Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-De-L'Île-De-Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;8:106. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00106. eCollection 2020.
Public health (PH) interventions are crucial for ensuring sustainable healthcare services. Nevertheless, they represent a neglected area in the field of health technology assessment (HTA) due to various methodological issues and their complex design that goes beyond clinical setting. The present study provides an environmental scan of HTA initiatives related to the assessment of PH technologies on a global level. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 85 HTA-related European and international societies, health bodies, and networks from September 2018 to January 2019. The questionnaire contained four sections and 18 questions regarding activities related to the evaluation of PH technologies, information on existing PH technologies, and methodologies of assessment as well as barriers and facilitators to reaching a decision and implementing a PH technology. Among 52 survey responses, the majority of the respondents came from European countries (35%), followed by North American (27%), and South American (19%) countries. The main type of organizations covered by our survey included HTA agencies, public administrations, and research institutes. Seventy-one % of the institutions reported engagement in any aspect of HTA in the area of PH ( = 37). Among those, 81% evaluated less than 5 PH technologies from 2013 to 2018. The most common barriers for reaching a decision on PH technologies were lack of data, conflicting stakeholder priorities, and methodological issues. A total of 76 PH interventions were reported, and most cited initiatives were related to chronic disease screening, prevention of infectious diseases, and maternal, prenatal, and neonatal screening. Our survey reported a rather limited involvement of HTA in the evaluation of PH technologies. In particular, an evaluation of behavioral and lifestyle interventions remains extremely rare. The implementation of collaborative HTA approaches in the setting of PH practice and policy needs to be prioritized and further strengthened. Moreover, ensuring reliable data structures and consolidation of HTA methods for the evaluation of PH technologies will be crucial for tackling the enormous burden of non-communicable diseases in societies.
公共卫生(PH)干预对于确保可持续的医疗保健服务至关重要。然而,由于各种方法学问题以及超出临床环境的复杂设计,它们在卫生技术评估(HTA)领域代表了一个被忽视的领域。本研究对全球范围内与 PH 技术评估相关的 HTA 倡议进行了环境扫描。我们于 2018 年 9 月至 2019 年 1 月期间对 85 个与 HTA 相关的欧洲和国际协会、卫生机构和网络进行了横断面调查。问卷包含四个部分和 18 个问题,涉及 PH 技术评估相关活动、现有 PH 技术信息以及评估方法以及做出决策和实施 PH 技术的障碍和促进因素。在 52 份调查回复中,大多数受访者来自欧洲国家(35%),其次是北美(27%)和南美(19%)国家。我们调查涵盖的主要组织类型包括 HTA 机构、公共行政部门和研究机构。71%的机构报告在 PH 领域的任何 HTA 方面都有参与(=37)。其中,81%的机构评估了 2013 年至 2018 年期间少于 5 种 PH 技术。做出 PH 技术决策的最常见障碍是缺乏数据、利益相关者优先级冲突和方法学问题。共报告了 76 项 PH 干预措施,引用最多的举措与慢性病筛查、传染病预防以及母婴、产前和新生儿筛查有关。我们的调查报告显示,HTA 对 PH 技术评估的参与相当有限。特别是,对行为和生活方式干预的评估仍然极为罕见。需要优先考虑并进一步加强在 PH 实践和政策背景下采用协作 HTA 方法,并确保用于 PH 技术评估的可靠数据结构和 HTA 方法的整合,这对于应对社会中非传染性疾病的巨大负担至关重要。