Badhey Arvind K, Khan Mohemmed N
Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Semin Plast Surg. 2020 May;34(2):86-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709431. Epub 2020 May 6.
Palatomaxillary reconstruction presents a unique challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. The maxillofacial skeleton preserves critical aerodigestive functions-it provides a stable hard palate to support mastication and separate the nasal and oral cavities, and buttress support to provide adequate midface contour. Free tissue transfer has become a routine part of the reconstructive ladder in managing palatomaxillary defects. While there is a wide variety of options for bony reconstruction within the head and neck, the fibula and the scapula, and their variations, have become two of the most commonly used options for midface reconstruction. This review will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both in specific regard to reconstruction of the palatomaxillary area.
腭上颌重建对重建外科医生来说是一项独特的挑战。颌面骨骼保留着关键的气道和消化道功能——它提供一个稳定的硬腭以支持咀嚼并分隔鼻腔和口腔,还提供支撑以塑造足够的中面部轮廓。在处理腭上颌缺损时,游离组织移植已成为重建阶梯中的常规部分。虽然头颈部骨重建有多种选择,但腓骨和肩胛骨及其变体已成为中面部重建最常用的两种选择。本综述将具体讨论两者在腭上颌区域重建方面的优缺点。