剂师提供的药物治疗管理需求:确定患者偏好的营销策略。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Sep-Oct;49(5):611-6. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08089.
9
Implementation of comprehensive medication management at supermarket pharmacies in a pharmacy network.在连锁药店中实施全面药物管理。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Jul-Aug;59(4S):S25-S31. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 May 9.
10
Pharmacy work: Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic rewards across role and setting.药学工作:角色和环境中的内在动机和外在奖励。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2024 Jan-Feb;64(1):104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.11.008. Epub 2023 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Australian community pharmacy service provision factors, stresses and strains: A qualitative study.澳大利亚社区药房服务提供的因素、压力与紧张状况:一项定性研究。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Mar 21;9:100247. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100247. eCollection 2023 Mar.