Suppr超能文献

使用事件相关电位进行物体记忆检索中的多模态特征绑定:对语义记忆模型的启示。

Multimodal feature binding in object memory retrieval using event-related potentials: Implications for models of semantic memory.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neuratherapeutics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.

Center for BrainHealth, The University of Texas at Dallas, 2200 West Mockingbird Lane, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.

出版信息

Int J Psychophysiol. 2020 Jul;153:116-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 May 7.

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that semantic processes are represented in multiple subsystems, we recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) as we elicited object memories using the modified Semantic Object Retrieval Test, during which an object feature, presented as a visual word [VW], an auditory word [AW], or a picture [Pic], was followed by a second feature always presented as a visual word. We performed both hypothesis-driven and data-driven analyses using event-related potentials (ERPs) time locked to the second stimulus. We replicated a previously reported left fronto-temporal ERP effect (750-1000 ms post-stimulus) in the VW task, and also found that this ERP component was only present during object memory retrieval in verbal (VW, AW) as opposed to non-verbal (Pic) stimulus types. We also found a right temporal ERP effect (850-1000 ms post-stimulus) that was present in auditory (AW) but not in visual (VW, Pic) stimulus types. In addition, we found an earlier left temporo-parietal ERP effect between 350 and 700 ms post-stimulus and a later midline parietal ERP effect between 700 and 1100 ms post-stimulus, present in all stimulus types, suggesting common neural mechanisms for object retrieval processes and object activation, respectively. These findings support multiple semantic subsystems that respond to varying stimulus modalities, and argue against an ultimate unitary amodal semantic analysis.

摘要

为了验证语义过程在多个子系统中表现的假设,我们在使用修改后的语义物体检索测试诱发物体记忆时记录了脑电图(EEG),在这个测试中,一个物体特征以视觉词[VW]、听觉词[AW]或图片[Pic]的形式呈现,随后是第二个特征,这个特征总是以视觉词的形式呈现。我们使用事件相关电位(ERPs)进行了假设驱动和数据驱动的分析,这些 ERPs 与第二个刺激的时间锁定。我们复制了之前在 VW 任务中报告的左额颞 ERP 效应(刺激后 750-1000 毫秒),并且还发现,这个 ERP 成分仅在言语(VW、AW)刺激类型的物体记忆检索中存在,而不在非言语(Pic)刺激类型中存在。我们还发现了一个右颞部 ERP 效应(刺激后 850-1000 毫秒),仅在听觉(AW)刺激类型中存在,而不在视觉(VW、Pic)刺激类型中存在。此外,我们发现了一个更早的左颞顶叶 ERP 效应,在刺激后 350 到 700 毫秒之间,以及一个更晚的中线顶叶 ERP 效应,在刺激后 700 到 1100 毫秒之间,在所有刺激类型中都存在,这分别表明了物体检索过程和物体激活的共同神经机制。这些发现支持了响应不同刺激模式的多个语义子系统,并反对最终的单一非模态语义分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验