Sen Tabitha, Spruyt Karen
School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028-CNRS UMR 5292, University Claude Bernard, School of Medicine, Lyon, France.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 23;11:317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00317. eCollection 2020.
Since a thorough review in 2011 by Spruyt, into the integral pitfalls of pediatric questionnaires in sleep, sleep researchers worldwide have further evaluated many existing tools. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate and summarize the tools currently in circulation and provide recommendations for potential evolving avenues of pediatric sleep interest. 144 "tool"-studies (70 tools) have been published aiming at investigating sleep in primarily 6-18 years old per parental report. Although 27 new tools were discovered, most of the studies translated or evaluated the psychometric properties of existing tools. Some form of normative values has been established in 18 studies. More than half of the tools queried general sleep problems. Extra efforts in tool development are still needed for tools that assess children outside the 6-to-12-year-old age range, as well as for tools examining sleep-related aspects beyond sleep problems/disorders. Especially assessing the validity of tools has been pursued vis-à-vis fulfillment of psychometric criteria. While the Spruyt et al. review provided a rigorous step-by-step guide into the development and validation of such tools, a pattern of steps continue to be overlooked. As these instruments are potentially valuable in assisting in the development of a clinical diagnosis into pediatric sleep pathologies, it is required that while they are primary subjective measures, they behave as objective measures. More tools for specific populations (e.g., in terms of ages, developmental disabilities, and sleep pathologies) are still needed.
自2011年斯普鲁伊特对儿科睡眠问卷的整体缺陷进行全面审查以来,全球睡眠研究人员进一步评估了许多现有工具。本系统综述旨在全面评估和总结目前正在使用的工具,并为儿科睡眠研究潜在的发展方向提供建议。已发表了144项“工具”研究(涉及70种工具),旨在根据家长报告主要调查6至18岁儿童的睡眠情况。虽然发现了27种新工具,但大多数研究是对现有工具的心理测量特性进行翻译或评估。18项研究中已建立了某种形式的常模值。超过一半的工具询问了一般睡眠问题。对于评估6至12岁年龄范围以外儿童的工具,以及用于检查睡眠问题/障碍以外的睡眠相关方面的工具,仍需要在工具开发方面做出更多努力。特别是在根据心理测量标准来评估工具的有效性方面。虽然斯普鲁伊特等人的综述为这类工具的开发和验证提供了严格的分步指南,但仍有一些步骤模式被忽视。由于这些工具在协助儿科睡眠病理学临床诊断的发展方面可能具有价值,因此要求尽管它们主要是主观测量工具,但要表现得像客观测量工具。仍然需要更多针对特定人群(例如,在年龄、发育障碍和睡眠病理学方面)的工具。