Suppr超能文献

入侵物种在中国的快速遗传分化

Rapid Genetic Divergence of an Invasive Species, , in China.

作者信息

Xia Lu, Geng Qifang, An Shuqing

机构信息

School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Nanjing University Ecology Research Institute of Changshu (NJUecoRICH), Changshu, China.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2020 Apr 24;11:284. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00284. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Hundreds of plants and half a kilogram of seeds of , which were collected from Morehead City in North Carolina, Sapelo Island in Georgia, and Tampa Bay in Florida, were introduced to China in 1979. However, according to documented records, from different origins were introduced to different areas when the species was first introduced to the coastal areas of China in the 1980s. In order to understand the relationship between the invasive populations of China and the native populations of the United States, and whether the genetic structure and genetic diversity of the invasive populations of China were affected by different introductions in the 1980s, molecular markers were used to determine the levels of gene flow and its effect on population differentiation. A total of 715 samples of were collected from nine invasive populations in China and nine native populations from the United States. The genetic diversity and genetic structure of invasive and native populations were compared using microsatellite markers. The heterozygosity of Chinese invasive populations of ( = 0.538, = 0.725) were similar with those of native populations ( = 0.530, = 0.744), which may attribute to its multiple introductions with the multisource populations from different geographic areas of the United States. However, the lower allelic diversities of Chinese invasive populations were detected, which may be due to the founder effect, or the bottleneck, which supports the theory that the allelic diversity is more sensitive to population bottlenecks than heterozygosity. The results of the STRUCTURE analysis among all sampling sites showed that the value of ΔK was largest when = 2, which indicated that the invasive populations in China had completed differentiated from the native populations of the United States. This may be because of admixture and hybridization of three non-overlapping original populations, or the postintroduction rapid evolution in China, and reproductive isolation under long-term geographic isolation. There was significant differentiation among invasive populations, which was mainly affected by different human-mediated introductions in 1980s. Significant genetic structure ( = 7) and high genetic differentiation ( = 0.30193) were detected in Chinese invasive populations, which may due to the low natural gene flow among populations. The genetic structure of the invasive populations in China was still affected by the human-mediated introductions in the 1980s, and the different initial introductions might promote differentiation among the invasive populations. In fact, the human-mediated long-distance dispersal should take the most of responsibility for the rapid spread of along the coast of China. Multisource introductions of are perhaps helpful for local adaptation but itself cannot cause rapid spread along the whole coast of China. Meanwhile, we suggest that the prevention of gene exchange among populations of is the first and most important step in the control of the species on the coast of China, because admixture and hybridization of isolated populations might generate new heterosis and increase the difficulty of managing in China.

摘要

1979年,从北卡罗来纳州的莫尔黑德城、佐治亚州的萨佩洛岛和佛罗里达州的坦帕湾采集的数百株植物及半公斤种子被引入中国。然而,根据文献记载,20世纪80年代该物种首次引入中国沿海地区时,不同来源的[物种名称]被引入到了不同地区。为了了解中国入侵[物种名称]种群与美国本土[物种名称]种群之间的关系,以及中国入侵种群的遗传结构和遗传多样性是否受到20世纪80年代不同引入方式的影响,研究人员使用分子标记来确定基因流水平及其对种群分化的影响。共从中国的9个入侵种群和美国的9个本土种群采集了715份[物种名称]样本。利用微卫星标记比较了入侵种群和本土种群的遗传多样性和遗传结构。中国入侵[物种名称]种群的杂合度((H_{o}=0.538),(H_{e}=0.725))与本土种群((H_{o}=0.530),(H_{e}=0.744))相似,这可能归因于其从美国不同地理区域的多源种群进行的多次引入。然而,检测到中国入侵种群的等位基因多样性较低,这可能是由于奠基者效应或瓶颈效应,这支持了等位基因多样性比杂合度对种群瓶颈更敏感的理论。所有采样点的STRUCTURE分析结果表明,当(K = 2)时,(\Delta K)值最大,这表明中国的入侵[物种名称]种群已与美国的本土种群完成分化。这可能是由于三个不重叠的原始种群的混合和杂交,或者是引入后在中国的快速进化,以及长期地理隔离下的生殖隔离。入侵种群之间存在显著分化,这主要受20世纪80年代不同的人为介导引入的影响。在中国入侵种群中检测到显著的遗传结构((K = 7))和高遗传分化((F_{ST}=0.30193)),这可能是由于种群间自然基因流较低。中国入侵种群的遗传结构仍然受到20世纪80年代人为介导引入的影响,不同的初始引入可能促进了入侵种群之间的分化。事实上,人为介导的长距离扩散应该对[物种名称]在中国沿海的快速传播承担主要责任。[物种名称]的多源引入可能有助于局部适应,但本身并不能导致其在中国整个沿海的快速传播。同时,我们建议防止[物种名称]种群间的基因交换是控制中国沿海该物种的首要也是最重要的一步,因为隔离种群的混合和杂交可能产生新的杂种优势,增加在中国管理[物种名称]的难度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e0c/7193035/e447f19a6444/fgene-11-00284-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验