Dimitriadis Yorgos
Université de Paris, France.
Hist Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;31(3):274-293. doi: 10.1177/0957154X20922131. Epub 2020 May 11.
This paper is the second of two to explore historical concepts of causation in psychiatry. Psychogenesis (as opposed to organogenesis) is superficially attractive but ambiguous, as it can apply either to something that is produced by the psyche or alternatively to the effect on the psyche from external factors. The term endogenous may be contrasted to exogenous or reactive, but the meanings of each have become blurred and ambiguous. Difficulty also arises when contrasting the process versus comprehensibility of mental disorders, as the limits of what may be understood are imprecise. A fourth comparison is between temperament and constitution against types of reaction, and again there is a tendency to circularity. Finally, a way forward is suggested using the notion of psychosomatic brain diseases.
本文是探讨精神病学中因果关系历史概念的两篇系列论文中的第二篇。心理发生(与器官发生相对)表面上很有吸引力,但含义模糊,因为它既可以指由心理产生的事物,也可以指外部因素对心理的影响。内源性这个术语可以与外源性或反应性相对比,但每个术语的含义都已变得模糊不清。在对比精神障碍的过程与可理解性时也会出现困难,因为可理解的界限并不精确。第四个对比是气质和体质与反应类型之间的对比,同样存在循环论证的倾向。最后,提出了一条前进的道路,即使用心身性脑部疾病的概念。